The AViKA (Adding Value in Knee Arthroplasty) postoperative care navigation trial: rationale and design features

Elena Losina, Jamie E Collins, Meghan E Daigle, Laurel A Donnell-Fink, Julian J Z Prokopetz, Doris Strnad, Vladislav Lerner, Benjamin N Rome, Roya Ghazinouri, Debra J Skoniecki, Jeffrey N Katz, John Wright, Elena Losina, Jamie E Collins, Meghan E Daigle, Laurel A Donnell-Fink, Julian J Z Prokopetz, Doris Strnad, Vladislav Lerner, Benjamin N Rome, Roya Ghazinouri, Debra J Skoniecki, Jeffrey N Katz, John Wright

Abstract

Background: Utilization of total knee arthroplasty is increasing rapidly. A substantial number of total knee arthroplasty recipients have persistent pain after surgery. Our objective was to design a randomized controlled trial to establish the efficacy of a motivational-interviewing-based telephone intervention aimed at improving patient outcomes and satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty.

Methods/design: The study was conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The study focused on individuals 40 years or older with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis who were scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. The study compared two management strategies over the first six months postoperatively: 1) enhanced postoperative care with frequent follow-up by a care navigator; 2) usual postoperative care. Those who were randomized into the enhanced postoperative care arm received ten calls from a trained non-clinician care navigator over the first six postoperative months. The navigator used motivational interviewing techniques to engage patients in discussions related to their rehabilitation goals, including patient's plans for and confidence in achieving those goals. Patients in the usual care arm received standard postoperative management and received no navigator phone calls. Patients in both arms were assessed at baseline, three months, and six months postoperatively.

Discussion: The primary outcome of the study was improvement in function as measured by the difference in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function score between preoperative (baseline) status and six months postoperatively. Data were collected to identify factors that may be related to total knee arthroplasty outcomes, including preoperative pain, pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy, and depression. A formal economic analysis is also planned to determine the cost-effectiveness of the care navigator as a component of total knee arthroplasty care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01540851.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AViKA treatment arms. This figure depicts the two treatment arms of the AViKA study: the care navigator arm and the usual care arm. Patients in both arms received questionnaires at baseline and post-operative months three and six. Patients in the care navigator arm also receive regular phone calls from the care navigator. The time points designated in parenthesis indicate the post-operative time point (that is, “Call from care navigator (week 4)” indicates that the care navigator called the patient one month after the date of the patient’s TKA).

References

    1. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) [ ]
    1. Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;14(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435.
    1. Judge A, Arden NK, Cooper C, Kassim Javaid M, Carr AJ, Field RE, Dieppe PA. Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;14(10):1804–1813. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes075.
    1. Lopez-Olivo MA, Landon GC, Siff SJ, Edelstein D, Pak C, Kallen MA, Stanley M, Zhang H, Robinson KC, Suarez-Almazor ME. Psychosocial determinants of outcomes in knee replacement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;14(10):1775–1781. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.146423.
    1. Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Medical and psychological comorbidity predicts poor pain outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;14(5):916–23. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes402.
    1. Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Reijman M. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;14(4):576–588. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.003.
    1. Wylde V, Dixon S, Blom AW. The role of preoperative self-efficacy in predicting outcome after total knee replacement. Musculoskeletal Care. 2012;14(2):110–118. doi: 10.1002/msc.1008.
    1. Gabbay RA, Anel-Tiangco RM, Dellasega C, Mauger DT, Adelman A, Horn DH. Diabetes Nurse Case Management and Motivational Interviewing for Change (DYNAMIC): Results of a 2-year Randomized Controlled Pragmatic Trial. J Diabetes. 2013;14(3):349–57. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12030.
    1. Lovejoy TI. Telephone-delivered motivational interviewing targeting sexual risk behavior reduces depression, anxiety, and stress in HIV-positive older adults. Ann Behav Med. 2012;14(3):416–421. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9401-6.
    1. Rosal MC, Ayers D, Li W, Oatis C, Borg A, Zheng H, Franklin P. A randomized clinical trial of a peri-operative behavioral intervention to improve physical activity adherence and functional outcomes following total knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;14:226. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-226.
    1. Meier W, Mizner RL, Marcus RL, Dibble LE, Peters C, Lastayo PC. Total knee arthroplasty: muscle impairments, functional limitations, and recommended rehabilitation approaches. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;14(5):246–256. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2715.
    1. McConnaughy E, Prochaska J, Velicer W. Stages of change in psychotherapy: measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy. 1983;14:368–375.
    1. Prochaska J, Johnson S, Lee P. In: The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. 3. Shumaker S, Ockene J, Riekert K, editor. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. The transtheoretical model of behavior change; pp. 59–83.
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd Edition. 2. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002.
    1. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Michel BA, Stucki G. Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Journal of Rheumatol. 2002;14(1):131–138.
    1. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;14(4):384–391. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID-ART352>;2-0.
    1. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996;14(16):1339–1341. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540160061034.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;14(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅