Point-of-care Ultrasonography for Detecting the Etiology of Unexplained Acute Respiratory and Chest Complaints in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis

Layton Lamsam, Laleh Gharahbaghian, Viveta Lobo, Layton Lamsam, Laleh Gharahbaghian, Viveta Lobo

Abstract

Introduction Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool in emergency departments. As the number and type of POCUS protocols expand, there is a need to validate their efficacy in comparison with current diagnostic standards. This study compares POCUS to chest radiography in patients with undifferentiated respiratory or chest complaints. Methods A prospective convenience sample of 59 adult patients were enrolled from those presenting with unexplained acute respiratory or chest complaints (and having orders for chest radiography) to a single emergency department in an academic tertiary-care hospital. After a brief educational session, a medical student, blinded to chest radiograph results, performed and interpreted images from the modified Rapid Assessment of Dyspnea in Ultrasound (RADiUS) protocol. The images were reviewed by a blinded ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physician and compared to chest radiography upon chart review. The primary "gold standard" endpoint diagnosis was the diagnosis at discharge. A secondary analysis was performed using the chest computed tomography (CT) diagnosis as the endpoint diagnosis in the subset of patients with chest CTs. Results When using diagnosis at discharge as the endpoint diagnosis, the modified RADiUS protocol had a higher sensitivity (79% vs. 67%) and lower specificity (71% vs. 83%) than chest radiography. When using chest CT diagnosis as the endpoint diagnosis (in the subset of patients with chest CTs), the modified RADiUS protocol had a higher sensitivity (76% vs. 65%) and lower specificity (71% vs. 100%) than chest radiography. The medical student performed and interpreted the 59 POCUS scans with 92% accuracy. Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS using the modified RADiUS protocol was not significantly different than chest radiography. In addition, a medical student was able to perform the protocol and interpret scans with a high level of accuracy. POCUS has potential value for diagnosing the etiology of undifferentiated acute respiratory and chest complaints in adult patients presenting to the emergency department, but larger clinical validation studies are required.

Keywords: bedside ultrasound; chest ct; chest pain; chest radiography; dyspnea; emergency department; point-of-care ultrasound; radius; rapid assessment of dyspnea in ultrasound; ultrasound.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Study Flow Diagram
Figure 1. Study Flow Diagram
Blue fill color indicates steps required for inclusion, and bold outlines indicate diagnostic endpoints. (ED = Emergency Department, CT = Computed Tomography)

References

    1. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Grenier P, Rouby J-J. . Anesthesiology. 2004;100:9–15.
    1. Diagnosis of pneumothorax by radiography and ultrasonography: a meta-analysis. Ding W, Shen Y, Yang J, He X, Zhang M. Chest. 2011;140:859–866.
    1. Accuracy of lung ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of adult community-acquired pneumonia: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ye X, Xiao H, Chen B, Zhang S. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–9.
    1. Lung ultrasound-implemented diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure in the ED: a SIMEU multicenter study. Pivetta E, Goffi A, Lupia E, et al. Chest. 2015;148:202–210.
    1. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Lichtenstein D, Mézière G. Chest. 2008;134:117–125.
    1. Can chest ultrasonography replace standard chest radiography for evaluation of acute dyspnea in the ED? Zanobetti M, Poggioni C, Pini R. Chest. 2011;139:1140–1147.
    1. The rapid assessment of dyspnea with ultrasound: RADiUS. Manson W, Hafez NM. Ultrasound Clin. 2011;6:261–276.
    1. Symptom-based ultrasonography. Meer J, Beck S, Ali K. Ultrasound Clin. 2014;9:227–246.
    1. Emergency department focused bedside echocardiography in massive pulmonary embolism. Borloz MP, Frohna WJ, Phillips CA, Antonis M. J Emerg Med. 2011;41:658–660.
    1. Bedside lung ultrasound in the assessment of alveolar-interstitial syndrome. Volpicelli G, Mussa A, Garofalo G, et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24:689–696.
    1. Artifacts in ultrasound imaging. Kremkau FW, Taylor KJ. J Ultrasound Med. 1986;5:227–237.
    1. Extension of the thoracic spine sign: a new sonographic marker of pleural effusion. Dickman E, Terentiev V, Likourezos A, Derman A, Haines L. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:1555–1561.
    1. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Lichtenstein D. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20:315–322.
    1. The comet-tail artefact: an ultrasound sign of alveolar-interstitial syndrome. Lichtenstein D, Mézière G, Biderman P, Gepner A, Barré O. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:1640–1646.
    1. The “lung point”: an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Lichtenstein D, Mézière G, Biderman P, Gepner A. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:1434–1440.
    1. Ultrasound detection of lung hepatization. Durant A, Nagdev A. . West J of Emerg Med. 2010;11:322–323.
    1. The R Project for statistical computing. [Aug;2018 ];R Core Team. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2018 :2015.
    1. DTComPair: comparison of binary diagnostic tests in a paired study design. [Aug;2018 ];Stock C. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2014 :2014.
    1. Zhou X, Obuchowski N, McClish D. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine (2nd Edition) Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. Measures of diagnostic accuracy; pp. 13–56.
    1. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. McNemar Q. Psychometrika. 1947;12:153–157.
    1. A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests. Kosinski AS. Stat Med. 2013;32:964–977.
    1. Diagnostic accuracy of sonography for pleural effusion: systematic review. Grimberg A, Shigueoka DC, Atallah AN, Ajzen S, Iared W. Sao Paulo Med J. 2010;128:90–95.
    1. Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema in patients presenting with acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Al Deeb M, Barbic S, Featherstone R, Dankoff J, Barbic D. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:843–852.
    1. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, et al. Resuscitation. 2016;109:33–39.
    1. Chest ultrasounds and X-rays compared in patients with acute dyspnea in an emergency department. Martino I, Statti G, Fancoli F, Tinelli C, Bressan M. Crit Ultrasound J. 2014;6:0.
    1. Drill down analysis of door-to-needle time of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Schrock JW, Lum M. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:1330–1333.
    1. Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST) Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB, et al. J Trauma. 2004;57:288–295.
    1. Integrating eFAST in the initial management of stable trauma patients: the end of plain film radiography. Hamada SR, Delhaye N, Kerever S, Harrois A, Duranteau J. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:62.
    1. Is basic emergency ultrasound training feasible as part of standard undergraduate medical education? Gogalniceanu P, Sheena Y, Kashef E, Purkayastha S, Darzi A, Paraskeva P. J Surg Educ. 2010;67:152–156.
    1. Can medical learners achieve point-of-care ultrasound competency using a high-fidelity ultrasound simulator? A pilot study. Parks AR, Atkinson P, Verheul G, Leblanc-Duchin D. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5:9.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅