Tracheal tubes lubricated with water to reduce sore throat after intubation: A randomized non-inferiority trial

Eugene Kim, Seong Mi Yang, Sang Gyu Kwak, Seoyeong Park, Jae-Hyon Bahk, Jeong-Hwa Seo, Eugene Kim, Seong Mi Yang, Sang Gyu Kwak, Seoyeong Park, Jae-Hyon Bahk, Jeong-Hwa Seo

Abstract

Background: Sore throat is common after tracheal intubation. Water can be used to lubricate tracheal tubes, but its benefit has not been validated. We thus did a randomised non-inferiority trial to test the hypothesis that a tube lubricated with water does not reduce sore throat after tracheal intubation.

Methods: We randomized female or male patients (n = 296) undergoing surgery in the ears or eyes to receive either a tube lubricated with water or a tube without lubrication for intubation. We assessed sore throat at 0, 2, 4, and 24 h after surgery; pharyngeal injury at 2 and 24 h after surgery; and respiratory infections within 7 days after surgery. For the incidence of sore throat within 24 h after surgery (primary outcome), the two-sided 90% confidence interval of the risk difference was compared with the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15%. Other outcomes were analyzed with two-sided superiority tests.

Results: The incidence of sore throat within 24 h after surgery was 80/147 (54.4%) in the non-lubricated tube group and 83/149 (55.7%) in the water-lubricated tube group (risk difference -1.3%, 90% confidence interval -10.9% to 8.3%). Because the confidence interval was below the non-inferiority margin, the incidence of sore throat was not higher in the non-lubricated tube group than in the water-lubricated tube group. There was no significant association between groups in the sore throat, pharyngeal injury, and respiratory infection at each assessment time.

Conclusions: The tube lubricated with water did not reduce sore throat and pharyngeal injury after tracheal intubation compared to the tube without lubrication.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram.
At seven days after surgery, patients were asked by phone call whether they had respiratory infection since the surgery.
Fig 2. The risk difference (square) with…
Fig 2. The risk difference (square) with 90% confidence interval (bar) for the incidence of sore throat within 24 h after surgery.
The upper limit of the confidence interval is less than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. This means that the incidence of sore throat is not higher in the non-lubricated tube group than in the water-lubricated tube group.
Fig 3. The incidence and severity of…
Fig 3. The incidence and severity of sore throat at 0, 2, 4, and 24 h after surgery in the water-lubricated and non-lubricated tube groups.
P values are 0.851, 0.922, 0.741, and 0.957 at 0, 2, 4, and 24 h after surgery, respectively, by chi-squared tests.
Fig 4. The site and type of…
Fig 4. The site and type of pharyngeal injury at 2 (A) and 24 h (B) after surgery in the water-lubricated and non-lubricated tube groups.
At 2 h after surgery (A), P values are 0.059, 0.565, 0.467, 0.634, and 0.979 in the uvula, pharyngeal wall, tonsillar pillar, tonsillar fossa, and vallecula, respectively, by chi-squared tests. At 24 h after surgery (B), P values are 0.083, 0.769, 0.962, 0.645, and 0.4000 in the same order as the fig A.

References

    1. Conway CM, Miller JS, Sugden FL. Sore throat after anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1960; 32: 219–223.
    1. Loeser EA, Kaminsky A, Diaz A, Stanley TH, Pace NL. The influence of endotracheal tube cuff design and cuff lubrication on postoperative sore throat. Anesthesiology. 1983; 58: 376–379.
    1. Harding CJ, McVey FK. Interview method affects incidence of postoperative sore throat. Anaesthesia. 1987; 42: 1104–1107.
    1. Christensen AM, Willemoes-Larsen H, Lundby L, Jakobsen KB. Postoperative throat complaints after tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1994; 73: 786–787.
    1. Ayoub CM, Ghobashy A, Koch ME, McGrimley L, Pascale V, Qadir S, et al. Widespread application of topical steroids to decrease sore throat, hoarseness, and cough after tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 1998; 87: 714–716.
    1. McHardy FE, Chung F. Postoperative sore throat: cause, prevention and treatment. Anaesthesia. 1999; 54: 444–53.
    1. Ozaki M, Minami K, Sata T, Shigematsu A. Transdermal ketoprofen mitigates the severity of postoperative sore throat. Can J Anaesth. 2001; 48: 1080–1083.
    1. Higgins PP, Chung F, Mezei G. Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 88: 582–584.
    1. Soltani HA, Aghadavoudi O. The effect of different lidocaine application methods on postoperative cough and sore throat. J Clin Anesth. 2002; 14: 15–18.
    1. Estebe JP, Delahaye S, Le Corre P, Dollo G, Le Naoures A, Chevanne F, et al. Alkalinization of intra-cuff lidocaine and use of gel lubrication protect against tracheal tube-induced emergence phenomena. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 92: 361–366. 10.1093/bja/aeh078
    1. Maruyama K, Sakai H, Miyazawa H, Toda N, Iinuma Y, Mochizuki N, et al. Sore throat and hoarseness after total intravenous anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 92: 541–543. 10.1093/bja/aeh098
    1. Agarwal A, Nath SS, Goswami D, Gupta D, Dhiraaj S, Singh PK. An evaluation of the efficacy of aspirin and benzydamine hydrochloride gargle for attenuating postoperative sore throat: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2006; 103: 1001–1003. 10.1213/01.ane.0000231637.28427.00
    1. Thomas S, Beevi S. Dexamethasone reduces the severity of postoperative sore throat. Can J Anaesth. 2007; 54: 897–891. 10.1007/BF03026793
    1. Sumathi PA, Shenoy T, Ambareesha M, Krishna HM. Controlled comparison between betamethasone gel and lidocaine jelly applied over tracheal tube to reduce postoperative sore throat, cough, and hoarseness of voice. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 100: 215–218. 10.1093/bja/aem341
    1. Canbay O, Celebi N, Sahin A, Celiker V, Ozgen S, Aypar U. Ketamine gargle for attenuating postoperative sore throat. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 100: 490–493. 10.1093/bja/aen023
    1. Park SH, Han SH, Do SH, Kim JW, Rhee KY, Kim JH. Prophylactic dexamethasone decreases the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness after tracheal extubation with a double-lumen endobronchial tube. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107: 1814–1818. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318185d093
    1. Huang YS, Hung NK, Lee MS, Kuo CP, Yu JC, Huang GS, et al. The effectiveness of benzydamine hydrochloride spraying on the endotracheal tube cuff or oral mucosa for postoperative sore throat. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111: 887–891. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e6d82a
    1. Hung NK, Wu CT, Chan SM, Lu CH, Huang YS, Yeh CC, et al. Effect on postoperative sore throat of spraying the endotracheal tube cuff with benzydamine hydrochloride, 10% lidocaine, and 2% lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111: 882–886. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d4854e
    1. Borazan H, Kececioglu A, Okesli S, Otelcioglu S. Oral magnesium lozenge reduces postoperative sore throat: a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117: 512–518. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182639d5f
    1. Seo JH, Kwon TK, Jeon Y, Hong DM, Kim HJ, Bahk JH. Comparison of techniques for double-lumen endobronchial intubation: 90 degrees or 180 degrees rotation during advancement through the glottis. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111: 812–817. 10.1093/bja/aet203
    1. Seo JH, Cho CW, Hong DM, Jeon Y, Bahk JH. The effects of thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes on postoperative sore throat, hoarseness and vocal cord injuries: a prospective double-blind randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016; 116: 282–288. 10.1093/bja/aev414
    1. Briscoe WH, Titmuss S, Tiberg F, Thomas RK, McGillivray DJ, Klein J. Boundary lubrication under water. Nature. 2006; 444: 191–194. 10.1038/nature05196
    1. Pothier DD, Raghava N, Monteiro P, Awad Z. A randomized controlled trial: is water better than a standard lubricant in nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006; 31: 134–7. 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01173.x
    1. Panman MR, Bakker BH, den Uyl D, Kay ER, Leigh DA, Buma WJ, et al. Water lubricates hydrogen-bonded molecular machines. Nat Chem. 2013; 5: 929–934. 10.1038/nchem.1744
    1. Kim HJ, Kim DE. Water Lubrication of Stainless Steel using Reduced Graphene Oxide Coating. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 17034 10.1038/srep17034
    1. Kim E, Yang SM, Yoon SJ, Bahk JH, Seo JH. The effects of water lubrication of tracheal tubes on post-intubation airway complications: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016; 17: 562 10.1186/s13063-016-1699-0
    1. Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112: 498–505. 10.1093/bja/aet377
    1. Domino KB, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Airway injury during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91: 1703–1711.
    1. Yamanaka H, Hayashi Y, Watanabe Y, Uematu H, Mashimo T. Prolonged hoarseness and arytenoid cartilage dislocation after tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103: 452–455. 10.1093/bja/aep169
    1. Komasawa N, Komatsu M, Yamasaki H, Minami T. Lip, tooth, and pharyngeal injuries during tracheal intubation at a teaching hospital. Br J Anaesth. 2017; 119: 171 10.1093/bja/aex184
    1. Kundra P, Kumar V, Srinivasan K, Gopalakrishnan S, Krishnappa S. Laryngoscopic techniques to assess vocal cord mobility following thyroid surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2010; 80: 817–821. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05441.x
    1. Sunkaraneni VS, Jones SE. Topical anaesthetic or vasoconstrictor preparations for flexible fibre-optic nasal pharyngoscopy and laryngoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011: Cd005606.
    1. Seccia V, Dallan I, Massimetti G, Segnini G, Navari E, Fortunato S, et al. Patient-related and ENT-related predictive factors based on the pain experienced during flexible nasendoscopy. Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 1648–1652. 10.1002/lary.24535
    1. Casati A, Casaletti E. Sore throat and pharyngeal trauma after extratracheal airway placement: does the literature help practitioners? Anesth Analg. 1999; 89: 263
    1. Bottcher A, Mencke T, Zitzmann A, Knecht R, Jowett N, Nöldge-Schomburg G, et al. Laryngeal injuries following endotracheal intubation in ENT surgery: predictive value of anatomical scores. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 271: 345–352. 10.1007/s00405-013-2659-x
    1. Feldman C, Kassel M, Cantrell J, Kaka S, Morar R, Goolam Mahomed A, et al. The presence and sequence of endotracheal tube colonization in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 1999; 13: 546–551.
    1. Pneumatikos IA, Dragoumanis CK, Bouros DE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 2009; 110: 673–680. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819868e0
    1. Gibbs K, Holzman IR. Endotracheal tube: friend or foe? Bacteria, the endotracheal tube, and the impact of colonization and infection. Semin Perinatol. 2012; 36: 454–461. 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.06.008
    1. Sottile FD, Marrie TJ, Prough DS, Hobgood CD, Gower DJ, Webb LX, et al. Nosocomial pulmonary infection: possible etiologic significance of bacterial adhesion to endotracheal tubes. Crit Care Med. 1986; 14: 265–270.
    1. Cairns S, Thomas JG, Hooper SJ, Wise MP, Frost PJ, Wilson MJ, et al. Molecular analysis of microbial communities in endotracheal tube biofilms. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e14759 10.1371/journal.pone.0014759
    1. Puyo CA, Peruzzi D, Earhart A, Roller E, Karanikolas M, Kollef MH, et al. Endotracheal tube-induced sore throat pain and inflammation is coupled to the release of mitochondrial DNA. Mol Pain. 2017; 13: 1–10.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅