Endoscopic ultrasound in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: impact on clinical decision-making

David M de Jong, Sanne van de Vondervoort, Roy S Dwarkasing, Michael Doukas, Rogier P Voermans, Robert C Verdonk, Wojciech G Polak, Jeroen de Jonge, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Marco J Bruno, Lydi M J W van Driel, David M de Jong, Sanne van de Vondervoort, Roy S Dwarkasing, Michael Doukas, Rogier P Voermans, Robert C Verdonk, Wojciech G Polak, Jeroen de Jonge, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Marco J Bruno, Lydi M J W van Driel

Abstract

Background and study aims Accurate assessment of the lymph node (LN) status is crucial in resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) to prevent major surgery in patients with extraregional metastatic LNs (MLNs). This study investigates the added value of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with or without tissue acquisition (TA) for the detection of MLNs in patients with resectable pCCA. Patients and methods In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, patients with potentially resectable pCCA who underwent EUS preoperatively between 2010-2020, were included. The clinical impact of EUS-TA was defined as the percentage of patients who did not undergo surgical resection due to MLNs found with EUS-TA. Findings of cross-sectional imaging were compared with EUS-TA findings and surgery. Results EUS was performed on 141 patients, of whom 107 (76 %) had suspicious LNs on cross-sectional imaging. Surgical exploration was prevented in 20 patients (14 %) because EUS-TA detected MLNs, of which 17 (85 %) were extraregional. Finally, 74 patients (52 %) underwent surgical exploration followed by complete resection in 40 (28 %). MLNs were identified at definitive pathology in 24 (33 %) patients, of which 9 (38 %) were extraregional and 15 (63 %) regional. Conclusions EUS-TA may be of value in patients with potentially resectable pCCA based on preoperative cross-sectional imaging, regardless of lymphadenopathy at cross-sectional imaging. A prospective study in which a comprehensive EUS investigation with LN assessment and EUS-TA of LNs is performed routinely should confirm this promise.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests Dr. Bruno received research funding for industry-initiated studies from Boston Scientific and Cook Medical. He received research funding for investigator initiated studies from Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Pentax Medical, Interscope, Mylan and ChiRoStim. He is a consultant to Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, and Pentax Medical. Dr. Voermans received research funding for investigator initiated studies from Boston Scientific and Prion Medical. He is a consultant with speakers fee for Boston Scientific.

The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of patients included in this study. § In 72 patients, because of missing pathology in one patient and one patient with cardiac arrest during surgery, before any resection. Two patients had preoperative confirmation of MLN by EUS-TA and underwent surgery. The first patient underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy which showed locally advanced disease. The second patient underwent left hemi-hepatectomy with regional MLN. These patients are not taken into account.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of patients included in this study, according to imaging findings. § For patients without preoperative confirmation of MLN by EUS-TA.

References

    1. Blechacz B, Komuta M, Roskams T et al.Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:512–522.
    1. Blechacz B. Cholangiocarcinoma: Current knowledge and new developments. Gut Liver. 2017;11:13–26.
    1. Radtke A, Konigsrainer A. Surgical therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Visc Med. 2016;32:422–426.
    1. Khan S A, Davidson B R, Goldin R D et al.Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012;61:1657–1669.
    1. Banales J M, Cardinale V, Carpino G et al.Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:261–280.
    1. Cillo U, Fondevila C, Donadon M et al.Surgery for cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int. 2019;39:143–155.
    1. Amin M B, Gress D M, Meyer Vega LR . New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition; pp. 295–301.
    1. Edge S B, Compton C C, Fritz A G . New York: Springer International Publishing; 2010. Trotti. American joint committee on cancer: Cancer staging manual, 7 ed; pp. 201–234.
    1. Gaspersz M P, Buettner S, van Vugt J LA et al.Evaluation of the new american joint committee on cancer staging manual 8th edition for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:1612–1618.
    1. Cai Y, Cheng N, Ye H et al.The current management of cholangiocarcinoma: A comparison of current guidelines. Biosci Trends. 2016;10:92–102.
    1. [Anonymous]. Galweg- en galblaascarcinoom, landelijke richtlijn [Internet]. Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland; c2003–2013Available from (Accessed June 1 2022)
    1. Ruys A T, van Beem B E, Engelbrecht M R et al.Radiological staging in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:1255–1262.
    1. Hanninen E L, Pech M, Jonas S et al.Magnetic resonance imaging including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for tumor localization and therapy planning in malignant hilar obstructions. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:462–470.
    1. Malikowski T, Levy M J, Gleeson F C et al.Endoscopic ultrasound/fine needle aspiration is effective for lymph node staging in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2020;72:940–948.
    1. Gleeson F C, Rajan E, Levy M J et al.EUS-guided FNA of regional lymph nodes in patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:438–443.
    1. Mohamadnejad M, DeWitt J M, Sherman S et al.Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:71–78.
    1. Liang L, Li C, Jia H D et al.Prognostic factors of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;14 doi: 10.1177/2631774521993065.
    1. Furukawa H, Ikuma H, Asakura-Yokoe K et al.Preoperative staging of biliary carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: prospective comparison with PET+CT, MDCT and histopathology. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2841–284719.
    1. Loch F N, Asbach P, Haas M et al.Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18:213.
    1. Zhuang Z, Zhang Y, Wei M et al.Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the accuracy of various lymph node staging criteria in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontier Oncology. 2021;11 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.709070.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅