Do adverts increase the probability of finding online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression? Cross-sectional study

Ray B Jones, Lesley Goldsmith, Paul Hewson, Maged N Kamel Boulos, Christopher J Williams, Ray B Jones, Lesley Goldsmith, Paul Hewson, Maged N Kamel Boulos, Christopher J Williams

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effect of online adverts on the probability of finding online cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression.

Design: Exploratory online cross-sectional study of search experience of people in the UK with depression in 2011. (1) The authors identified the search terms over 6 months entered by users who subsequently clicked on the advert for online help for depression. (2) A panel of volunteers across the UK recorded websites presented by normal Google search for the term 'depression'. (iii) The authors examined these websites to estimate probabilities of knowledgeable and naive internet users finding online CBT and the improved probability by addition of a Google advert.

Participants: (1) 3868 internet users entering search terms related to depression into Google. (2) Panel, recruited online, of 12 UK participants with an interest in depression.

Main outcome measures: Probability of finding online CBT for depression with/without an advert.

Results: The 3868 users entered 1748 different search terms but the single keyword 'depression' resulted in two-thirds of the presentations of, and over half the 'clicks' on, the advert. In total, 14 different websites were presented to our panel in the first page of Google results for 'depression'. Four of the 14 websites had links enabling access to online CBT in three clicks for knowledgeable users. Extending this approach to the 10 most frequent search terms, the authors estimated probabilities of finding online CBT as 0.29 for knowledgeable users and 0.006 for naive users, making it unlikely CBT would be found. Adding adverts that linked directly to online CBT increased the probabilities to 0.31 (knowledgeable) and 0.02 (naive).

Conclusions: In this case, online CBT was not easy to find and online adverts substantially increased the chance for naive users. Others could use this approach to explore additional impact before committing to long-term Google AdWords advertising budgets.

Trial registration: This exploratory case study was a substudy within a cluster randomised trial, registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (reference: NCT01469689). (The trial will be reported subsequently).

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CJW is the designer and author of the LLTTF site.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Google advert.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of methods. CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screen shot from Royal College of Psychiatrists ‘depression’ landing page, showing (added labels) side bar menu, tool bar menu and additional information.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Screen shot from Royal College of Psychiatrists ‘depression’ landing page, showing link words in the body of the text and other headings that were not linked.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Section from second screen for http://www.RCPsych.ac.uk that has route to CCBT.

References

    1. Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, et al. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:858–66
    1. Powell J, Clarke A. Internet information-seeking in mental health: population survey. Br J Psychiatry 2006;189:273–7
    1. Buhi ER, Daley EM, Fuhrmann HJ, et al. An observational study of how young people search for online sexual health information. J Am Coll Health 2009;58:101–11
    1. Horgan Á, Sweeney J. Young students' use of the Internet for mental health information and support. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2010;17:117–23
    1. Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR, et al. Going online for health advice: changes in usage and trust practices over the last five years. Interact Comput 2007;19:397–406
    1. Ferreira-Lay P, Miller S. The quality of internet information on depression for lay people. Psychiatr Bull 2008;32:170–3
    1. Breckons M, Jones R, Morris J, et al. What do evaluation instruments tell us about the quality of complementary medicine information on the internet? J Med Internet Res 2008;10:e3.
    1. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287:2691–700
    1. Eysenbach G, Thomson M. The FA4CT algorithm: a new model and tool for consumers to assess and filter health information on the internet. In: Kuhn KA, Warren JR, Leong TY, eds. Medinfo 2007: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health. Amsterdam: I O S Press, 2007:142–6
    1. Fox S. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Online Health Search, 2006. (accessed 8 Nov 2011).
    1. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002;324:573–7
    1. Granka L, Joachims T, Gay G. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search. ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2004. (accessed 28 Feb 2012).
    1. Netmarketshare Search Engine Market Share. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. Schmidt E. Testimony Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights. 2011. (accessed 28 Feb 2012).
    1. Google Web Search Help: Location. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. Smyth B, Coyle M, Briggs P. Communities, Collaboration, and Recommender Systems in personalized web search. In: Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, et al., eds. Recommender Systems Handbook. New York: Springer US, 2011:579–614
    1. Google Support Basics: Search History Personalization. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. Toubiana V, Subramanian L, Nissenbaum H. TrackMeNot: Enhancing the Privacy of Web Search. 2011. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence Depression: The Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults (Update). 2009. (accessed 12 Dec 2011).
    1. Beating the Blues. (accessed 19 Feb 2012).
    1. Williams C. Living Life to the Full. (accessed 28 Feb 2012).
    1. The Australian National University MoodGYM. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. Jones R, Goldsmith L, Williams C. Raising Awareness of Online Therapies for Depression: Pilot Study. 2010. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. Estrada CA, Krishnamoorthy P, Smith A, et al. Marketing to increase participation in a web-based continuing medical education cultural competence curriculum. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2011;31:21–7
    1. Ramo DE, Hall SM, Prochaska JJ. Reaching young adult smokers through the internet: comparison of three recruitment mechanisms. Nicotine Tob Res 2010;12:768–75
    1. Google AdWords Help. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. Google Display Network. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann 2002;32:509–21
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004;328:265.
    1. Samaritans. (accessed 14 Dec 2011).
    1. NHS Choices NHS Choices, Your Health, Your Choices. Depression. (accessed 12 Dec 2011).
    1. Brown JS, Boardman J, Whittinger N, et al. Can a self-referral system help improve access to psychological treatments? Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:365–71
    1. Jorm AF, Griffiths KM, Christensen H, et al. Actions taken to cope with depression at different levels of severity: a community survey. Psychol Med 2004;34:293–9
    1. Gellatly J, Bower P, Hennessy S, et al. What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychol Med 2007;37:1217–28
    1. SIGN Guideline 114: Non-Pharmaceutical Treatment of Depression in Adults: A National Clinical Guideline. 2010. (accessed 19 May 2011).
    1. Wikipedia Clickthrough Rate. 2012. (accessed 27 Feb 2012).
    1. NHS Online Google Ads Come Under Fire. (accessed 20 Oct 2011).
    1. Fenner Y, Garland SM, Moore EE, et al. Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e20.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅