The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth

Saraswathi Vedam, Kathrin Stoll, Nicholas Rubashkin, Kelsey Martin, Zoe Miller-Vedam, Hermine Hayes-Klein, Ganga Jolicoeur, CCinBC Steering Council, Saraswathi Vedam, Kathrin Stoll, Nicholas Rubashkin, Kelsey Martin, Zoe Miller-Vedam, Hermine Hayes-Klein, Ganga Jolicoeur, CCinBC Steering Council

Abstract

Background: Abuse of human rights in childbirth are documented in low, middle and high resource countries. A systematic review across 34 countries by the WHO Research Group on the Treatment of Women During Childbirth concluded that there is no consensus at a global level on how disrespectful maternity care is measured. In British Columbia, a community-led participatory action research team developed a survey tool that assesses women's experiences with maternity care, including disrespect and discrimination.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was completed by women of childbearing age from diverse communities across British Columbia. Several items (31/130) assessed characteristics of their communication with care providers. We assessed the psychometric properties of two versions of a scale (7 and 14 items), among women who described experiences with a single maternity provider (n=2514 experiences among 1672 women). We also calculated the proportion and selected characteristics of women who scored in the bottom 10th percentile (those who experienced the least respectful care).

Results: To demonstrate replicability, we report psychometric results separately for three samples of women (S1 and S2) (n=2271), (S3, n=1613). Analysis of item-to-total correlations and factor loadings indicated a single construct 14-item scale, which we named the Mothers on Respect index (MORi). Items in MORi assess the nature of respectful patient-provider interactions and their impact on a person's sense of comfort, behavior, and perceptions of racism or discrimination. The scale exhibited good internal consistency reliability. MORi- scores among these samples differed by socio-demographic profile, health status, experience with interventions and mode of birth, planned and actual place of birth, and type of provider.

Conclusion: The MOR index is a reliable, patient-informed quality and safety indicator that can be applied across jurisdictions to assess the nature of provider-patient relationships, and access to person-centered maternity care.

Keywords: Childbirth; Human rights; Participatory research; Provider–patient communication; Psychometrics; Respectful maternity care; Scale development; Survey research.

References

    1. Abuya T., Warren C.E., Miller N., Njuki R., Ndwiga C., Maranga A., Bellows B. Exploring the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. PloS One. 2015;10(4):e0123606.
    1. American Medical Association (2006). Opinion 8.08 – Informed Consent. Retrieved on April 27, 2016 at
    1. Baker, S., & Precilla, Y. (2005). “I Felt as though I”d been in Jail’: Women’s Experiences of Maternity Care during Labour, Delivery and the Immediate Postpartum. Feminism & …. Retrieved from
    1. Bohren M.A., Vogel J.P., Hunter E.C., Lutsiv O., Makh S.K., Souza J.P., Gülmezoglu A.M. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Medicine. 2015;12(6)
    1. Bowser, D., & Hill, K. (2010). Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth report of a landscape analysis, 1–57. Retrieved from
    1. Brown, S. (1994). Missing voices: The experience of motherhood. Retrieved from
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) (2016). Canada’s strategy for patient-oriented research: Patient engagement framework at a glance. Retrieved on April 27, 2016 at
    1. Chalidze, L. (2009). Misinformed consent: Non-medical bases for American birth recommendations as a human rights issue. New York Law School Law Review, 54 N.Y.L.
    1. Cheyney M.J., Everson C., Burcher P. Homebirth transfers in the United States: Narratives of risk, fear, and mutual accommodation. Qualitative Health Research. 2014;24(4):443–456.
    1. Cheyney M.J. Homebirth as systems-challenging praxis: Knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace. Qualitative Health Research. 2008;18(2):254–267.
    1. Creedy, D., Shochet, I., & Horsfall, J. (2000). Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: Incidence and contributing factors. Birth. Retrieved from doi/
    1. Declercq, E. R., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., Applebaum, S., & Herrlich, A. (2013). Listening to Mothers: Pregnancy & Birth. New York: Childbirth Connection, May 2013. Retrieved on April 28, 2016 at
    1. Declercq E.R., Sakala C., Corry M.P., Applebaum S., Risher P. Maternity Center Association; New York: 2002. Listening to mothers: Report of the first national U.S. survey of women's childbearing experiences.
    1. Declercq E., Sakala C., Corry M.P., Applebaum S. Childbirth Connection; New York: 2006. Listening to mothers II: Report of the second national U.S. survey of women's childbearing experiences: Executive summary (Vol. October)
    1. European Court of Human Rights (2014a). Case of Konovalova vs. Russia. Retrieved from
    1. European Court of Human Rights (2014b). Case of Ternovszky v. Hungary. Retrieved from
    1. European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg (2014). Dubska and Krejzova v the Czech Republic. Retrieved from {“itemid”:[“001-148632”]}.
    1. Fraser, D. (1999). Women’s perceptions of midwifery care: A longitudinal study to shape curriculum development. Birth. Retrieved from 〈.
    1. Fox D., Sheehan A., Homer C. Experiences of women planning a home birth who require intrapartum transfer to hospital: A metasynthesis of the qualitative literature. International Journal of Childbirth. 2014;4(2):103–119.
    1. Freedman L.P., Ramsey K., Abuya T., Bellows B., Ndwiga C., Warren C.E., Kujawski S., Moyo W., Kruk M.E., Mbaruku G. Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: A research, policy and rights agenda. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(12):915–917.
    1. Hodnett E.D., Downe S., Walsh D. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;(8)
    1. Hodnett E.D. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186:S160–S172.
    1. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, International Confederation of Midwives, White Ribbon Alliance, International Pediatric Association, & World Health Organization. Mother-baby friendly birthing facilities. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 128 2015 95 99 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.013.
    1. Jackson M., Dahlen H., Schmied V. Birthing outside the system: Perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths. Midwifery. 2012;28(5):561–567.
    1. Jou J., Kozhimannil K.B., Johnson P.J., Sakala C. Patient-perceived pressure from clinicians for labor induction and cesarean delivery: A Population-based survey of U.S. women. Health Services Research. 2015;50(4):961–981.
    1. Kruk M., Kujawski S., Mbaruku G., Ramsey K., Moyo W., Freedm Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: A facility and community survey. Health Policy and Planning. 2014:1–8.
    1. Kruske S., Young K., Jenkinson B., Catchlove A. Maternity care providers' perceptions of women’s autonomy and the law. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13(1):84.
    1. Kujawski S., MbarukuLynn G., Freedman L.P., Ramsey K., Moyo W., Kruk M.E. Association between disrespect and abuse during childbirth and women’s confidence in health facilities in Tanzania. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2015;19(10):2243–2250.
    1. Lindgren H., Erlandsson K. Women's experiences of empowerment in a planned home birth: A Swedish population-based study. Birth. 2010;37:309–317.
    1. Lothian J.A. Being safe: Making the decision to have a planned home birth in the United States. Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2013;24(3):266–275.
    1. Lukasse, M., Schroll, A., & Karro, H. (2015). Prevalence of experienced abuse in healthcare and associated obstetric characteristics in six European countries. Acta Obstetricia et. Retrieved from 〈.
    1. McRae D.N., Muhajarine N., Stoll K., Mayhew M., Vedam S., Mpofu D., Janssen P. Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care. SSM – Population Health. 2016;2:182–193.
    1. Middlesex Superior Court (1993). Meador v. Stahler and Gheridian. California.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2014). Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies: Guidance and guidelines. Retrieved on April 27, 2016 at
    1. Okafor I.I., Ugwu E.O., Obi S.N. Disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in a low-income country. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2015;128(2):110–113.
    1. Oviedo (1997). Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine. Council of Europe. Retrieved from
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. What Mothers Say: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Ottawa, 2009. .
    1. Reis, V., Deller, B., Carr, C. & Smith, J. (2012). Respectful maternity care country experiences. USAID maternal child health integrated program. Retrieved on April 28, 2016 at
    1. Roberts A.R., Yeager K.R. Evidence-based practice manual: research and outcome measures in health and human services. 1st ed. Oxford University Press; 2004.
    1. Sandall J., Soltani H., Gates S., Shennan A., Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;9
    1. Scupholme A., Paine L.L., Lang J.M., Kumar S., DeJoseph J.F. Time associated with components of clinical services rendered by nurse-midwives: Sample data from phase II of nurse-midwifery care to vulnerable populations in the United States. Journal of Nurse – Midwifery. 1994;39(1):5–12.
    1. Sheferaw E.D., Mengesha T.Z., Wase S.B. Development of a tool to measure women's perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016;16(1):67.
    1. Soet J.E., Brack G.A., Dilorio C. Prevalence and predictors of women's experience of psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth. 2003;30(1):36–46. (Retrieved from)
    1. Supreme Court of the State of New York (2014). Dray v. Staten Island University Hospital. Retrieved on April 27, 2016 at
    1. Swahnberg I.M.K., Wijma B. The NorVold Abuse Questionnaire (NorAQ): Validation of new measures of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and abuse in the health care system among women. European Journal of Public Health. 2003;13(4):361–366.
    1. Swahnberg K., Schei B., Hilden M., Halmesmäki E., Sidenius K., Steingrimsdottir T., Wijma B. Patients' experiences of abuse in health care: A Nordic study on prevalence and associated factors in gynecological patients. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(3):349–356.
    1. Symon A., Winter C., Donnan P.T., Kirkham M. Examining autonomy's boundaries: A follow-up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery. Birth. 2010;37(4):280–287.
    1. Ten Hoope-Bender P., de Bernis L., Campbell J., Downe S., Fauveau V., Fogstad H. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1226–1235.
    1. Thomson G., Dykes F., Singh G., Cawley L., Dey P. A public health perspective of women’s experiences of antenatal care: An exploration of insights from a community consultation. Midwifery. 2013;29(3):211–216.
    1. United Kingdom Supreme Court (2015). Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. Retrieved on April 27, 2016 at
    1. United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (2016). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Retrieved March 30, 2016, from
    1. Vedam S., Leeman L., Cheyney M., Fisher T., Myers S., Low L., Ruhl C. Transfer from planned home birth to hospital: Improving interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health. 2014;59(6):624–634.
    1. Vedam, S., Stoll, K., DeClercq, E., et al. (2016). Giving voice to mothers of colour. International Normal Labour and Birth Research Conference, 11th session. University of Western Sydney, Australia
    1. Vedam, S., Stoll, K., Jolicouer, G., Martin, K., et al. (2016). Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care. Society of Obstetricians and Gynecology Annual General Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia
    1. Vedam, S., Stoll, K., Jolicoeur, G., Partridge, S., Tashlykova, A., Korchinski, M., & Timmerman, N. (2015). Measuring women’s autonomy and experience of respectful maternity care. XXI FIGO World Congress of Gynecology & Obstetrics, October 2015, Vancouver, BC.
    1. Vogel J.P., Bohren M.A., Tunçalp Ö., Oladapo O.T., Adanu R.M., Baldé M.D., Gülmezoglu M.A. How women are treated during facility-based childbirth: Development and validation of measurement tools in four countries – Phase 1 formative research study protocol. Reproductive Health. 2015;12:60.
    1. Warren C., Njuki R., Abuya T., Ndwiga C., Maingi G., Serwanga J., Bellows B. Study protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13:21.
    1. White Ribbon Alliance (2015). Pulling back the curtain on disrespect and abuse: The movement to ensure respectful maternity care. Retrieved on April 4, 2016 at
    1. World Health Organization . World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2015. WHO | Prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during childbirth. (Retrieved from)

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅