Experiences of integrating community volunteers as extensions of the primary care team to help support older adults at home: a qualitative study

Jessica Gaber, Doug Oliver, Ruta Valaitis, Laura Cleghorn, Larkin Lamarche, Ernie Avilla, Fiona Parascandalo, David Price, Lisa Dolovich, Jessica Gaber, Doug Oliver, Ruta Valaitis, Laura Cleghorn, Larkin Lamarche, Ernie Avilla, Fiona Parascandalo, David Price, Lisa Dolovich

Abstract

Background: Increasing the integration of community volunteers into primary health care delivery has the potential to improve person-focused, coordinated care, yet the use of volunteers in primary care is largely unexplored. Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality (Health TAPESTRY) is a multi-component intervention involving trained community volunteers functioning as extensions of primary care teams, supporting care based on older adults' health goals and needs. This study aimed to gain an understanding of volunteer experiences within the program and client and health care provider perspectives on the volunteer role.

Methods: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach embedded in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Participants included Health TAPESTRY volunteers, health care providers, volunteer coordinator, and program clients, all connected to two primary care practice sites in a large urban setting in Ontario, Canada. Data collection included semi-structured focus groups and interviews with all participants, and the completion of a measure of attitudes toward older adults and self-efficacy for volunteers. Qualitative data were inductively coded and analyzed using a constant comparative approach. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results: Overall, 30 volunteers and 64 other participants (clients, providers, volunteer coordinator) were included. Themes included: 1. Volunteer training: "An investment in volunteers"; 2. Intergenerational volunteer pairing: "The best of both worlds"; 3. Understanding the volunteer role and its scope: "Lay people involved in care"; 4. Volunteers as extensions of primary care teams: "Being the eyes where they live"; 5. The disconnect between volunteers and the clinical team: "Is something being done?"; 6. "Learning… all the time": Impacts on volunteers; and 7. Clients' acceptance of volunteers.

Conclusions: This study showed that it is possible to integrate community volunteers into the primary care setting, adding human connections to deepen the primary care team's understanding of their patients. Program implementation suggestions that emerged included: using role play in training, making volunteer role boundaries and specifications clear, and making efforts to connect volunteers and the primary care team they are supporting. This exploration of stakeholder voices has the potential to help improve volunteer program uptake and acceptability, as well as volunteer recruitment, retention, and training.

Trial registration: For RCT: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02283723, November 5, 2014.

Keywords: Home visits; Interprofessional teams; Older adults; Primary care; Qualitative research; Volunteers.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Macinko J, Starfield B, Shi L. The contribution of primary care systems to health outcomes within Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, 1970-1998. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:831–865.
    1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83:457–502.
    1. Starfield B. Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS report 2012. Gac Sanit. 2012;26 Suppl 1:20–26.
    1. Van Lerberghe W, Evans T, Rasanathan K, Mechbal A. The world health report 2008 - primary health care: now more than ever. Geneva: The World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Gilburt H, Buck D, South J. Volunteering in general practice: opportunities and insights. London: The King's Fund; 2018.
    1. Ginis KA, Nigg CR, Smith AL. Peer-delivered physical activity interventions: an overlooked opportunity for physical activity promotion. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3:434–443.
    1. Webel AR, Okonsky J, Trompeta J, Holzemer WL. A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviors in adults. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:247–253.
    1. Thomas GN, Macfarlane DJ, Guo B, Cheung BM, McGhee SM, Chou KL, Deeks JJ, Lam TH, Tomlinson B. Health promotion in older Chinese: a 12-month cluster randomized controlled trial of pedometry and "peer support". Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:1157–1166.
    1. Dale J, Caramlau IO, Lindenmeyer A, Williams SM. Peer support telephone calls for improving health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8:4.
    1. Kaczorowski J, Chambers LW, Dolovich L, Paterson JM, Karwalajtys T, Gierman T, Farrell B, McDonough B, Thabane L, Tu K, et al. Improving cardiovascular health at population level: 39 community cluster randomised trial of cardiovascular health awareness program (CHAP) BMJ. 2011;342:d442.
    1. Sales VL, Ashraf MS, Lella LK, Huang J, Bhumireddy G, Lefkowitz L, Feinstein M, Kamal M, Caesar R, Cusick E, et al. Utilization of trained volunteers decreases 30-day readmissions for heart failure. J Card Fail. 2013;19:842–850.
    1. Carpenter GI, Demopoulos GR. Screening the elderly in the community: controlled trial of dependency surveillance using a questionnaire administered by volunteers. BMJ. 1990;300:1253–1256.
    1. Weber BA, Roberts BL, Yarandi H, Mills TL, Chumbler NR, Wajsman Z. The impact of dyadic social support on self-efficacy and depression after radical prostatectomy. J Aging Health. 2007;19:630–645.
    1. Mcneil JK. Effects of nonprofessional home visit programs for subclinically unhappy and unhealthy older adults. J Appl Gerontol. 1995;14:333–342.
    1. Pfeiffer PN, Heisler M, Piette JD, Rogers MA, Valenstein M. Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33:29–36.
    1. Wu CJ, Chang AM, Courtney M, Kostner K. Peer supporters for cardiac patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Int Nurs Rev. 2012;59:345–352.
    1. Buman MP, Giacobbi PR, Jr, Dzierzewski JM, Morgan AA, McCrae CS, Roberts BL, Marsiske M. Peer volunteers improve long-term maintenance of physical activity with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8:S257–S266.
    1. Dorgo S, Robinson KM, Bader J. The effectiveness of a peer-mentored older adult fitness program on perceived physical, mental, and social function. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009;21:116–122.
    1. Gagliardino JJ, Arrechea V, Assad D, Gagliardino GG, Gonzalez L, Lucero S, Rizzuti L, Zufriategui Z, Clark C., Jr Type 2 diabetes patients educated by other patients perform at least as well as patients trained by professionals. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013;29:152–160.
    1. Rose MA. Evaluation of a peer-education program on heart disease prevention with older adults. Public Health Nurs. 1992;9:242–247.
    1. Luger E, Dorner TE, Haider S, Kapan A, Lackinger C, Schindler K. Effects of a Home-Based and Volunteer-Administered Physical Training, Nutritional, and Social Support Program on Malnutrition and Frailty in Older Persons: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:671 e679–671 e616.
    1. Wertz RT, Weiss DG, Aten JL, Brookshire RH, Garcia-Bunuel L, Holland AL, Kurtzke JF, LaPointe LL, Milianti FJ, Brannegan R, et al. Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A veterans administration cooperative study. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:653–658.
    1. Thom DH, Ghorob A, Hessler D, De Vore D, Chen E, Bodenheimer TA. Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:137–144.
    1. Crane-Okada R, Freeman E, Kiger H, Ross M, Elashoff D, Deacon L, Giuliano AE. Senior peer counseling by telephone for psychosocial support after breast cancer surgery: effects at six months. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012;39:78–89.
    1. Haider R, Ashworth A, Kabir I, Huttly SR. Effect of community-based peer counsellors on exclusive breastfeeding practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial [see commments] Lancet. 2000;356:1643–1647.
    1. Waters DL, Hale LA, Robertson L, Hale BA, Herbison P. Evaluation of a peer-led falls prevention program for older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1581–1586.
    1. Meikle M, Wechsler E, Tupper A, Benenson M, Butler J, Mulhall D, Stern G. Comparative trial of volunteer and professional treatments of dysphasia after stroke. Br Med J. 1979;2:87–89.
    1. Anderson ND, Damianakis T, Kroger E, Wagner LM, Dawson DR, Binns MA, Bernstein S, Caspi E, Cook SL, Team B The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: a critical review and recommendations for future research. Psychol Bull. 2014;140:1505–1533.
    1. Jenkinson CE, Dickens AP, Jones K, Thompson-Coon J, Taylor RS, Rogers M, Bambra CL, Lang I, Richards SH. Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:773.
    1. Mosack KE, Patterson L, Brouwer AM, Wendorf AR, Ertl K, Eastwood D, Morzinski J, Fletcher K, Whittle J. Evaluation of a peer-led hypertension intervention for veterans: impact on peer leaders. Health Educ Res. 2013;28:426–436.
    1. Hainsworth J, Barlow J. Volunteers' experiences of becoming arthritis self-management lay leaders: "It's almost as if I've stopped aging and started to get younger!". Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:378–383.
    1. Handy F, Srinivasan N. Valuing volunteers: an economic evaluation of the net benefits of hospital volunteers. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2004;33:28–54.
    1. Scharlach AE. Estimating the value of volunteer-assisted community-based aging services: a case example. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2015;34:46–65.
    1. Hotchkiss RB, Unruh L, Fottler MD. The role, measurement, and impact of volunteerism in hospitals. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2014;43:1111–1128.
    1. International Labour Organization . Manual on the Measurement of Volunteer Work. 2011.
    1. Dolovich L, Oliver D, Lamarche L, Agarwal G, Carr T, Chan D, Cleghorn L, Griffith L, Javadi D, Kastner M, et al. A protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the health teams advancing patient experience: strengthening quality (health TAPESTRY) platform approach to promote person-focused primary healthcare for older adults. Implement Sci. 2016;11:49.
    1. Dolovich L, Oliver D, Lamarche L, Thabane L, Valaitis R, Agarwal G, Carr T, Foster G, Griffith L, Javadi D, et al. Combining volunteers and primary care teamwork to support health goals and needs of older adults: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Can Med Assoc J. 2019;191:E491.
    1. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:334–340.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
    1. Oliver D, Dolovich L, Lamarche L, Gaber J, Avilla E, Bhamani M, Price D. A volunteer program to connect primary care and the home to support the health of older adults: a community case study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018;5:48.
    1. Schneider EC, Altpeter M, Whitelaw N. An innovative approach for building health promotion program capacity: a generic volunteer training curriculum. Gerontologist. 2007;47:398–403.
    1. Valaitis R, Cleghorn L, Dolovich L, Agarwal G, Gaber J, Mangin D, Oliver D, Parascandalo F, Ploeg J, Risdon C. Examining Interprofessional Teams Structures and Processes in the Implementation of a Primary Care Intervention (Health TAPESTRY) for Older Adults Using Normalization Process Theory. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21:63.
    1. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, Rapley T, Ballini L, Ong BN, Rogers A, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:29.
    1. Reuben DB, Lee M, Davis JW, Jr, Eslami MS, Osterweil DG, Melchiore S, Weintraub NT. Development and validation of a geriatrics attitudes scale for primary care residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1425–1430.
    1. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Urdan T, Pajares F, editors. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. USA: Information Age Publishing; 2006. pp. 307–337.
    1. Bryman A. Social research methods. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
    1. NVivo qualitative data analysis Software 11 edition: QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2015.
    1. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1985.
    1. Collaborator Role Working Group. Collaborating to improve care: a practical guide for family medicine teachers and learners—the CanMEDS-FM collaborator role. Mississauga: The College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2017.
    1. Carter N, Valaitis RK, Lam A, Feather J, Nicholl J, Cleghorn L. Navigation delivery models and roles of navigators in primary care: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:96.
    1. Claxton-Oldfield S, Claxton-Oldfield J. Some common problems faced by hospice palliative care volunteers. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008;25:121–126.
    1. Chevrier F, Steuer R, MacKenzie J. Factors affecting satisfaction among community-based hospice volunteer visitors. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1994;11:30–37.
    1. George DR. Intergenerational volunteering and quality of life: mixed methods evaluation of a randomized control trial involving persons with mild to moderate dementia. Qual Life Res. 2011;20:987–995.
    1. George DR, Singer ME. Intergenerational volunteering and quality of life for persons with mild to moderate dementia: results from a 5-month intervention study in the United States. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;19:392–396.
    1. Dolovich L, Gaber J, Valaitis R, Ploeg J, Oliver D, Richardson J, Mangin D, Parascandalo F, Agarwal G. Exploration of volunteers as health connectors within a multicomponent primary care-based program supporting self-management of diabetes and hypertension. Health Soc Care Community. 2019.
    1. Ploeg J, Valaitis RK, Cleghorn L, Yous ML, Gaber J, Agarwal G, Kastner M, Mangin D, Oliver D, Parascandalo F, et al. Perceptions of older adults in Ontario, Canada on the implementation and impact of a primary care programme, health teams advancing patient experience: strengthening quality (health TAPESTRY): a descriptive qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e026257.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅