Medical Legal Aspects of Telemedicine in Italy: Application Fields, Professional Liability and Focus on Care Services During the COVID-19 Health Emergency

D Ferorelli, L Nardelli, L Spagnolo, S Corradi, M Silvestre, F Misceo, M Marrone, F Zotti, G Mandarelli, B Solarino, A Dell'Erba, D Ferorelli, L Nardelli, L Spagnolo, S Corradi, M Silvestre, F Misceo, M Marrone, F Zotti, G Mandarelli, B Solarino, A Dell'Erba

Abstract

Telemedicine services can be classified into the macro-categories of specialist Telemedicine, Tele-health and Tele-assistance. From a regulatory perspective, in Italy, the first provision dedicated to the implementation of Telemedicine services is represented by the Agreement between the Government and the Regions on the document bearing "Telemedicine-National guidelines," approved by the General Assembly of the Superior Health Council in the session of 10th July 2012 and by the State Regions Conference in the session of 20th February 2014. Scientifically, several studies in the literature state that information and communication technologies have great potential to reduce the costs of health care services in terms of planning and making appropriate decisions that provide timely tools to patients. Another clear benefit is the equity of access to health care. The evolution of telemedicine poses a series of legal problems ranging from the profiles on the subject of authorization and accreditation to those concerning the protection of patient confidentiality, the definition and solution of which, in the absence of specific regulatory provisions, is mainly left to the assessment of compatibility of the practices adopted so far, with the general regulatory framework. In terms of professional liability, it is necessary to first clarify that the telemedicine service is comparable to any diagnostic-therapeutic health service considering that the telemedicine service does not replace the traditional health service, but integrates the latter to improve its effectiveness, efficiency and appropriateness.

Keywords: Covid-19; legal medicine; medical professional liability; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Strehle EM, Shabde N. One hundred years of telemedicine: does this new technology have a place in paediatrics? Arch Dis Childh. 2006;91:956-959.
    1. Sood SP, Negash V, Mbarika VWA, Kifle M, Prakash N. Differences in public and private sector adoption of telemedicine: Indian case study for sectoral adoption. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;130:257-268.
    1. WHO. A health telematics policy in support of WHO’s Health-For-All strategy for global health development: report of the WHO group consultation on health telematics, 11–16 December, Geneva, 1997. Geneva, World Health Organization; 1998.
    1. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79:736-771.
    1. Combi C, Pozzani G, Pozzi G. Telemedicine for developing countries. A survey and some design issues. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7:1025-1050.
    1. Klaassen B, Van Beijnum BJF, Hermes HJ. Usability in telemedicine systems-A literature survey. Int J Med Inform. 2016;93:57-69.
    1. Weinstein RS, Krupinski EA, Doarn CR. Clinical examination component of telemedicine, telehealth, mHealth, and connected health medical practices. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102:533-544.
    1. Kushiniruk AW, Patel C, Patel VL, Cimino JJ. ‘Televaluation’ of clinical information systems: an integrative approach to assessing Web-based systems. Int J Med Inform. 2001;61:45-70.
    1. Barrett D. Rethinking presence: a grounded theory of nurses and teleconsultation. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26:3088-3098.
    1. Blatzinger M. Teleradiology in the TraumaNetwork DGU. Unfallchirurg. 2019;122:676-682.
    1. McLean S, Sheikh A, Cresswell K, et al. The impact of telehealthcare on the quality and safety of care: a systematic overview. PLoS One. 2013;19:8:e71238.
    1. Mortara A, Oliva F, Di Lenarda A. Prospettive della telemedicina e del monitoraggio mediante dispositivi nel paziente con scompenso cardiaco cronico: luci e ombre. G Ital Cardiol. 2010;11:33S-37S.
    1. Molinari G, Molinari M, Di Biase M, Brunetti ND. Telecardiology and its settings of application: an update. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:373-381.
    1. Martínez García MA, Fernández Rosales MS, López Domínguez E, Hernández Velázquez Y, Domínguez Isidro S. Telemonitoring system for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis: usability assessment based on a case study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0206600.
    1. Lee JY, Lee SWH. Telemedicine cost-effectiveness for diabetes management: a systematic review. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20:492-500.
    1. van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e202.
    1. De Cola MC, Maresca G, D’Aleo G, et al. Teleassistance for frail elderly people: a usability and customer satisfaction study. Geriatr Nurs. 2020;41:463-467.
    1. Goodini A, Torabi M, Goodarzi M, et al. The simulation model of teleradiology in telemedicine project. Health Care Manag. 2015;34:69-75.
    1. Wesson JB, Kupperschmidt B. Rural trauma telemedicine. J Trauma Nurs. 2013;20:199-202.
    1. Silverman RD. Current legal and ethical concerns in telemedicine and e-medicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9 Suppl 1:S67-S69.
    1. Riganti C, Santomauro M, Duilio C, et al. Responsibilities for the remote monitoring of heart failure patients. G Ital Cardiol. 2010;11:137S-142S.
    1. Stanberry B. The legal and ethical aspects of telemedicine. Data protection, security and european law. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4:18-24.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅