High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers

Terence C Burnham, Terence C Burnham

Abstract

The ultimatum game is a simple negotiation with the interesting property that people frequently reject offers of 'free' money. These rejections contradict the standard view of economic rationality. This divergence between economic theory and human behaviour is important and has no broadly accepted cause. This study examines the relationship between ultimatum game rejections and testosterone. In a variety of species, testosterone is associated with male seeking dominance. If low ultimatum game offers are interpreted as challenges, then high-testosterone men may be more likely to reject such offers. In this experiment, men who reject low offers ($5 out of $40) have significantly higher testosterone levels than those who accept. In addition, high testosterone levels are associated with higher ultimatum game offers, but this second finding is not statistically significant.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subjects who reject $5 out of $40 have significantly higher testosterone levels than those who accept.

References

    1. Alexander R.D. A. de Gruyter; Hawthorne, NY: 1987. The biology of moral systems.
    1. Alexander R.D. The challenge of human social behavior. Evol. Psychol. 2006;4:1–32.
    1. Blount S. When social outcomes aren't fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Processes. 1995;63:131–144.
    1. Bolton G.E. A comparative model of bargaining: theory and evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 1991;81:1096–1136.
    1. Bolton G.E. The rationality of splitting equally. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1997;32:365–381.
    1. Book A.S, Starzyk K.B, Quinsey V.L. The relationship between testosterone and aggression: a meta-analysis. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2001;6:579–599.
    1. Burnham T.C, Chapman J.F, Gray P, McIntyre M, Lipson S, Ellison P. Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone. Horm. Behav. 2003;44:119–122.
    1. Cameron L. Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: experimental evidence from Indonesia. Econ. Inq. 1999;37:47–59.
    1. Clutton-Brock T.H, Parker G.A. Punishment in animal societies. Nature. 1995;373:209–216.
    1. Dabbs J.M. Testosterone, smiling, and facial appearance. J. Nonverbal Behav. 1997;21:45–55.
    1. Dabbs J.M, Booth A. Testosterone and men's marriages. Soc. Forces. 1993;72:463–477.
    1. Dabbs J.M, Hargrove M. Age, testosterone, and behavior among female prison inmates. Psychomatic Med. 1997;59:477–480.
    1. Ellingsen T. The evolution of bargaining behavior. Q. J. Econ. 1997;112:518–602.
    1. Ellison P.T. Human salivary steroids: methodological considerations and applications in physical anthropology. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 1988;31:115–142.
    1. Ellison P.T. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA: 2001. On fertile ground.
    1. Fehr E, Schmidt K. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 1999;114:817–868.
    1. Gangestad S.W, Thornhill R. Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: a model and its implications. J. Evol. Biol. 1999;12:402–416.
    1. Grant V, France J. Dominance and testosterone in women. Biol. Psychol. 2001;58:41–47.
    1. Gray P.B, Chapman J.F, Burnham T.C, McIntyre M.H, Lipson S.F, Ellison P.T. Human male pair bonding and testosterone. Hum. Nat. 2004;15:119–132.
    1. Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1982;3:367–388.
    1. Hegner R.E, Wingfield J.C. Effects of experimental manipulation of testosterone levels on parental investment and breeding success in male house sparrows. Auk. 1987;104:462–469.
    1. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R. In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 2001;91:73–78.
    1. Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith V.L. On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. Int. J. Game Theory. 1996;25:289–301.
    1. Kemper T.D. Rutgers University Press; New Brunswick, NJ: 1990. Social structure and testosterone: explorations of the socio-bio-social chain.
    1. Kouri E.M, Lukas S.E, Pope H.G.J, Oliva P.S. Increased aggressive responding in male volunteers following the administration of gradually increasing doses of testosterone cypionate. Drug Alcohol Depen. 1995;40:73–79.
    1. Manning J.T, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones D.I. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum. Reprod. 1998;13:3000–3004.
    1. Manning J.T, Wood S, Vang E, Walton J, Bundred P.E, Heyningen C.V, Lewis-Jones D.I. Second to fourth digit ratio (2D : 4D) and testosterone in men. Asian J. Androl. 2004;6:211–215.
    1. Mazur A. A cross-species comparison of status in small established groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1973;38:513–530.
    1. Mazur A. Hormones, aggression and dominance in humans. In: Suare B, editor. Hormones and aggressive behavior. Plenum; New York, NY: 1983. pp. 563–576.
    1. Mazur A. A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Soc. Forces. 1985;64:377–402.
    1. Mazur A, Booth A. Testosterone and dominance in men. Behav. Brain Sci. 1998;21:353–397.
    1. McIntyre M.H, Gangestad S.W, Gray P.E, Chapman J.F, Burnham T.C, O'Rourke M.T, Thornhill R. Romantic involvement often reduces men's testosterone levels—but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2006;91:642–651.
    1. Muller M, Wrangham R. Dominance, aggression, and testosterone in wild chimpanzees: a test of the “Challenge Hypothesis”. Anim. Behav. 2004;67:113–123.
    1. Nowak M.A, Page K.M, Sigmund K. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum bargaining game. Science. 2000;289:1773–1775.
    1. Page K.M, Nowak M.A. A generalized adaptive dynamics framework can describe the evolutionary ultimatum game. J. Theor. Biol. 2000;209:173–179.
    1. Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and econometrics. Am. Econ. Rev. 1993;83:1281–1303.
    1. Robbins M, Czekala N. Preliminary investigation of urinary testosterone and cortisol levels in wild male mountain gorillas. Am. J. Primatol. 1997;43:51–64.
    1. Roth A.E. Bargaining experiments. In: Kagel J.H, Roth A.E, editors. Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1995. pp. 253–348.
    1. Roth A.E, Prasnikar V, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Zamir S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 1991;81:1068–1095.
    1. Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica. 1982;50:97–109.
    1. Sanfey A.G, Rilling J.K, Aronson J.A, Nystrom L.E, Cohen J.D. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science. 2003;300:1755–1758.
    1. Sapolsky R. Adrenocortical function, social rank, and personality among wild baboons. Biol. Psychiat. 1990;28:862–878.
    1. Silverin B. Effects of long-acting testosterone treatment on free-living pied flycathcers, Ficedula hyupoleuca, during the breeding period. Anim. Behav. 1980;28:906–912.
    1. Stahl I. Economic Research Institute; Stockholm, Sweden: 1972. Bargaining theory.
    1. Trivers R. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 1971;46:35–57.
    1. Van den Bergh B, Dewitte S. Digit ratio (2D : 4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2006;273:2091–2095.
    1. Wagner J.D, Flinn M.V, England B.G. Hormonal response to competition among male coalitions. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2002;23:437–442.
    1. Wingfield J.C. Androgens and mating systems: testosterone-induced polygyny in normally monogamous birds. Auk. 1984;101:665–671.
    1. Wingfield J.C, Hegner R.E, Dufty A.M, Ball G.F. The ‘Challenge Hypothesis’ theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. Am. Nat. 1990;136:829–846.
    1. Zaatari D, Trivers R. Fluctuating asymmetry and behavior in the ultimatum game in Jamaica? Evol. Hum. Behav. 2007;28:223–227.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅