The effects of wearing facemasks on oxygenation and ventilation at rest and during physical activity

Steven L Shein, Sofie Whitticar, Kira K Mascho, Elizabeth Pace, Richard Speicher, Kathleen Deakins, Steven L Shein, Sofie Whitticar, Kira K Mascho, Elizabeth Pace, Richard Speicher, Kathleen Deakins

Abstract

Background: Facemasks are recommended to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but concern about inadequate gas exchange is an often cited reason for non-compliance.

Research question: Among adult volunteers, do either cloth masks or surgical masks impair oxygenation or ventilation either at rest or during physical activity?

Study design and methods: With IRB approval and informed consent, we measured heart rate (HR), transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO2) tension and oxygen levels (SpO2) at the conclusion of six 10-minute phases: sitting quietly and walking briskly without a mask, sitting quietly and walking briskly while wearing a cloth mask, and sitting quietly and walking briskly while wearing a surgical mask. Brisk walking required at least a 10bpm increase in heart rate. Occurrences of hypoxemia (decrease in SpO2 of ≥3% from baseline to a value of ≤94%) and hypercarbia (increase in CO2 tension of ≥5 mmHg from baseline to a value of ≥46 mmHg) in individual subjects were collected. Wilcoxon signed-rank was used for pairwise comparisons among values for the whole cohort (e.g. walking without a mask versus walking with a cloth mask).

Results: Among 50 adult volunteers (median age 33 years; 32% with a co-morbidity), there were no episodes of hypoxemia or hypercarbia (0%; 95% confidence interval 0-1.9%). In paired comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in either CO2 or SpO2 between baseline measurements without a mask and those while wearing either kind of mask mask, both at rest and after walking briskly for ten minutes.

Interpretation: The risk of pathologic gas exchange impairment with cloth masks and surgical masks is near-zero in the general adult population.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Measurements taken at rest.
Fig 1. Measurements taken at rest.
Boxes represent the 25th-75th percentile of each variable. The horizontal line in each box represents the median. The whiskers represent the local maximum and local minimum values. Values that are >1.5 times the interquartile range from either end of the box are considered outliers and denoted with a small circle. Paired comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. At rest, all comparisons between baseline/maskless values (black boxes) and facemask values (gray boxes) were not statistically significant (“ns”).
Fig 2. Measurements taken during physical activity.
Fig 2. Measurements taken during physical activity.
Boxes represent the 25th-75th percentile of each variable. The horizontal line in each box represents the median. The whiskers represent the local maximum and local minimum values. Values that are >1.5 times the interquartile range from either end of the box are considered outliers and denoted with a small circle. Paired comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Non-significant differences are denoted “ns” and statistically significant differences are denoted with an asterisk.

References

    1. There have now been over two million virus-related deaths worldwide. New York Times [January 27, 2021]. Available from: .
    1. Group RC, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19—Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2020. Epub 2020/07/18. 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
    1. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19—Preliminary Report. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(10):994 Epub 2020/07/11. 10.1056/NEJMc2022236 .
    1. Goldstein RH, Walensky RP. The Challenges Ahead With Monoclonal Antibodies: From Authorization to Access. JAMA. 2020;324(21):2151–2. Epub 2020/11/12. 10.1001/jama.2020.21872 .
    1. TKaD J When WIll You Be Able to Get a Coronavirus Vaccine? 2020.
    1. Double masking for COVID-19: Why Fauci recommends wearing two masks at once [January 27, 2021]. Available from: .
    1. Gandhi M, Beyrer C, Goosby E. Masks Do More Than Protect Others During COVID-19: Reducing the Inoculum of SARS-CoV-2 to Protect the Wearer. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(10):3063–6. Epub 2020/08/02. 10.1007/s11606-020-06067-8
    1. Lyu W, Wehby GL. Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(8):1419–25. Epub 2020/06/17. 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818 .
    1. Watts S. Why It Feels Like You Can’t Breathe Inside Your Face Mask—and What to Do About It 2020 [October 11, 2020]. Available from: .
    1. Kim JH, Benson SM, Roberge RJ. Pulmonary and heart rate responses to wearing N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(1):24–7. Epub 2012/09/05. 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.037 .
    1. Rebmann T, Carrico R, Wang J. Physiologic and other effects and compliance with long-term respirator use among medical intensive care unit nurses. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(12):1218–23. Epub 2013/06/19. 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.02.017
    1. Chan NC, Li K, Hirsh J. Peripheral Oxygen Saturation in Older Persons Wearing Nonmedical Face Masks in Community Settings. JAMA. 2020. Epub 2020/10/31. 10.1001/jama.2020.21905 .
    1. Roberge RJ, Coca A, Williams WJ, Palmiero AJ, Powell JB. Surgical mask placement over N95 filtering facepiece respirators: physiological effects on healthcare workers. Respirology. 2010;15(3):516–21. Epub 2010/03/27. 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01713.x .
    1. Roberge RJ, Kim JH, Benson SM. Absence of consequential changes in physiological, thermal and subjective responses from wearing a surgical mask. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2012;181(1):29–35. Epub 2012/02/14. 10.1016/j.resp.2012.01.010 .
    1. Samannan R, Holt G, Calderon-Candelario R, Mirsaeidi M, Campos M. Effect of Face Masks on Gas Exchange in Healthy Persons and Patients with COPD. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020. Epub 2020/10/03. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202007-812RL .
    1. Domingo C, Canturri E, Lujan M, Moreno A, Espuelas H, Marin A. [Transcutaneous measurement of partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygen saturation: validation of the SenTec monitor]. Arch Bronconeumol. 2006;42(5):246–51. Epub 2006/06/03. 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60454-0 .

Source: PubMed

3
订阅