Multimodal surface-based morphometry reveals diffuse cortical atrophy in traumatic brain injury

And U Turken, Timothy J Herron, Xiaojian Kang, Larry E O'Connor, Donna J Sorenson, Juliana V Baldo, David L Woods, And U Turken, Timothy J Herron, Xiaojian Kang, Larry E O'Connor, Donna J Sorenson, Juliana V Baldo, David L Woods

Abstract

Background: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often present with significant cognitive deficits without corresponding evidence of cortical damage on neuroradiological examinations. One explanation for this puzzling observation is that the diffuse cortical abnormalities that characterize TBI are difficult to detect with standard imaging procedures. Here we investigated a patient with severe TBI-related cognitive impairments whose scan was interpreted as normal by a board-certified radiologist in order to determine if quantitative neuroimaging could detect cortical abnormalities not evident with standard neuroimaging procedures.

Methods: Cortical abnormalities were quantified using multimodal surfaced-based morphometry (MSBM) that statistically combined information from high-resolution structural MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Normal values of cortical anatomy and cortical and pericortical DTI properties were quantified in a population of 43 healthy control subjects. Corresponding measures from the patient were obtained in two independent imaging sessions. These data were quantified using both the average values for each lobe and the measurements from each point on the cortical surface. The results were statistically analyzed as z-scores from the mean with a p < 0.05 criterion, corrected for multiple comparisons. False positive rates were verified by comparing the data from each control subject with the data from the remaining control population using identical statistical procedures.

Results: The TBI patient showed significant regional abnormalities in cortical thickness, gray matter diffusivity and pericortical white matter integrity that replicated across imaging sessions. Consistent with the patient's impaired performance on neuropsychological tests of executive function, cortical abnormalities were most pronounced in the frontal lobes.

Conclusions: MSBM is a promising tool for detecting subtle cortical abnormalities with high sensitivity and selectivity. MSBM may be particularly useful in evaluating cortical structure in TBI and other neurological conditions that produce diffuse abnormalities in both cortical structure and tissue properties.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative axial slices from clinical MRI scans of the TBI patient. T1-weighted (top row), FLAIR (middle row) and T2-weighted images. The scans were interpreted as normal at the initial neuroradiological examination. Images are displayed according to radiological convention (right side of the brain is shown on the left side of figure).
Figure 2
Figure 2
SBM image processing steps: Surface reconstruction and alignment to standard template. A. High-resolution T1-weighted images were processed using FreeSurfer 3.0 to map the cortical surface. The image is a lateral view of the TBI patient's left hemisphere. B. Computerized reconstruction of the gray/white matter boundary. A smoothed and expanded view of the white matter surface is shown. The image has been intensity normalized, skull-stripped and the cerebellum has been removed. C. Inflation of the cortical surface to map gyral and sulcal anatomy. Gyral regions are shown in green and sulcal regions in red. D. Coregistration of the subject's cortical surface to a common spherical template. This step allows the assessment of cortical tissue properties with respect to a normative database using a common coordinate system.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quantification of tissue properties in the cerebral cortex and in pericortical white matter. Two surfaces were defined from the T1-weighted anatomical images (left column): in mid-gray matter (red) and 2 mm below the gray-white matter boundary (blue). White matter fractional anisotropy (middle) was quantified 2-mm below the gray/white boundary and mean diffusivity (right) was quantified in both the cortical gray matter and the white matter surfaces. Parasagittal (left hemisphere) and axial (above the lateral ventricles) cross-sections from the TBI patient's first imaging session are shown. High intensity regions on the FA map correspond to major fiber bundles running parallel to the cortical surface. Cerebrospinal fluid surrounding the cortex appears bright on the MD map.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A, B. Cortical gray matter and pericortical tissue properties quantified along the cortical mantle in control subjects. Mean values (A) and variability (B, coefficient of variation) for cortical thickness, cortical mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of pericortical white matter (2 mm below the gray-white boundary) for control subjects are shown for each point on the surfaces of the two hemispheres. The corpus callosum is cut out, and the regions with very low values (e.g., thickness < 1 mm, coefficient of variation < 1%) appear in gray.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Co-registration of the TBI patient's cortical surface anatomy with the Freesurfer atlas. An accurate parcellation of the cortical surface was produced by Freesurfer shown superimposed on the semi-inflated surface of the patient (sulci = dark, gyri light). Cortical regions are accurately labeled. Anatomical labels: Calc, calcarine sulcus; Cent, central sulcus; CinG, cingulate gyrus; CinS, cingulate sulcus; Cun, cuneus; IPS, interparietal sulcus; Ling, lingual gyrus; MFG, medial frontal gyrus; MTG, medial temporal gyrus; Pre, precentral gyrus; Post, postcentral gyrus; Orb, orbital sulcus; OTS, occipito-temporal sulcus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; STS, superior temporal sulcus; TOS, transverse occipital sulcus.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Histograms showing the lobar measurements from the patient in relation to the distributions for the control group. The distribution of cortical thickness, cortical mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of pericortical white matter across 43 control subjects are shown for each lobe. The red dots indicate the corresponding measures from the patient's two imaging sessions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Regional cortical gray matter abnormalities detected by SBM in the TBI patient. Reduced cortical thickness (A) and increased cortical gray matter diffusivity (B) were most pronounced in the frontal lobes in two imaging sessions. Each row shows lateral and medial inflated views of the two hemispheres. Color bar shows z-values.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Pericortical white matter abnormalities. Regions of low anisotropy (A) and high diffusivity (B) were broadly distributed underneath the cortical mantle, with similar spatial distributions in both sessions (point-wise, z > 1.5, shown without the cluster threshold).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Combined assessment of cortical abnormalities. Joint tests of significant cortical gray matter and pericortical white matter abnormalities using Fisher's combined probability test revealed extensive abnormalities, concentrated mainly in the frontal lobes and basal occipito-temporal regions. The spatial distribution of the abnormalities replicated on the two different imaging sessions.

References

    1. Levine B, Fujiwara E, O'Connor C, Richard N, Kovacevic N, Mandic M, Restagno A, Easdon C, Robertson IH, Graham SJ. In vivo characterization of traumatic brain injury neuropathology with structural and functional neuroimaging. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23(10):1396–1411. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1396.
    1. Bigler ED. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;16(2):117–134. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200104000-00003.
    1. Azouvi P. Neuroimaging correlates of cognitive and functional outcome after traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol. 2000;13(6):665–669. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200012000-00009.
    1. Meythaler JM, Peduzzi JD, Eleftheriou E, Novack TA. Current concepts: diffuse axonal injury-associated traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(10):1461–1471. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25137.
    1. Belanger HG, Vanderploeg RD, Curtiss G, Warden DL. Recent neuroimaging techniques in mild traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;19(1):5–20.
    1. Smith DH, Meaney DF, Shull WH. Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18(4):307–316. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200307000-00003.
    1. Bigler ED. Neurobiology and neuropathology underlie the neuropsychological deficits associated with traumatic brain injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18(6):595–621.
    1. Merkley TL, Bigler ED, Wilde EA, McCauley SR, Hunter JV, Levin HS. Diffuse changes in cortical thickness in pediatric moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25(11):1343–1345. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0615.
    1. Gale SD, Baxter L, Roundy N, Johnson SC. Traumatic brain injury and grey matter concentration: a preliminary voxel based morphometry study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(7):984–988. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.036210.
    1. Salmond CH, Chatfield DA, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Sahakian BJ. Cognitive sequelae of head injury: involvement of basal forebrain and associated structures. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 1):189–200.
    1. Fujiwara E, Schwartz ML, Gao F, Black SE, Levine B. Ventral frontal cortex functions and quantified MRI in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(2):461–474. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.027.
    1. Kim J, Avants B, Patel S, Whyte J, Coslett BH, Pluta J, Detre JA, Gee JC. Structural consequences of diffuse traumatic brain injury: a large deformation tensor-based morphometry study. Neuroimage. 2008;39(3):1014–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.005.
    1. Adams H, Mitchell DE, Graham DI, Doyle D. Diffuse brain damage of immediate impact type. Its relationship to 'primary brain-stem damage' in head injury. Brain. 1977;100(3):489–502. doi: 10.1093/brain/100.3.489.
    1. Raghupathi R, Graham DI, McIntosh TK. Apoptosis after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17(10):927–938. doi: 10.1089/neu.2000.17.927.
    1. Immonen RJ, Kharatishvili I, Grohn H, Pitkanen A, Grohn OH. Quantitative MRI predicts long-term structural and functional outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage. 2009;45(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.022.
    1. Ross DT, Meaney DF, Sabol MK, Smith DH, Gennarelli TA. Distribution of forebrain diffuse axonal injury following inertial closed head injury in miniature swine. Exp Neurol. 1994;126(2):291–299. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1994.1067.
    1. Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD. Quantitative structural changes in white and gray matter 1 year following traumatic brain injury in rats. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;103(6):607–614. doi: 10.1007/s00401-001-0510-8.
    1. Van Essen DC. A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. Neuroimage. 2005;28(3):635–662. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058.
    1. Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(20):11050–11055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200033797.
    1. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Human Brain Mapping. 1999;8:272–284. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>;2-4.
    1. Van Essen DC, Drury HA. Structural and functional analyses of human cerebral cortex using a surface-based atlas. J Neurosci. 1997;17(18):7079–7102.
    1. Thompson PM, MacDonald D, Mega MS, Holmes CJ, Evans AC, Toga AW. Detection and mapping of abnormal brain structure with a probabilistic atlas of cortical surfaces. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21(4):567–581. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199707000-00008.
    1. Wisco JJ, Kuperberg G, Manoach D, Quinn BT, Busa E, Fischl B, Heckers S, Sorensen AG. Abnormal cortical folding patterns within Broca's area in schizophrenia: evidence from structural MRI. Schizophr Res. 2007;94(1-3):317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.031.
    1. Du AT, Schuff N, Kramer JH, Rosen HJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Rankin K, Miller BL, Weiner MW. Different regional patterns of cortical thinning in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 4):1159–1166.
    1. Shaw P, Lerch J, Greenstein D, Sharp W, Clasen L, Evans A, Giedd J, Castellanos FX, Rapoport J. Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and clinical outcome in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):540–549. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.540.
    1. Nordahl CW, Dierker D, Mostafavi I, Schumann CM, Rivera SM, Amaral DG, Van Essen DC. Cortical folding abnormalities in autism revealed by surface-based morphometry. J Neurosci. 2007;27(43):11725–11735. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0777-07.2007.
    1. Thompson PM, Mega MS, Woods RP, Zoumalan CI, Lindshield CJ, Blanton RE, Moussai J, Holmes CJ, Cummings JL, Toga AW. Cortical change in Alzheimer's disease detected with a disease-specific population-based brain atlas. Cereb Cortex. 2001;11(1):1–16. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.1.1.
    1. Desikan RS, Cabral HJ, Hess CP, Dillon WP, Glastonbury CM, Weiner MW, Schmansky NJ, Greve DN, Salat DH, Buckner RL. Automated MRI measures identify individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 8):2048–2057. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp123.
    1. Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(6):469–480. doi: 10.1038/nrn1119.
    1. Basser PJ. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed. 1995;8(7-8):333–344. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1940080707.
    1. Thakkar KN, Polli FE, Joseph RM, Tuch DS, Hadjikhani N, Barton JJ, Manoach DS. Response monitoring, repetitive behaviour and anterior cingulate abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) Brain. 2008;131(Pt 9):2464–2478. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn099.
    1. Manoach DS, Ketwaroo GA, Polli FE, Thakkar KN, Barton JJ, Goff DC, Fischl B, Vangel M, Tuch DS. Reduced microstructural integrity of the white matter underlying anterior cingulate cortex is associated with increased saccadic latency in schizophrenia. Neuroimage. 2007;37(2):599–610. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.062.
    1. Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Greve DN, Fischl B, Benner T, Kouwe AJ van der, Salat D, Bjornerud A, Due-Tonnessen P, Walhovd KB. The relationship between diffusion tensor imaging and volumetry as measures of white matter properties. Neuroimage. 2008;42(4):1654–1668. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.005.
    1. Kang XJ, Herron TJ, Turken AU, Woods DL. The Analysis of Peri-Cortical White Matter: A Comparison of FA and MTR. Neuroimage. 2009;47(Supplement 1):S39–S41.
    1. Mac Donald CL, Dikranian K, Bayly P, Holtzman D, Brody D. Diffusion tensor imaging reliably detects experimental traumatic axonal injury and indicates approximate time of injury. J Neurosci. 2007;27(44):11869–11876. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3647-07.2007.
    1. Eriksson SH, Rugg-Gunn FJ, Symms MR, Barker GJ, Duncan JS. Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with epilepsy and malformations of cortical development. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 3):617–626. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.3.617.
    1. Arfanakis K, Haughton VM, Carew JD, Rogers BP, Dempsey RJ, Meyerand ME. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(5):794–802.
    1. Huisman TA, Sorensen AG, Hergan K, Gonzalez RG, Schaefer PW. Diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of diffuse axonal injury in closed head injury. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27(1):5–11. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200301000-00002.
    1. Inglese M, Makani S, Johnson G, Cohen BA, Silver JA, Gonen O, Grossman RI. Diffuse axonal injury in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(2):298–303. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.2.0298.
    1. Meaney DF, Ross DT, Winkelstein BA, Brasko J, Goldstein D, Bilston LB, Thibault LE, Gennarelli TA. Modification of the cortical impact model to produce axonal injury in the rat cerebral cortex. J Neurotrauma. 1994;11(5):599–612. doi: 10.1089/neu.1994.11.599.
    1. Farkas O, Povlishock JT. Cellular and subcellular change evoked by diffuse traumatic brain injury: a complex web of change extending far beyond focal damage. Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:43–59. full_text.
    1. Lifshitz J, Kelley BJ, Povlishock JT. Perisomatic thalamic axotomy after diffuse traumatic brain injury is associated with atrophy rather than cell death. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66(3):218–229. doi: 10.1097/01.jnen.0000248558.75950.4d.
    1. Herron TJ, Turken AU, Kang XJ, Woods DL. Quantitative automated lesion detection (QALD) after traumatic brain injury. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 2007;33:262–268.
    1. Delis D, Kaplan E, Kramer J, Ober B. California Verbal Learning Test II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2000.
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Int Bioethique. 2004;15(1):124–129. doi: 10.3917/jib.151.0124.
    1. Mangin JF, Poupon C, Clark C, Le Bihan D, Bloch I. Distortion correction and robust tensor estimation for MR diffusion imaging. Med Image Anal. 2002;6(3):191–198. doi: 10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00079-8.
    1. Welk M, Weickert J, Becker F, Schnorr C, Feddern C, Burgeth B. Median and related local filters for tensor-valued images. Signal Processing Magazine. 2007;87:291–308.
    1. Koay CG, Chang LC, Carew JD, Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. A unifying theoretical and algorithmic framework for least squares methods of estimation in diffusion tensor imaging. J Magn Reson. 2006;182(1):115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.06.020.
    1. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999;9(2):179–194. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395.
    1. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis II: Inflation flattening and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 1999;9:195–207. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396.
    1. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, Kouwe A van der, Killiany R, Kennedy D, Klaveness S. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33(3):341–355. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00569-X.
    1. Lerch JP, Evans AC. Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation. Neuroimage. 2005;24(1):163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.045.
    1. Chung MK, Robbins SM, Dalton KM, Davidson RJ, Alexander AL, Evans AC. Cortical thickness analysis in autism with heat kernel smoothing. Neuroimage. 2005;25(4):1256–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.052.
    1. Xiong J, Gao J, Lancaster JL, Fox PT. Clustered pixels analysis for functional MRI activation studies of the human brain. Human Brain Mapping. 1995;3(4):287–301. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460030404.
    1. Kruggel F. MRI-based volumetry of head compartments: normative values of healthy adults. Neuroimage. 2006;30(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.063.
    1. Fisher RA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1925.
    1. Brown MB. A Method for Combining Non-Independent, One-Sided Tests of Significance. Biometrics. 1975;31(4):987–992. doi: 10.2307/2529826.
    1. Zafonte RD, Ricker J, Yonas H, Wagner A. Frontal contusions imaging and behavioral consequences. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3):197–198. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000154903.36900.47.
    1. Levine B, Kovacevic N, Nica EI, Cheung G, Gao F, Schwartz ML, Black SE. The Toronto traumatic brain injury study: injury severity and quantified MRI. Neurology. 2008;70(10):771–778. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304108.32283.aa.
    1. Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.
    1. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
    1. Stuss DT. Frontal lobes and attention: processes and networks, fractionation and integration. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12(2):261–271. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060358.
    1. Oishi K, Zilles K, Amunts K, Faria A, Jiang H, Li X, Akhter K, Hua K, Woods R, Toga AW. Human brain white matter atlas: identification and assignment of common anatomical structures in superficial white matter. Neuroimage. 2008;43(3):447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.009.
    1. Marenco S, Rawlings R, Rohde GK, Barnett AS, Honea RA, Pierpaoli C, Weinberger DR. Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging. Psychiatry Res. 2006;147(1):69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.008.
    1. Thakkar KN, Polli FE, Joseph RM, Tuch DS, Hadjikhani N, Barton JJ, Manoach DS. Response monitoring, repetitive behaviour and anterior cingulate abnormalities in ASD. Brain. 2008.
    1. Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. 2001;14(2):486–500. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0845.
    1. Crinion J, Ashburner J, Leff A, Brett M, Price C, Friston K. Spatial normalization of lesioned brains: performance evaluation and impact on fMRI analyses. Neuroimage. 2007;37(3):866–875. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.065.
    1. Nachev P, Coulthard E, Jager HR, Kennard C, Husain M. Enantiomorphic normalization of focally lesioned brains. Neuroimage. 2008;39(3):1215–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.002.
    1. Sidaros A, Skimminge A, Liptrot MG, Sidaros K, Engberg AW, Herning M, Paulson OB, Jernigan TL, Rostrup E. Long-term global and regional brain volume changes following severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study with clinical correlates. Neuroimage. 2009;44(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.030.
    1. Blatter DD, Bigler ED, Gale SD, Johnson SC, Anderson CV, Burnett BM, Ryser D, Macnamara SE, Bailey BJ. MR-based brain and cerebrospinal fluid measurement after traumatic brain injury: correlation with neuropsychological outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18(1):1–10.
    1. Trivedi MA, Ward MA, Hess TM, Gale SD, Dempsey RJ, Rowley HA, Johnson SC. Longitudinal changes in global brain volume between 79 and 409 days after traumatic brain injury: relationship with duration of coma. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(5):766–771. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0205.
    1. Kraus MF, Susmaras T, Caughlin BP, Walker CJ, Sweeney JA, Little DM. White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 10):2508–2519. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm216.
    1. Salmond CH, Menon DK, Chatfield DA, Williams GB, Pena A, Sahakian BJ, Pickard JD. Diffusion tensor imaging in chronic head injury survivors: correlations with learning and memory indices. Neuroimage. 2006;29(1):117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.012.
    1. Sidaros A, Engberg AW, Sidaros K, Liptrot MG, Herning M, Petersen P, Paulson OB, Jernigan TL, Rostrup E. Diffusion tensor imaging during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury and relation to clinical outcome: a longitudinal study. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 2):559–572. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm294.
    1. Benson RR, Meda SA, Vasudevan S, Kou Z, Govindarajan KA, Hanks RA, Millis SR, Makki M, Latif Z, Coplin W. Global white matter analysis of diffusion tensor images is predictive of injury severity in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(3):446–459. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0153.
    1. Chappell MH, Ulug AM, Zhang L, Heitger MH, Jordan BD, Zimmerman RD, Watts R. Distribution of microstructural damage in the brains of professional boxers: a diffusion MRI study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24(3):537–542. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20656.
    1. Admiraal-Behloul F, Heuvel DM van den, Olofsen H, van Osch MJ, Grond J van der, van Buchem MA, Reiber JH. Fully automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in MR images of the elderly. Neuroimage. 2005;28(3):607–617. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.061.
    1. Anbeek P, Vincken KL, van Osch MJ, Bisschops RH, Grond J van der. Automatic segmentation of different-sized white matter lesions by voxel probability estimation. Med Image Anal. 2004;8(3):205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2004.06.019.
    1. Chappell MH, Brown JA, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Ulug AM, Watts R. Multivariate analysis of diffusion tensor imaging data improves the detection of microstructural damage in young professional boxers. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;26(10):1398–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.04.004.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅