The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) Responsive Parenting Intervention for Firstborns Affects Dietary Intake of Secondborn Infants

Emily E Hohman, Jennifer S Savage, Leann L Birch, Ian M Paul, Emily E Hohman, Jennifer S Savage, Leann L Birch, Ian M Paul

Abstract

Background: Although previous work has shown that children with older siblings tend to have poorer diet quality, no study has directly compared diets of infant siblings.

Objective: The goals of this analysis were to examine birth-order differences in dietary intake between firstborn (FB) and secondborn (SB) siblings, and to determine whether a responsive parenting (RP) intervention modified birth-order effects on diet.

Methods: The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) study randomly assigned first-time mothers to an RP intervention, which included guidance on feeding, sleep, soothing, and interactive play, or control. INSIGHT mothers who delivered a second child enrolled in an observation-only study of their SB infant (SIBSIGHT). Mothers completed FFQs for both children at ages 6 (n = 97 sibling pairs) and 12 (n = 100) mo. FB compared with SB intake of food groups of interest were compared, and the moderating effect of the RP intervention on birth-order differences was tested using generalized linear mixed models.

Results: Though FBs and SBs had similar diets, more FBs than SBs consumed 100% fruit juice at both 6 (13.8 compared with 3.2%, P = 0.006) and 12 mo (46.0 compared with 32.0%, P = 0.01). SBs consumed fruit more frequently (FB 2.8 compared with SB 3.2 times/d, P = 0.01), and were more likely to consume fried potatoes (FB 38.4 compared with SB 57.6%, P = 0.0009) and processed meats (FB 43.0 compared with SB 58.0%, P = 0.02) than FBs at 12 mo. There were no differences by birth order in intake of sweets, snacks, or sugar-sweetened beverages at 12 mo. At 12 mo, RP-group SBs ate vegetables more times per day (3.2) than control SBs (2.2, P = 0.01). RP-SBs also consumed a greater variety of vegetables (10.2) than control-SBs (7.9, P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Birth order is not consistently associated with healthy or unhealthy infant dietary intake. However, an RP intervention delivered to first-time mothers may benefit subsequent infants' vegetable intake. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01167270.

Keywords: birth order; dietary intake; infant; responsive parenting; siblings.

Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study participant flow diagram for INSIGHT (firstborn) and SIBSIGHT (secondborn) participants. First-time mothers were randomly assigned to the INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention or control group. Mothers who delivered a second child were invited to also participate in SIBSIGHT, an observation-only cohort. INSIGHT, Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories; RP, responsive parenting.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percent of FB and SB siblings consuming energy-dense food and beverage items at age 12 mo. N = 100 dyads, except for fried potatoes and fried chicken/fish where n = 99 dyads. *Significant difference between FB and SB, McNemar's test P < 0.05. Similar results were obtained from generalized linear mixed model including study group and age at questionnaire completion as covariates. FB, firstborn; SB, secondborn; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅