Does inhalation injury predict mortality in burns patients or require redefinition?

Youngmin Kim, Dohern Kym, Jun Hur, Jaechul Yoon, Haejun Yim, Yong Suk Cho, Wook Chun, Youngmin Kim, Dohern Kym, Jun Hur, Jaechul Yoon, Haejun Yim, Yong Suk Cho, Wook Chun

Abstract

Inhalation injury is known to be an important factor in predicting mortality in burns patients. However, the diagnosis is complicated by the heterogeneous presentation and inability to determine the severity of inhalation injury. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical features of inhalation injury that affect mortality and the values that could predict the outcome more precisely in burns patients with inhalation injury. This retrospective observational study included 676 burns patients who were over 18 years of age and hospitalized in the Burns Intensive Care Unit between January 2012 and December 2015. We analyzed variables that are already known to be prognostic factors (age, percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) burned, and inhalation injury) and factors associated with inhalation injury (carboxyhemoglobin and PaO2/FiO2 [PF] ratio) by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Age group (odds ratio [OR] 1.069, p<0.001), %TBSA burned (OR 1.100, p<0.001), and mechanical ventilation (OR 3.774, p<0.001) were identified to be significant predictive factors. The findings for presence of inhalation injury, PF ratio, and carboxyhemoglobin were not statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression. Being in the upper inhalation group, the lower inhalation group, and having a PF ratio <100 were identified to be significant predictors only in univariate logistic regression analysis (OR 4.438, p<0.001; OR 2.379, p<0.001; and OR 2.765, p<0.001, respectively). History and physical findings are not appropriate for diagnosis of inhalation injury and do not predict mortality. Mechanical ventilation should be recognized as a risk factor for mortality in burns patients with inhalation injury.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Analysis of survival according to…
Fig 1. Analysis of survival according to inhalation injury (a) and PF ratio (b).
Significant survival differences by inhalation injury (p<0.001) and PF ratio (p<0.001) are seen. PF ratio, ratio of arterial O2 pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen; LOS, length of stay in hospital.

References

    1. Foster K, Holmes JHt. Inhalation Injury: State of the Science 2016. J Burn Care Res. 2017. Epub 2017/03/23. doi: .
    1. El-Helbawy RH, Ghareeb FM. Inhalation injury as a prognostic factor for mortality in burn patients. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2011;24(2):82–8. Epub 2012/01/21.
    1. You K, Yang HT, Kym D, Yoon J, Haejun Y, Cho YS, et al. Inhalation injury in burn patients: establishing the link between diagnosis and prognosis. Burns. 2014;40(8):1470–5. Epub 2014/11/20. doi: .
    1. Dries DJ, Endorf FW. Inhalation injury: epidemiology, pathology, treatment strategies. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine. 2013;21:31 Epub 2013/04/20. doi:
    1. Palmieri TL. Inhalation injury: research progress and needs. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(4):549–54. Epub 2007/05/16. doi: .
    1. Walker PF, Buehner MF, Wood LA, Boyer NL, Driscoll IR, Lundy JB, et al. Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review. Crit Care. 2015;19:351 Epub 2015/10/29. doi:
    1. Endorf FW, Gamelli RL. Inhalation injury, pulmonary perturbations, and fluid resuscitation. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28(1):80–3. Epub 2007/01/11. doi: .
    1. Tobiasen J, Hiebert JM, Edlich RF. The abbreviated burn severity index. Ann Emerg Med. 1982;11(5):260–2. Epub 1982/05/01. .
    1. Wachtel TL, Berry CC, Wachtel EE, Frank HA. The inter-rater reliability of estimating the size of burns from various burn area chart drawings. Burns. 2000;26(2):156–70. Epub 2000/03/15. .
    1. Colohan SM. Predicting prognosis in thermal burns with associated inhalational injury: a systematic review of prognostic factors in adult burn victims. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31(4):529–39. Epub 2010/06/05. doi: .
    1. Hassan Z, Wong JK, Bush J, Bayat A, Dunn KW. Assessing the severity of inhalation injuries in adults. Burns. 2010;36(2):212–6. Epub 2009/12/17. doi: .
    1. Ching JA, Shah JL, Doran CJ, Chen H, Payne WG, Smith DJ Jr. The evaluation of physical exam findings in patients assessed for suspected burn inhalation injury. J Burn Care Res. 2015;36(1):197–202. Epub 2014/11/26. doi: .
    1. Mackie DP, van Dehn F, Knape P, Breederveld RS, Boer C. Increase in early mechanical ventilation of burn patients: an effect of current emergency trauma management? J Trauma. 2011;70(3):611–5. Epub 2011/05/26. doi: .
    1. Mackie DP, Spoelder EJ, Paauw RJ, Knape P, Boer C. Mechanical ventilation and fluid retention in burn patients. J Trauma. 2009;67(6):1233–8; discussion 8. Epub 2009/12/17. doi: .
    1. Soni N, Williams P. Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost? British journal of anaesthesia. 2008;101(4):446–57. Epub 2008/09/11. doi: .
    1. Sutton T, Lenk I, Conrad P, Halerz M, Mosier M. Severity of Inhalation Injury is Predictive of Alterations in Gas Exchange and Worsened Clinical Outcomes. J Burn Care Res. 2017. Epub 2017/06/02. doi: .

Source: PubMed

3
订阅