National trends in lumbar spine decompression and fusion surgery in Finland, 1997-2018

Ville T Ponkilainen, Tuomas T Huttunen, Marko H Neva, Liisa Pekkanen, Jussi P Repo, Ville M Mattila, Ville T Ponkilainen, Tuomas T Huttunen, Marko H Neva, Liisa Pekkanen, Jussi P Repo, Ville M Mattila

Abstract

Background and purpose - During recent years, spine surgery techniques have advanced, the population has become older, and multiple high-quality randomized controlled trials that support surgical treatment for degenerative spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis have been published. We assess the incidence and trends in spine fusion and decompression surgery in Finland between 1997 and 2018.Patients and methods - We used nationwide data from the Finnish nationwide National Hospital Discharge Register. The study population covered all patients aged 20 years or over in Finland (5.5 million inhabitants) during a 22-year period from 1997 through 2018. All patients who underwent spinal decompression were included. Patients with both decompression and fusion codes were analyzed as fusions.Results - 76,673 lumbar spine decompressions and fusions were performed during the study period. The incidence of lumbar spine decompressions increased from 33 (95% CI 23-45) per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 77 (CI 61-95) per 100,000 person-years in 2018. The incidence of lumbar spine fusions increased from 9 (CI 5-17) per 100,000 person-years in 1997 to 30 (CI 21-43) per 100,000 person-years in 2018. The increase in incidence of lumbar spinal fusions was highest among women aged over 75 years, with a 4-fold increase.Interpretation - The incidence of lumbar spine fusions and decompressions increased between 1997 and 2018 in Finland. These findings may be the result of the emergence of advanced surgical techniques but may also be the result of an aging population and increased evidence supporting the surgical treatment of various spinal pathologies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Incidence of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations in Finland between 1997 and 2018.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations by gender and age group in Finland between 1997 and 2018.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations by gender and age group in Finland between 1997 and 2018.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations by gender and age group in Finland between 1997 and 2018.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations by gender and age group in Finland between 1997 and 2018.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations by gender and age group in Finland between 1997 and 2018.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations by gender and age group in Finland between 1997 and 2018.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative reoperation rate of lumbar spine decompression and fusion operations in Finland between 1997 and 2018.

References

    1. Bulcke J, Termote J-L, Palmers Y, Crolla D. Computed tomography of the human skeletal muscular system. Neuroradiology 1979; 17(3): 127–36.
    1. Deyo R A. Back surgery—who needs it. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(22): 2239–43.
    1. Deyo R A, Gray D T, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin B I. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30(12): 1441–5.
    1. Ekman P, Möller H, Shalabi A, Yu Y X, Hedlund R. A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 2009; 18(8): 1175–86.
    1. Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374(15): 1413–23.
    1. Gray D T, Deyo R A, Kreuter W, Mirza S K, Heagerty P J, Comstock B A, Chan L. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31(17): 1957–63.
    1. Irmola T M, Häkkinen A, Järvenpää S, Marttinen I, Vihtonen K, Neva M. Reoperation rates following instrumented lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43(4): 295–301.
    1. Kalichman L, Hodges P, Li L, Guermazi A, Hunter D J. Changes in paraspinal muscles and their association with low back pain and spinal degeneration: CT study. Eur Spine J 2010; 19(7): 1136–44.
    1. Keskimaki I. Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish hospital register. Int J Health Sci 1991; 2:15–21.
    1. Kim C W, Siemionow K, Anderson D G, Phillips F M. The current state of minimally invasive spine surgery. Instr Course Lect 2011; 60: 353–70.
    1. Lurie J D, Tosteson T D, Tosteson A, Abdu W A, Zhao W, Morgan T S, Weinstein J N. Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40(2): 63.
    1. Lønne G, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Nordvall D, Gerdhem P, Lagerbäck T, Andersen M, Eiskjaer S, Gehrchen M, Jacobs W. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries. Spine J 2019; 19(1): 41–9.
    1. Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis?: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32(1): 1–8.
    1. Mattila V M, Sillanpaa P, Iivonen T, Parkkari J, Kannus P, Pihlajamaki H. Coverage and accuracy of diagnosis of cruciate ligament injury in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register. Injury 2008; 39(12): 1373–6.
    1. Passias P G, Jalai C M, Worley N, Vira S, Marascalchi B, McClelland S III, Lafage V, Errico T J. Adult spinal deformity: national trends in the presentation, treatment, and perioperative outcomes from 2003 to 2010. Spine Deform 2017; 5(5): 342–50.
    1. Patil P G, Turner D A, Pietrobon R. National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990–2000. Neurosurgery 2005; 57(4): 753–8.
    1. Seitsalo S. Back surgery rates in Finland 1987–1994: Increasing trends; regional variations. Fin J Orthop Traumatol 1996; 19:199–204.
    1. Slätis P, Malmivaara A, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Herno A, Kankare J, Seitsalo S, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P. Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2011; 20(7): 1174–81.
    1. Sund R. Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: a systematic review. Scand J Public Health 2012; 40(6): 505–15.
    1. Taylor V M, Deyo R A, Cherkin D C, Kreuter W. Low back pain hospitalization: recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19(11): 1207–12; discussion 13.
    1. Weinstein J N, Lurie J D, Tosteson T D, Hanscom B, Tosteson A N, Blood E A, Birkmeyer N J, Hilibrand A S, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F P. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(22): 2257–70.
    1. Weinstein J N, Tosteson T D, Lurie J D, Tosteson A N, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden S D. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(8): 794–810.
    1. Weinstein J N, Lurie J D, Tosteson T D, Zhao W, Blood E A, Tosteson A N, Birkmeyer N, Herkowitz H, Longley M, Lenke L. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(6): 1295.
    1. Weinstein J N, Tosteson T D, Lurie J D, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden S D, Hilibrand A. Surgical versus non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35(14): 1329.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅