Natural language indicators of differential gene regulation in the human immune system

Matthias R Mehl, Charles L Raison, Thaddeus W W Pace, Jesusa M G Arevalo, Steve W Cole, Matthias R Mehl, Charles L Raison, Thaddeus W W Pace, Jesusa M G Arevalo, Steve W Cole

Abstract

Adverse social conditions have been linked to a conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) in circulating leukocytes that may contribute to social gradients in disease. However, the CNS mechanisms involved remain obscure, in part because CTRA gene-expression profiles often track external social-environmental variables more closely than they do self-reported internal affective states such as stress, depression, or anxiety. This study examined the possibility that variations in patterns of natural language use might provide more sensitive indicators of the automatic threat-detection and -response systems that proximally regulate autonomic induction of the CTRA. In 22,627 audio samples of natural speech sampled from the daily interactions of 143 healthy adults, both total language output and patterns of function-word use covaried with CTRA gene expression. These language features predicted CTRA gene expression substantially better than did conventional self-report measures of stress, depression, and anxiety and did so independently of demographic and behavioral factors (age, sex, race, smoking, body mass index) and leukocyte subset distributions. This predictive relationship held when language and gene expression were sampled more than a week apart, suggesting that associations reflect stable individual differences or chronic life circumstances. Given the observed relationship between personal expression and gene expression, patterns of natural language use may provide a useful behavioral indicator of nonconsciously evaluated well-being (implicit safety vs. threat) that is distinct from conscious affective experience and more closely tracks the neurobiological processes involved in peripheral gene regulation.

Keywords: genomics; psycholinguistics; psychoneuroimmunology.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Natural language-use features. Distribution of individual differences in (A) EAR-sampled parameters of language volume and (B) language structure, including eight general categories of function word (capitalized labels) and five subcategories of personal pronoun (lowercase labels). Data represent average values for each parameter computed over a mean of 158 (range 14–260) 30- to 50-s audio samples collected at 9- to 12.5-min intervals over 2 d (resulting in an average of 4,070 ± 272 words per individual). Whiskers indicate the range of individual values across 143 study participants; boxes span 25th–75th percentiles, and internal bars indicate 50th percentile.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Prediction of CTRA gene expression. (A) Prediction of peripheral blood mRNA levels for 50 CTRA indicator transcripts (proinflammatory genes, IFN response genes, and antibody-related transcripts) by demographic and behavioral characteristics (blue chords), language-volume metavariables (orange chords), and language-structure features representing the prevalence of eight categories of function word (dark green chords) and five subcategories of personal pronoun (light green chords). Black arcs indicate total CTRA prediction in each mixed-effect linear model. Chord widths indicate the relative contribution from standardized values of each variable (squared partial regression coefficients, sorted top-to-bottom by descending magnitude in Dataset S2 model 3). Colored chords indicate statistically significant effects (P < 0.05), and gray chords indicate nonsignificant effects. (B) Increment to CTRA prediction from adding self-report measures of depression, anxiety, perceived stress, and perceived social isolation/loneliness (red chords); Dataset S2 model 4. (C) Increment to prediction from adding mRNA markers of leukocyte subsets in the peripheral blood cell pool (purple chords); Dataset S2 model 5.

References

    1. Cole SW. Social regulation of human gene expression: Mechanisms and implications for public health. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(Suppl 1):S84–S92.
    1. Cole SW. Human social genomics. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004601.
    1. Powell ND, et al. Social stress up-regulates inflammatory gene expression in the leukocyte transcriptome via β-adrenergic induction of myelopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:16574–16579.
    1. Heidt T, et al. Chronic variable stress activates hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 2014;20:754–758.
    1. Beissner F, Meissner K, Bär KJ, Napadow V. The autonomic brain: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function. J Neurosci. 2013;33:10503–10511.
    1. Le Doux J. Anxious: Using the Brain to Understand and Treat Fear and Anxiety. Viking; New York: 2015.
    1. Knight JM, et al. Low socioeconomic status, adverse gene expression profiles, and clinical outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:69–78.
    1. Kitayama S, Akutsu S, Uchida Y, Cole SW. Work, meaning, and gene regulation: Findings from a Japanese information technology firm. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;72:175–181.
    1. Cole SW, et al. Myeloid differentiation architecture of leukocyte transcriptome dynamics in perceived social isolation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:15142–15147.
    1. Cole SW, et al. Loneliness, eudaimonia, and the human conserved transcriptional response to adversity. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;62:11–17.
    1. Miller GE, et al. Greater inflammatory activity and blunted glucocorticoid signaling in monocytes of chronically stressed caregivers. Brain Behav Immun. 2014;41:191–199.
    1. Antoni MH, et al. Cognitive-behavioral stress management reverses anxiety-related leukocyte transcriptional dynamics. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:366–372.
    1. Creswell JD, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction training reduces loneliness and pro-inflammatory gene expression in older adults: A small randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26:1095–1101.
    1. Newman ML, Pennebaker JW, Berry DS, Richards JM. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29:665–675.
    1. Hancock JT, Curry LE, Goorha S, Woodworth M. On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Process. 2008;41:1–23.
    1. Skillicorn DB, Little A. Patterns of word use for deception in testimony. In: Yang CC, Chau M, Wang JH, Chen H, editors. Security Informatics. Springer; New York: 2010.
    1. Pennebaker JW. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. Bloomsbury; New York: 2011.
    1. Cohn MA, Mehl MR, Pennebaker JW. Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychol Sci. 2004;15:687–693.
    1. Kacewicz E, Pennebaker JW, Davis M, Jeon M, Graesser AC. Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. J Lang Soc Psychol. 2013;33:125–143.
    1. Pennebaker JW, Lay TC. Language use and personality during crises: Analyses of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s press conferences. J Res Pers. 2002;36:271–282.
    1. Bock JK. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formation. Psychol Rev. 1982;89:1–47.
    1. Hickok G. Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:135–145.
    1. Mehl MR, Pennebaker JW, Crow DM, Dabbs J, Price JH. The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001;33:517–523.
    1. Mehl MR, Robbins ML, Deters FG. Naturalistic observation of health-relevant social processes: The electronically activated recorder methodology in psychosomatics. Psychosom Med. 2012;74:410–417.
    1. Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME. 2007 Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC (2007) (Austin, TX). Available at . Accessed October 18, 2017.
    1. Kutner M, Nachtsheim C, Neter J, Li W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 5th Ed McGraw-Hill/Irwin; New York: 2005.
    1. Fredrickson BL, et al. A functional genomic perspective on human well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:13684–13689.
    1. Fredrickson BL, et al. Psychological well-being and the human conserved transcriptional response to adversity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121839.
    1. Cole SW, Hawkley LC, Arevalo JM, Cacioppo JT. Transcript origin analysis identifies antigen-presenting cells as primary targets of socially regulated gene expression in leukocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:3080–3085.
    1. Kagan J. Galen’s Prophecy: Temperament in Human Nature. Basic Books; New York: 1994.
    1. Pennebaker JW. Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychol Sci. 1997;8:162–166.
    1. Gross JJ. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. 2nd Ed Guilford; New York: 2013.
    1. Pennebaker JW, Chew CH. Behavioral inhibition and electrodermal activity during deception. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;49:1427–1433.
    1. Gross JJ, Levenson RW. Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106:95–103.
    1. Gross JJ, Levenson RW. Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64:970–986.
    1. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology. 2002;39:281–291.
    1. Cole SW, et al. Social regulation of gene expression in human leukocytes. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R189.
    1. Eisenberger NI, Cole SW. Social neuroscience and health: Neurophysiological mechanisms linking social ties with physical health. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:669–674.
    1. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: When the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:46–56.
    1. Eisenberger NI, Inagaki TK, Mashal NM, Irwin MR. Inflammation and social experience: An inflammatory challenge induces feelings of social disconnection in addition to depressed mood. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:558–563.
    1. Inagaki TK, Muscatell KA, Irwin MR, Cole SW, Eisenberger NI. Inflammation selectively enhances amygdala activity to socially threatening images. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3222–3226.
    1. Mehl MR, Vazire S, Holleran SE, Clark CS. Eavesdropping on happiness: Well-being is related to having less small talk and more substantive conversations. Psychol Sci. 2010;21:539–541.
    1. Schwartz HA, et al. Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73791.
    1. Iliev R, Dehghani M, Sagi E. Automated text analysis in psychology: Methods, applications, and future developments. Lang Cogn. 2015;7:265–290.
    1. Cao J, Zhang S. Multiple comparison procedures. JAMA. 2014;312:543–544.
    1. Cohen S, Kessler RC, Underwood Gordon L. Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. Oxford Univ Press; New York: 1995. Perceived stress scale.
    1. Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. Beck Depression Inventory. 2nd Ed Psychological Corporation; San Antonio: 1996.
    1. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893–897.
    1. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:472–480.
    1. McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JM. Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2008.
    1. Desbordes G, et al. Effects of mindful-attention and compassion meditation training on amygdala response to emotional stimuli in an ordinary, non-meditative state. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:292.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, VA) Ed 4.
    1. Illumina Inc 2011 Imputing Human HT-12 Expression BeadChip Data. Technical Note: Systems and Software. Available at . Accessed October 17, 2017.
    1. Krzywinski M, et al. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–1645.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅