Effects of a nutritional intervention program based on the self-determination theory and promoting the Mediterranean diet

Vicky Leblanc, Catherine Bégin, Anne-Marie Hudon, Marie-Michelle Royer, Louise Corneau, Sylvie Dodin, Simone Lemieux, Vicky Leblanc, Catherine Bégin, Anne-Marie Hudon, Marie-Michelle Royer, Louise Corneau, Sylvie Dodin, Simone Lemieux

Abstract

Our objective was to determine gender differences in the impact of a nutritional intervention based on the self-determination theory and promoting the Mediterranean diet on changes in eating-related self-determined motivation and adherence to the Mediterranean diet. Changes in eating-related self-determined motivation were larger in men than in women in response to the intervention and at follow-up, but the magnitude of change decreased with time in both genders. Changes in eating-related self-determined motivation were positively associated with changes in the Mediterranean diet adherence in response to the intervention and at follow-up in men only, suggesting that the nutritional program seems to fit better men than women.

Keywords: eating; eating behavior; education; gender; health promotion; theory.

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Continuum of the self-determined motivation. Source: adapted from Ryan and Deci (2000).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Description of the 12-week nutritional intervention program and measurements performed at baseline (t = 0), after the end of the intervention (t = 3 months), and then at 3-month and 6-month after the end of the intervention (t = 6 months and t = 9 months, respectively).

References

    1. Arganini CSA, Comitato R, Virgili F, et al. (2012) Gender differences in food choice and dietary intake in modern western societies. In: Maddock J. (ed.) Public Health—Social and Behavioral Health. Available at:
    1. Bemelmans WJ, Broer J, de Vries JH, et al. (2000) Impact of Mediterranean diet education versus posted leaflet on dietary habits and serum cholesterol in a high risk population for cardiovascular disease. Public Health Nutrition 3: 273–283.
    1. Beunckens C, Molenberghs G, Kenward MG. (2005) Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials. Clinical Trials 2: 379–386.
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research—Institute of Gender and Health (2012) What a difference sex and gender make? Canada. Available at:
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
    1. Deci EL, Eghrari H, Patrick BC, et al. (1994) Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality 62: 119–142.
    1. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvado J, et al. (2013) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet. New England Journal of Medicine 368: 1279–1290.
    1. Goulet J, Lamarche B, Nadeau G, et al. (2003) Effect of a nutritional intervention promoting the Mediterranean food pattern on plasma lipids, lipoproteins and body weight in healthy French-Canadian women. Atherosclerosis 170: 115–124.
    1. Goulet J, Nadeau G, Lapointe A, et al. (2004) Validity and reproducibility of an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire for healthy French-Canadian men and women. Nutrition Journal 3: 13.
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. (2004) Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 44: 720–732.
    1. International Diabetes Federation (2006) IDF worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. Available at: (accessed July 2013).
    1. Kinnafick FE, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Duda JL. (2014) Physical activity adoption to adherence, lapse, and dropout: A self-determination theory perspective. Qualitative Health Research 24: 706–718.
    1. Landgren BM, Collins A, Csemiczky G, et al. (2004) Menopause transition: Annual changes in serum hormonal patterns over the menstrual cycle in women during a nine-year period prior to menopause. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 89: 2763–2769.
    1. Leblanc V, Begin C, Corneau L, et al. (2015a) Gender differences in dietary intakes: What is the contribution of motivational variables? Journal of Human Nutrition Dietetics 28: 37–46.
    1. Leblanc V, Begin C, Hudon AM, et al. (2014) Gender differences in the long-term effects of a nutritional intervention program promoting the Mediterranean diet: Changes in dietary intakes, eating behaviors, anthropometric and metabolic variables. Nutrition Journal 13: 107.
    1. Leblanc V, Hudon AM, Royer MM, et al. (2015b) Differences between men and women in dietary intakes and metabolic profile in response to a 12-week nutritional intervention promoting the Mediterranean diet. Journal of Nutritional Science 4: e13.
    1. Lohman T, Roche A, Artorel R. (1988) The Airlie (VA) Consensus Conference: Standardization of Anthropometric Measurements. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
    1. Mask L, Blanchard CM. (2011) The protective role of general self-determination against “thin ideal” media exposure on women’s body image and eating-related concerns. Journal of Health Psychology 16: 489–499.
    1. NCEP ATP., III (2002) Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 106: 3143–3421.
    1. Patrick H, Williams GC. (2012) Self-determination theory: Its application to health behavior and complementarity with motivational interviewing. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Act 9: 18.
    1. Pelletier LG, Dion SC, Slovinec-D’Angel M, et al. (2004) Why do you regulate what you eat? Relationships between forms of regulation, eating behaviors, sustained dietary behavior change, and psychological adjustment. Motivation and Emotion 28: 245–277.
    1. Povey R, Wellens B, Conner M. (2001) Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite 37: 15–26.
    1. Resnicow K, McMaster F. (2012) Motivational interviewing: Moving from why to how with autonomy support. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Act 9: 19.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68–78.
    1. Silva MN, Markland D, Minderico CS, et al. (2008) A randomized controlled trial to evaluate self-determination theory for exercise adherence and weight control: Rationale and intervention description. BMC Public Health 8: 234.
    1. Sofi F, Macchi C, Abbate R, et al. (2013) Mediterranean diet and health status: An updated meta-analysis and a proposal for a literature-based adherence score. Public Health Nutrition 17: 1–14.
    1. Sparks P, Conner M, James R, et al. (2001) Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: An exploration in the domain of food choice. British Journal of Health Psychology 6: 53–68.
    1. Vallerand RJ. (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: Zanna MP. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 271–360.
    1. Vansteenkiste M, Sheldon KM. (2006) There’s nothing more practical than a good theory: Integrating motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 45: 63–82.
    1. Verstuyf J, Patrick H, Vansteenkiste M, et al. (2012) Motivational dynamics of eating regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Act 9: 21.
    1. Wang WC, Worsley A. (2014) Healthy eating norms and food consumption. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 68: 592–601.
    1. Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, et al. (2004) Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 27: 107–116.
    1. Williams GC, Deci EL. (2001) Activating patients for smoking cessation through physician autonomy support. Medical Care 39: 813–823.
    1. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Sharp D, et al. (2006) Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: Supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychology 25: 91–101.
    1. Williams GC, Minicucci DS, Kouides RW, et al. (2002) Self-determination, smoking, diet and health. Health Education Research 17: 512–521.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅