"Unrigging the support wheels" - A qualitative study on patients' experiences with and perspectives on low-intensity CBT

Elisa Haller, Nicole Besson, Birgit Watzke, Elisa Haller, Nicole Besson, Birgit Watzke

Abstract

Background: Low-intensity treatments imply reduced therapist contact due to an emphasis on self-help and the use of technologies to deliver treatment. The role of the remoteness, the reduced therapist contact, and the interplay of these components has not been differentiated from a patients' perspective so far. This study's purpose is to capture patients' experiences with telephone-based self-help cognitive behavioural therapy (tel-CBT).

Methods: A subsample of mildly to moderately depressed patients (N = 13) who finished tel-CBT as part of a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT) in routine care were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by two coders blind to treatment outcome. Using qualitative content analysis with deductive and inductive procedures, a two-level category system was established.

Results: The category system contains four category clusters regarding expectations, self-help related aspects, telephone-related aspects, and implications for patients' treatment pathway, and subsumes a total of 15 categories. Self-help related aspects circulate around the interplay between written materials and professional input, trust and support in the therapeutic relationship and its relation to the initial personal contact, as well as CBT principles. Telephone-related aspects entail perceived advantages and disadvantages of the telephone on an organisational and content level as well as a discourse around distance and closeness in the interaction. Although patients raised doubts regarding the long-term effect of the intervention on symptomatology, patients expressed satisfaction with the treatment and reported an immediate as well as a longer lasting personal impact of the treatment. These results indicate user acceptance with tel-CBT.

Conclusions: This qualitative analysis captures patients' experiences with tel-CBT and the perceived helpfulness of the diverse treatment components. This can facilitate refining aspects of low-intensity treatments and might improve dissemination.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02667366. Registered on 3 December 2015.

Keywords: Acceptance; Client experiences; Mental health services research; Telephone-CBT.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Ali S, Rhodes L, Moreea O, McMillan D, Gilbody S, Leach C, et al. How durable is the effect of low intensity CBT for depression and anxiety? Remission and relapse in a longitudinal cohort study. Behav Res Ther. 2017;94:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.04.006.
    1. Andersson G, Titov N. Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):4–11. doi: 10.1002/wps.20083.
    1. Beattie A, Shaw A, Kaur S, Kessler D. Primary-care patients’ expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2009;12(1):45–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00531.x.
    1. Bee PE, Bower P, Lovell K, Gilbody S, Richards D, Gask L, et al. Psychotherapy mediated by remote communication technologies: A meta-analytic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8(1). 10.1186/1471-244X-8-60.
    1. Bee PE, Lovell K, Lidbetter N, Easton K, Gask L. You can’t get anything perfect: “User perspectives on the delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy by telephone”. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(7):1308–1315. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.031.
    1. Bendelin N, Hesser H, Dahl J, Carlbring P, Nelson KZ, Andersson G. Experiences of guided Internet-based cognitive-behavioural treatment for depression: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11(1). 10.1186/1471-244X-11-107.
    1. Bennett-Levy James, Richards David A., Farrand Paul. Low intensity CBT interventions: a revolution in mental health care. In: Bennett-Levy James, Farrand Paul., editors. Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions. 2010. pp. 3–18.
    1. Bordin, ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. 1979;16(3):252-260.
    1. Bower P, Richards D, Lovell K. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of self- help treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care: A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2001:8.
    1. Brown RA, Lewinsohn PM. A Psychoeducational Approach to the Treatment of Depression: Comparison of Group, Individual, and Minimal Contact Procedures. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984;52(5):774–783. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.52.5.774.
    1. Bryant MJ, Simons AD, Thase ME. Therapist Skill and Patient Variables in Homework Compliance: Controlling an Uncontrolled Variable in Cognitive Therapy Outcome Research. Cogn Ther Res. 1999;23(4):19. doi: 10.1023/A:1018703901116.
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1194.
    1. Clarke H, Rees A, Hardy GE. The big idea: Clients’ perspectives of change processes in cognitive therapy. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2004;77(1):67–89. doi: 10.1348/147608304322874263.
    1. Conklin LR, Strunk DR, Cooper AA. Therapist Behaviors as Predictors of Immediate Homework Engagement in Cognitive Therapy for Depression. Cogn Ther Res. 2018;42(1):16–23. doi: 10.1007/s10608-017-9873-6.
    1. Cuijpers P, Donker T, van Straten A, Li J, Andersson G. Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychol Med. 2010;40(12):1943–1957. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000772.
    1. Dimidjian S, Hollon SD, Dobson KS, Schmaling KB, Kohlenberg RJ, Addis ME, et al. Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(4):658–670. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.658.
    1. Gega L, Smith J, Reynolds S. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression by computer vs. therapist: Patient experiences and therapeutic processes. Psychother Res. 2013;23(2):218–231. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.766941.
    1. Gellatly J, Bower P, Hennessy S, Richards D, Gilbody S, Lovell K. What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychol Med. 2007;37(09):1217. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000062.
    1. Haas Leonard J., Benedict J. G., Kobos Joseph C. Psychotherapy by telephone: Risks and benefits for psychologists and consumers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1996;27(2):154–160. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.27.2.154.
    1. Horvath Adam O., Symonds B. Dianne. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1991;38(2):139–149. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139.
    1. Kazantzis N, Whittington C, Zelencich L, Kyrios M, Norton PJ, Hofmann SG. Quantity and Quality of Homework Compliance: A Meta-Analysis of Relations With Outcome in Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Behav Ther. 2016;47(5):755–772. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.05.002.
    1. Knaevelsrud C, Maercker A. Internet-based treatment for PTSD reduces distress and facilitates the development of a strong therapeutic alliance: A randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2007;7(13). 10.1186/1471-244X-7-13.
    1. Lynch D, Tamburrino M, Nagel R, Smith MK. Telephone-Based Treatment for Family Practice Patients with Mild Depression. Psychol Rep. 2004;94(3):785–792. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.3.785-792.
    1. Macdonald W, Mead N, Bower P, Richards D, Lovell K. A Qualitative Study of Patients’ Perceptions of a ‘Minimal’ Psychological Therapy. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007;53(1):23–35. doi: 10.1177/0020764006066841.
    1. May, C, Gask, l, Atkinson, T, Ellis, N, Mair, F, Esmail, A. Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1889e1901.
    1. Mayring Philipp. Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse; pp. 601–613.
    1. Mohr DC, Hart SL, Julian L, Catledge C, Honos-Webb L, Vella L, Tasch ET. Telephone-Administered Psychotherapy for Depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(9):1007. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.1007.
    1. Mohr DC, Ho J, Duffecy J, Baron KG, Lehman KA, Jin L, et al. Perceived barriers to psychological treatments and their relationship to depression. J Clin Psychol. 2010;66(4):394–409. 10.1002/jclp.20659.
    1. Mohr DC, Vella L, Hart S, Heckman T, Simon G. The Effect of Telephone-Administered Psychotherapy on Symptoms of Depression and Attrition: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2008;15(3):243–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00134.x.
    1. Norcross John C., Lambert Michael J. Psychotherapy relationships that work II. Psychotherapy. 2011;48(1):4–8. doi: 10.1037/a0022180.
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
    1. Richards DA, Lankshear AJ, Fletcher J, Rogers A, Barkham M, Bower P, et al. Developing a U.K. protocol for collaborative care: A qualitative study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(4):296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.03.005.
    1. Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Tutty S, Operskalski B, Von Korff M. Telephone Psychotherapy and Telephone Care Management for Primary Care Patients Starting Antidepressant Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2004;292(8):935–942. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.935.
    1. Steinmann M, Heddaeus D, Liebherz S, Weymann N, Härter M, Watzke B. Telefongestützte Verhaltenstherapie als niedrigschwellige Intervention bei Depression: Ein Behandlungsprogramm für den deutschen Sprachraum. Verhaltenstherapie. 2016;26(4):244–253. doi: 10.1159/000452435.
    1. Stiles-Shields C, Kwasny MJ, Cai X, Mohr DC. Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(2):349–354. doi: 10.1037/a0035554.
    1. Straarup NS, Poulsen S. Helpful aspects of metacognitive therapy and cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: A qualitative study. Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;8. 10.1017/S1754470X15000574.
    1. Tindall L, Mikocka-Walus A, McMillan D, Wright B, Hewitt C, Gascoyne S. Is behavioural activation effective in the treatment of depression in young people? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2017;90(4):770–796. doi: 10.1111/papt.12121.
    1. Tutty Steve, Ludman Evette Joy, Simon Greg. Feasibility and acceptability of a telephone psychotherapy program for depressed adults treated in primary care. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2005;27(6):400–410. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.06.009.
    1. Tutty S, Spangler DL, Poppleton LE, Ludman EJ, Simon GE. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Teletherapy in Depressed Adults. Behav Ther. 2010;41(2):229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.03.002.
    1. Wabnitz P, Löhr M, Nienaber A, Hemkendreis B, Kronmüller K, Schulz M. Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (LI-CBT) – Eine Einführung in Konzepte und Rahmenbedingungen. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. 2017;67(08):362–368. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-105481.
    1. Watzke B, Haller E, Steinmann M, Heddaeus D, Härter M, König H-H, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based cognitive-behavioural therapy in primary care: Study protocol of TIDe – telephone intervention for depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1). 10.1186/s12888-017-1429-5.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅