Treatment of spontaneous preterm labour with retosiban: a phase II pilot dose-ranging study

Steven Thornton, Guillermo Valenzuela, Charlotte Baidoo, Michael J Fossler, Timothy H Montague, Linda Clayton, Marcy Powell, Jerry Snidow, Brendt Stier, David Soergel, Steven Thornton, Guillermo Valenzuela, Charlotte Baidoo, Michael J Fossler, Timothy H Montague, Linda Clayton, Marcy Powell, Jerry Snidow, Brendt Stier, David Soergel

Abstract

Aims: The aims of the present study were to investigate the maternal, fetal and neonatal safety and tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) retosiban in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour (PTL) between 340/7 and 356/7 weeks' gestation.

Methods: In parts A and B of a three-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, women were randomized 3:1 (Part A) or 2:1 (Part B) to either 12-h IV retosiban followed by a single dose of oral placebo (R-P) or 12-h IV placebo followed by single-dose oral retosiban (P-R).

Results: A total of 29 women were randomized; 20 to R-P and nine to P-R. An integrated analysis found that adverse events were infrequent in mothers/newborns and consistent with events expected in the population under study or associated with confounding factors. Retosiban was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with an observed half-life of 1.45 h. Efficacy analyses included 19 women. While not statistically significant, those receiving R-P more frequently achieved uterine quiescence in 6 h (R-P, 63%; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 38, 84; P-R, 43%; 95% CrI: 12, 78) and more achieved a reduction of ≥50% in uterine contractions in 6 h (R-P, 63%; 95% CrI: 38, 84; P-R, 29%; 95% CrI: 4, 64). The number of days to delivery was increased in women receiving R-P (median 26 days for R-P vs. 13 days for P-R).

Conclusions: Intravenous retosiban has a favourable safety and tolerability profile and might prolong pregnancies in women with PTL. The study provides the rationale and dosing strategy for further evaluation of the efficacy of retosiban in the treatment of PTL.

Keywords: bioavailability; pregnancy; randomized control trial.

© 2017 GlaxoSmithKline. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subject disposition. *Completed investigational product (IP), defined as having received at least 95% of the infusion. †Six subjects excluded owing to protocol violation. ‡Four subjects excluded owing to protocol violation. PD, pharmacodynamics; P‐R, placebo infusion over 12 h followed by a single oral dose of retosiban 125 mg; R‐P, retosiban infusion over 12 h followed by a single oral placebo dose
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maternal and fetal heart rate and maternal blood pressure. (A) Maternal and fetal heart rate. The dotted vertical line represents the end of the 12‐h intravenous (IV) retosiban infusion or administration of the oral dose. (B) Maternal blood pressure. The dotted vertical line represents the end of the 12‐h IV infusion and administration of the oral dose. Error bars represent the 95% Confidence interval
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean plasma retosiban concentration–time plot. The solid line is the mean predicted from the pharmacokinetic model, and the open circles are the observed concentration data from the 14 patients who received the 12‐h intravenous infusion of retosiban and were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of days to delivery following treatment initiation. Middle line is the median, outer edge of box is the 25th and 75th quantile and the whiskers represent the min and max values

References

    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists , Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics . ACOG practice bulletin no. 127: management of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 1308–1317.
    1. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008; 371: 261–269.
    1. Petrini JR, Dias T, McCormick MC, Massolo ML, Green NS, Escobar GJ. Increased risk of adverse neurological development for late preterm infants. J Pediatr 2009; 154: 169–176.
    1. Ananth CV, Friedman AM, Gyamfi‐Bannerman C. Epidemiology of moderate preterm, late preterm and early term delivery. Clin Perinatol 2013; 40: 601–610.
    1. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 31–38.
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012; 379: 2162–2172.
    1. March of Dimes 2015 premature birth report card. Available at (last accessed December 2016).
    1. McLaurin KK, Hall CB, Jackson EA, Owens OV, Mahadevia PJ. Persistence of morbidity and cost differences between late‐preterm and term infants during the first year of life. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 653–659.
    1. Berard A, Le Tiec M, De Vera MA. Study of the costs and morbidities of late‐preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97: F329–F334.
    1. Blanks AM, Thornton S. The role of oxytocin in parturition. BJOG 2003; 110 (Suppl. 20): 46–51.
    1. Fuchs AR, Fuchs F, Husslein P, Soloff MS. Oxytocin receptors in the human uterus during pregnancy and parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 734–741.
    1. Goodwin TM, Paul R, Silver H, Spellacy W, Parsons M, Chez R, et al. The effect of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban on preterm uterine activity in the human. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 474–478.
    1. Roos C, Spaanderman ME, Schuit E, Bloemenkamp KW, Bolte AC, Cornette J, et al. Effect of maintenance tocolysis with nifedipine in threatened preterm labor on perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2013; 309: 41–47.
    1. Romero R, Sibai BM, Sanchez‐Ramos L, Valenzuela GJ, Veille JC, Tabor B, et al. An oxytocin receptor antagonist (atosiban) in the treatment of preterm labor: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial with tocolytic rescue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1173–1183.
    1. Vogel JP, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Mori R, Lumbiganon P, Qureshi Z, et al. Use of antenatal corticosteroids and tocolytic drugs in preterm births in 29 countries: an analysis of the WHO Multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. Lancet 2014; 384: 1869–1877.
    1. Haas DM, Caldwell DM, Kirkpatrick P, McIntosh JJ, Welton NJ. Tocolytic therapy for preterm delivery: systematic review and network meta‐analysis. BMJ 2012; 345: e6226.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Tocolysis for women in preterm labour. Green‐top Guideline No. 1b 2011. Available at (last accessed June 2017).
    1. Neilson JP. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 189–190.
    1. Liddle J, Allen MJ, Borthwick AD, Brooks DP, Davies DE, Edwards RM, et al. The discovery of GSK221149A: a potent and selective oxytocin antagonist. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2008; 18: 90–94.
    1. Wilson RJ, Allen MJ, Nandi M, Giles H, Thornton S. Spontaneous contractions of myometrium from humans, non‐human primate and rodents are sensitive to selective oxytocin receptor antagonism in vitro . BJOG 2001; 108: 960–966.
    1. McCafferty GP, Pullen MA, Wu C, Edwards RM, Allen MJ, Woollard PM, et al. Use of a novel and highly selective oxytocin receptor antagonist to characterize uterine contractions in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 293: R299–R305.
    1. Thornton S, Miller H, Valenzuela G, Snidow J, Stier B, Fossler MJ, et al. Treatment of spontaneous preterm labour with retosiban: a phase 2 proof‐of‐concept study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80: 740–749.
    1. Dmitrienko A, Wang MD. Bayesian predictive approach to interim monitoring in clinical trials. Stat Med 2006; 25: 2178–2195.
    1. Fossler MJ, Rodgers C, Stier B, McBride T. Population pharmacokinetics of retosiban administered intravenously to healthy, pregnant females with uncomplicated pre‐term labor between 30 0/7 and 35 6/7 weeks' gestation [abstract]. Clin Pharm Drug Dev 2013; 2 (S1): 15.
    1. Southan C, Sharman JL, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Alexander SP, et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucl Acids Res 2016; 44 (Database Issue): D1054–D1068.
    1. Alexander SP, Davenport AP, Kelly E, Marrion N, Peters JA, Benson HE, et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein‐coupled receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2015; 172: 5744–5869.
    1. Anderson GD. Pregnancy‐induced changes in pharmacokinetics: a mechanistic‐based approach. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44: 989–1008.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅