Development of a psychological intervention for fatigue after stroke
Simiao Wu, Trudie Chalder, Kirstin E Anderson, David Gillespie, Malcolm R Macleod, Gillian E Mead, Simiao Wu, Trudie Chalder, Kirstin E Anderson, David Gillespie, Malcolm R Macleod, Gillian E Mead
Abstract
Background and aim: Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is common and distressing, but there is insufficient evidence to recommend any effective treatment for it. Psychological interventions are effective in treating fatigue in other conditions. This paper describes the development and evaluation of the feasibility of a psychological intervention for PSF.
Methods: Based on psychological correlates of PSF and evidence-based psychological interventions for fatigue in other medical conditions, we developed a manualised psychological intervention for PSF, with input from stroke clinicians, psychological therapists, and stroke survivors. The intervention was delivered by a clinical psychologist to 12 participants with PSF to test its acceptability and feasibility. According to the feedback from participants and therapists, the intervention was refined for future use.
Results: The intervention consisted of six individual, face-to-face treatment sessions, and one follow-up, telephone-delivered booster session. It included psycho-education and discussion of strategies to promote physical and social activities and to challenge unhelpful thoughts. Four participants dropped out and the remaining eight participants completed the intervention. These eight participants also completed all assessments and feedback and reported fatigue levels as lower at the end of the study than at the baseline. All participants reported favourable opinions on the intervention and suggested that the last two treatment sessions be combined and the booster session be delivered in person as opposed to telephone.
Conclusions: This psychological intervention was acceptable to stroke patients and was feasible in the local health service. These findings suggest that a randomised controlled trial to test efficacy is warranted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
- Michael K. Fatigue and stroke. Rehabilitation Nursing. 2002;27(3):89–94.
- Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Poststroke fatigue: a 2-year follow-up study of stroke patients in Sweden. Stroke. 2002;33(5):1327–33.
- Armes J, Chalder T, Addington-Hall J, Richardson A, Hotopf M. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief, behaviorally oriented intervention for cancer-related fatigue. Cancer. 2007;110(6):1385–95. doi:
- White P, Goldsmith K, Johnson A, Potts L, Walwyn R, DeCesare J, et al. Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial. The Lancet. 2011;377(9768):823–36.
- Wu S, Kutlubaev MA, Chun HYY, Cowey E, Pollock A, Macleod MR, et al. Interventions for post-stroke fatigue. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015(7): Art. No.: CD007030. doi:
- Zedlitz AM, Visser-Meily AJ, Schepers VP, Geurts AC, Fasotti L. Patients with severe poststroke fatigue show a psychosocial profile comparable to patients with other chronic disease: implications for diagnosis and treatment. ISRN Neurol. 2011;2011: doi:
- Zedlitz AM, Rietveld TC, Geurts AC, Fasotti L. Cognitive and graded activity training can alleviate persistent fatigue after stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1046–51. doi:
- Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655 doi:
- Wu S, Barugh A, Macleod M, Mead G. Psychological associations of poststroke fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2014. June 1, 2014;45(6):1778–83. doi:
- Wu S, Mead G, Macleod M, Chalder T. Model of understanding fatigue after stroke. Stroke. 2015;46:893–8. doi:
- Williams C, Carson A, Smith S, Sharpe M, Cavanagh J, Kent C. Overcoming functional neurological symptoms: a five areas approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.
- Beck JS. Cognitive behavior therapy: basics and beyond. 2nd ed New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
- Burgess M, Chalder T. Overcoming chronic fatigue: A self-help guide using cognitive behavioural techniques. 2nd ed London: Constable & Robinson Ltd; 2005.
- Barak S, Duncan PW. Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx. 2006;3(4):505–24. doi:
- World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)2001: .
- Lynch J, Mead G, Greig C, Young A, Lewis S, Sharpe M. Fatigue after stroke: the development and evaluation of a case definition. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2007;63(5):539–44. doi:
- Michielsen HJ, De Vries J, Van Heck GL, Van de Vijver FJ, Sijtsma K. Examination of the dimensionality of fatigue: the construction of the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2004;20(1):39–48.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001;16(9):606–13. doi:
- Nouri F, Lincoln N. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1987;1(4):301–5.
- Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, Perera S, Investigators GAiNA. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;84(7):950–63.
- Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2010;10(1):67.
- Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in nursing & health. 2008;31(2):180–91.
- Thomas S, Thomas P, Nock A, Slingsby V, Galvin K, Baker R, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a cognitive behavioural approach to fatigue management in people with multiple sclerosis. Patient Education and Counseling. 2010;78(2):240–9. doi:
- Thomas S, Thomas PW, Kersten P, Jones R, Green C, Nock A, et al. A pragmatic parallel arm multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based fatigue management programme (FACETS) for people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2013;84:1092–9.
- Rothwell K, Boaden R, Bamford D, Tyrrell PJ. Feasibility of assessing the needs of stroke patients after six months using the GM-SAT. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2013;27(3):264–71. doi:
- Bowen A, Knapp P, Hoffman A, Lowe D. Psychological services for people with stroke: compliance with the U.K. National Clinical Guidelines. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2005;19(3):323–30. doi:
Source: PubMed