Randomized Trial of 2 Delayed-Release Formulations of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation

William D Chey, Gregory S Sayuk, Wilmin Bartolini, David S Reasner, Susan M Fox, Wieslaw Bochenek, Ramesh Boinpally, Elizabeth Shea, Kenneth Tripp, Niels Borgstein, William D Chey, Gregory S Sayuk, Wilmin Bartolini, David S Reasner, Susan M Fox, Wieslaw Bochenek, Ramesh Boinpally, Elizabeth Shea, Kenneth Tripp, Niels Borgstein

Abstract

Introduction: Immediate-release (IR) formulation of linaclotide 290 μg improves abdominal pain and constipation (APC) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation. Delayed-release (DR) formulations were developed on the premise that targeting the ileum (delayed-release formulation 1 [DR1]) or ileocecal junction and cecum (MD-7246, formerly DR2) would modulate linaclotide's secretory effects while preserving pain relief effects.

Methods: This phase 2b study randomized patients with IBS with constipation to placebo or 1 of 7 once-daily linaclotide doses (DR1 30, 100, or 300 μg; MD-7246 30, 100, or 300 μg; or IR 290 μg) for 12 weeks. Key efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in abdominal pain and complete spontaneous bowel movement frequency, and 6/12-week combined APC+1 responder rate.

Results: Overall, 532 patients were randomized; mean age was 45.1 years, and most were women (83.3%) and White (64.7%). All linaclotide DR1 and MD-7246 groups experienced greater improvements in abdominal pain from baseline and vs placebo throughout treatment. Linaclotide DR1 and IR led to numerically greater improvements from baseline in complete spontaneous bowel movement frequency and higher APC+1 responder rates compared with placebo; MD-7246 results were similar to placebo. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event with DR1 and IR; rates were similar between MD-7246 and placebo.

Discussion: Altering the site of drug delivery in the intestine might uncouple linaclotide's pain relief from secretory effects. Persistent, modest abdominal pain improvement with limited impact on bowel symptom parameters, as seen across MD-7246 doses, warrants further study of MD-7246 as a novel treatment for abdominal pain, regardless of IBS subtype.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02559206.

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor of the article: Wilmin Bartolini, PhD.

Specific author contributions: W.B., D.S.R., S.M.F., W.B., and K.T. contributed to the conception and design of the study. D.S.R. and K.T. contributed to the analysis of the data. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and drafting, critical revision, and final approval of the manuscript.

Financial support: This study was sponsored by Allergan plc (before acquisition by AbbVie, Inc.) and/or AbbVie, Inc. and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Writing and editorial assistance was provided to the authors by Brittany Y. Jarrett, PhD, and Rebecca Fletcher, BA(Hons), of Complete HealthVizion, Inc., Chicago, IL, and funded by Allergan plc and/or AbbVie, Inc., and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All authors met the ICJME authorship criteria. Neither honoraria nor payments were made for authorship.

Potential competing interests: Financial arrangements of the authors with companies whose products might be related to this report are listed as follows, as declared by the authors: W.D.C. has served as a consultant for Allergan plc (before acquisition by AbbVie, Inc.), Alnylam, Arena, Biomerica, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., IM Health, QOL Medical, Outpost, Ritter, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Urovant Sciences and received research grants from Biomerica, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Commonwealth Diagnostic International, QOL Medical, Salix, Urovant Sciences, Vibrant, and Zespri. G.S.S. has served as a consultant and speaker for Allergan plc (before acquisition by AbbVie, Inc.), Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Salix Pharmaceuticals. W.B., E.S., and N.B. are employees of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and have held or currently hold stock and stock options. D.S.R. and K.T. are former employees of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and have held or currently hold stock and stock options. S.M.F., W.B., and R.B. are employees of AbbVie, Inc., and hold stock and stock options.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02559206).

Copyright © 2020 by The American College of Gastroenterology.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. DR1, delayed-release formulation 1; IR, immediate-release formulation; LIN, linaclotide; PBO, placebo.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Weekly CFB in abdominal pain. Treatment effects of (a) LIN DR1 30 μg, 100 μg, and 300 μg and (b) MD-7246 30 μg, 100 μg, and 300 μg are shown with respect to LIN 290 μg IR and PBO, with 12-week LS mean differences vs PBO reported in each legend. All 8 treatment groups were evaluated in a single model, wherein treatment group was included as a fixed effect. CFB, change from baseline; CI, confidence interval; DR1, delayed-release formulation 1; IR, immediate-release formulation; LIN, linaclotide; LS, least-squares; PBO, placebo.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Weekly CFB in CSBM frequency. Treatment effects of (a) LIN DR1 30 μg, 100 μg, and 300 μg and (b) MD-7246 30 μg, 100 μg, and 300 μg are shown with respect to LIN 290 μg IR and PBO, with 12-week LS mean differences vs PBO reported in each legend.All 8 treatment groups were evaluated in a single model, wherein treatment group was included as a fixed effect. CFB, change from baseline; CI, confidence interval; CSBM, complete spontaneous bowel movement; DR1, delayed-release formulation 1; IR, immediate-release formulation; LIN, linaclotide; LS, least-squares; PBO, placebo.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Percentage of patients with diarrhea TEAEs, including those leading to discontinuation. The proportion of patients with diarrhea TEAEs leading to discontinuation (grey) is shown as a subset of the total population with ≥1 diarrhea TEAE in each treatment group. DR1, delayed-release formulation 1; IR, immediate-release formulation; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

References

    1. Drossman DA. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: History, pathophysiology, clinical features, and Rome IV. Gastroenterology 2016;150:1262–79.
    1. Lacy BE, Mearin F, Chang L et al. . Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2016;150:1393–407.e5.
    1. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:712–21.
    1. Drossman DA, Morris CB, Schneck S et al. . International survey of patients with IBS: Symptom features and their severity, health status, treatments, and risk taking to achieve clinical benefit. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:541–50.
    1. Ballou S, McMahon C, Lee H-N et al. . Effects of irritable bowel syndrome on daily activities vary among subtypes based on results from the IBS in America survey. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17:2471–8.
    1. Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1377–90.
    1. American Gastroenterological Association. IBS in America: Survey summary findings. 2015. (). Accessed October 5, 2016.
    1. Ford AC, Moayyedi P, Chey WD et al. . American College of Gastroenterology monograph on management of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:1–18.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Linzess highlights of prescribing information. 2017. (). Accessed February 28, 2019.
    1. Bryant AP, Busby RW, Bartolini WP et al. . Linaclotide is a potent and selective guanylate cyclase C agonist that elicits pharmacological effects locally in the gastrointestinal tract. Life Sci 2010;86:760–5.
    1. Busby RW, Kessler MM, Bartolini WP et al. . Pharmacologic properties, metabolism, and disposition of linaclotide, a novel therapeutic peptide approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and chronic idiopathic constipation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013;344:196–206.
    1. Tchernychev B, Ge P, Kessler MM et al. . MRP4 modulation of the guanylate cyclase-c/cGMP pathway: Effects on linaclotide-induced electrolyte secretion and cGMP efflux. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2015;355:48–56.
    1. Busby RW, Bryant AP, Bartolini WP et al. . Linaclotide, through activation of guanylate cyclase C, acts locally in the gastrointestinal tract to elicit enhanced intestinal secretion and transit. Eur J Pharmacol 2010;649:328–35.
    1. Castro J, Harrington AM, Hughes PA et al. . Linaclotide inhibits colonic nociceptors and relieves abdominal pain via guanylate cyclase-c and extracellular cyclic guanosine 3', 5'-monophosphate. Gastroenterology 2013;145:1334–46.e11.
    1. Eutamene H, Bradesi S, Larauche M et al. . Guanylate cyclase C-mediated antinociceptive effects of linaclotide in rodent models of visceral pain. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010;22:312–e84.
    1. Grundy L, Harrington AM, Castro J et al. . Chronic linaclotide treatment reduces colitis-induced neuroplasticity and reverses persistent bladder dysfunction. JCI Insight 2018;3:e121841.
    1. Ligon C, Mohammadi E, Ge P et al. . Linaclotide inhibits colonic and urinary bladder hypersensitivity in adult female rats following unpredictable neonatal stress. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018;30:e13375.
    1. Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Lavins BJ et al. . Linaclotide for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: A 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1702–12.
    1. Rao S, Lembo AJ, Shiff SJ et al. . A 12-week, randomized, controlled trial with a 4-week randomized withdrawal period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1714–24.
    1. Nee JW, Johnston JM, Shea EP et al. . Safety and tolerability of linaclotide for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: Pooled phase 3 analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;13:397–406.
    1. Kellow JE, Eckersley GM, Jones MP. Enhanced perception of physiological intestinal motility in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1621–7.
    1. Azpiroz F, Bouin M, Camilleri M et al. . Mechanisms of hypersensitivity in IBS and functional disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2007;19:62–88.
    1. Hughes PA, Castro J, Harrington AM et al. . Increased κ-opioid receptor expression and function during chronic visceral hypersensitivity. Gut 2014;63:1199–200.
    1. Kuo B, Bartolini W, Tripp K et al. . MD-7246, a delayed-release formulation of linaclotide targeting visceral pain associated with IBS-D, does not impact bowel frequency or stool consistency in healthy volunteers: Results from phase I trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114 (Abstract 497).
    1. Whitehead WE, Holtkotter B, Enck P et al. . Tolerance for rectosigmoid distention in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1990;98:1187–92.
    1. Bradette M, Delvaux M, Staumont G et al. . Evaluation of colonic sensory thresholds in IBS patients using a barostat: Definition of optimal conditions and comparison with healthy subjects. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:449–57.
    1. Mertz H, Naliboff B, Munakata J et al. . Altered rectal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1995;109:40–52.
    1. Caldarella MP, Milano A, Laterza F et al. . Visceral sensitivity and symptoms in patients with constipation- or diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): Effect of a low-fat intraduodenal infusion. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:383–9.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Irritable bowel syndrome - clinical evaluation of products for treatment. 2012. (). Accessed October 16, 2014.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅