Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data

Daniela Michlmayr, Christian Holm Hansen, Sophie Madeleine Gubbels, Palle Valentiner-Branth, Peter Bager, Niels Obel, Birgitte Drewes, Camilla Holten Møller, Frederik Trier Møller, Rebecca Legarth, Kåre Mølbak, Steen Ethelberg, Daniela Michlmayr, Christian Holm Hansen, Sophie Madeleine Gubbels, Palle Valentiner-Branth, Peter Bager, Niels Obel, Birgitte Drewes, Camilla Holten Møller, Frederik Trier Møller, Rebecca Legarth, Kåre Mølbak, Steen Ethelberg

Abstract

Background: The level of protection after a SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection and COVID-19 disease remains important with much of the world still unvaccinated.

Methods: Analysing nationwide, individually referable, Danish register data including RT-PCR-test results, we conducted a cohort study using Cox regression to compare SARS-CoV-2 infection rates before and after a primary infection among still unvaccinated individuals, adjusting for sex, age, comorbidity and residency region. Estimates of protection against infection were calculated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. Estimates of protection against symptomatic infections and infections leading to hospitalisation were also calculated. The prevalence of infections classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic was compared for primary infections and reinfections. The study also assessed protection against each of the main viral variants after a primary infection with an earlier variant by restricting follow-up time to distinct, mutually exclusive periods during which each variant dominated.

Findings: Until 1 July 2021 the estimated protection against reinfection was 83.4% (95%CI: 82.2-84.6%); but lower for the 65+ year-olds (72.2%; 95%CI: 53.2-81.0%). Moderately higher estimates were found for protection against symptomatic disease, 88.3% overall (95%CI: 85.9-90.3%). First-time cases who reported no symptoms were more likely to experience a reinfection (odds ratio: 1.48; 95%CI: 1.35-1.62). By autumn 2021, when infections were almost exclusively caused by the Delta variant, the estimated protection following a recent first infection was 91.3% (95%CI: 89.7-92.7%) compared to 71.4% (95%CI: 66.9-75.3%) after a first infection over a year earlier. With Omicron, a first infection with an earlier variant in the past 3-6 months gave an estimated 51.0% (95%CI: 50.1-52.0%) protection, whereas a first infection longer than 12 months earlier provided only 19.0% (95%CI: 17.2-20.5%) protection. Protection by an earlier variant-infection against hospitalisation due to a new infection was estimated at: 86.6% (95%CI: 46.3-96.7%) for Alpha, 97.2% (95%CI: 89.0-99.3%) for Delta, and 69.8% (95%CI: 51.5-81.2%) for the Omicron variant.

Interpretation: SARS-CoV-2 infection offered a high level of sustained protection against reinfection, comparable with that offered by vaccines, but decreased with the introduction of new main virus variants; dramatically so when Omicron appeared. Protection was lower among the elderly but appeared more pronounced following symptomatic compared to asymptomatic infections. The level of estimated protection against serious disease was somewhat higher than that against infection and possibly longer lasting. Decreases in protection against reinfection, seemed primarily to be driven by viral evolution.

Funding: None.

Keywords: COVID-19; Cohort studies; Epidemic; Herd immunity; Immunity; Reinfection; SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022 The Authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections and weekly test rate over the course of the epidemic in Denmark (A), vaccination coverage by age group in 2021 (B), and the percentage of the main variants, Index (Wuhan), Alpha, Delta and Omicron, circulating in Denmark over the course of the epidemic (C). Vaccine coverage curves (Panel B) were calculated as per the first dose of vaccination given. For the variant analysis (Panel C), four main variant periods were defined: Index: 1 February – 31 December 2020; Alpha: 15 March – 30 June 2021, Delta: 15 July – 15 November 2021, and Omicron: 1 January – 11 March, 2022.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram outlining the two different analyses performed and showing the number of participants in each study cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Natural protection among unvaccinated individuals against infection with Alpha (red dots), Delta (blue rectangles) or Omicron (green triangles) variants after primary infection with an earlier SARS-CoV-2 variant. (B) Natural protection against symptomatic infection for the same three variants of SARS-CoV-2 following a prior infection. The vertical bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

References

    1. Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet. 2022;399(10328):924–944.
    1. Pulliam JRC, van Schalkwyk C, Govender N, et al. Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection associated with emergence of Omicron in South Africa. Science. 2022;376(6593):eabn4947. doi: 10.1126/science.abn4947. Epub 2022 May 6. PMID: 35289632; PMCID: PMC8995029.
    1. Altarawneh HN, Chemaitelly H, Hasan MR, et al. Protection against the Omicron variant from previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(13):1288–1290.
    1. Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Ayoub HH, et al. Relative infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infections, reinfections, and primary infections. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):532.
    1. Abu-Raddad LJ, Bertollini R. Severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections as compared with primary infections. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(26):2487–2488.
    1. Moss P. The T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(2):186–193.
    1. Hansen CH, Michlmayr D, Gubbels SM, Molbak K, Ethelberg S. Assessment of protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 4 million PCR-tested individuals in Denmark in 2020: a population-level observational study. Lancet. 2021;397(10280):1204–1212.
    1. Kojima N, Shrestha NK, Klausner JD. A systematic review of the protective effect of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on repeat infection. Eval Health Prof. 2021;44(4):327–332.
    1. Pilz S, Theiler-Schwetz V, Trummer C, Krause R, Ioannidis JPA. SARS-CoV-2 reinfections: overview of efficacy and duration of natural and hybrid immunity. Environ Res. 2022;209
    1. Kojima N, Klausner JD. Protective immunity after recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;22(1):12–14.
    1. Townsend JP, Hassler HB, Wang Z, et al. The durability of immunity against reinfection by SARS-CoV-2: a comparative evolutionary study. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(12):e666–e675.
    1. Wei J, Matthews PC, Stoesser N, et al. Anti-spike antibody response to natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6250.
    1. Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish civil registration system as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549.
    1. Voldstedlund M, Haarh M, Molbak K. MiBa board of R. the Danish microbiology database (MiBa) 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(1)
    1. Gram MA, Nielsen J, Schelde AB, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death when combining a first dose ChAdOx1 vaccine with a subsequent mRNA vaccine in Denmark: a nationwide population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021;18(12)
    1. Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish national patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490.
    1. Espenhain L, Funk T, Overvad M, et al. Epidemiological characterisation of the first 785 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant cases in Denmark, December 2021. Eurosurveillance. 2021;26(50)
    1. ECDC . 2021. Reinfection-with-SARSCoV2-Implementation-of-a-Surveillance-Case-Definition. ECDC Technical report April 8, 2021.
    1. Lumley SF, O'Donnell D, Stoesser NE, et al. Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(6):533–540.
    1. Hall VJ, Foulkes S, Charlett A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of antibody-positive compared with antibody-negative health-care workers in England: a large, multicentre, prospective cohort study (SIREN) Lancet. 2021;397(10283):1459–1469.
    1. Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Malek JA, et al. Assessment of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in an intense re-exposure setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2020
    1. Sheehan MM, Reddy AJ, Rothberg MB. Reinfection rates among patients who previously tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(10):1882–1886.
    1. Vitale J, Mumoli N, Clerici P, et al. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection 1 year after primary infection in a population in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(10):1407–1408.
    1. Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2021;27(7):1205–1211.
    1. Shenai MB, Rahme R, Noorchashm H. Equivalency of protection from natural immunity in COVID-19 recovered versus fully vaccinated persons: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e19102.
    1. Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, et al. Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1532–1546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119451.
    1. Hansen CH, Schelde AB, Moustsen-Helm IR, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study. Preprint medRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966.
    1. Turner JS, Kim W, Kalaidina E, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans. Nature. 2021;595(7867):421–425.
    1. Lumley SF, Rodger G, Constantinides B, et al. An observational cohort study on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and B.1.1.7 variant infection in healthcare workers by antibody and vaccination status. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(7):1208–1219.
    1. He Z, Ren L, Yang J, et al. Seroprevalence and humoral immune durability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Wuhan, China: a longitudinal, population-level, cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2021;397(10279):1075–1084.
    1. Cervia C, Nilsson J, Zurbuchen Y, et al. Systemic and mucosal antibody responses specific to SARS-CoV-2 during mild versus severe COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(2) 545-57.e9.
    1. Röltgen K, Powell AE, Wirz OF, et al. Defining the features and duration of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with disease severity and outcome. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(54) doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abe0240. PMID: 33288645; PMCID: PMC7857392.
    1. Roeker LE, Knorr DA, Pessin MS, et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34(11):3047–3049.
    1. Cattaneo C, Cancelli V, Imberti L, et al. Production and persistence of specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients with hematologic malignancies: role of rituximab. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(9):151.
    1. Aiello A, Farzaneh F, Candore G, et al. Immunosenescence and its Hallmarks: how to oppose aging strategically? A review of potential options for therapeutic intervention. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2247. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02247. PMID: 31608061; PMCID: PMC6773825.
    1. Xu W, Wong G, Hwang YY, Larbi A. The untwining of immunosenescence and aging. Semin Immunopathol. 2020;42(5):559–572.
    1. Cevik M, Tate M, Lloyd O, Maraolo AE, Schafers J, Ho A. SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(1):e13–e22.
    1. Consortium DC-G. Genomic overview of SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark. 2021. .

Source: PubMed

3
订阅