Feasibility of delivering a virtual 1-day acceptance and commitment therapy workshop to rural veterans through community partnerships

Lilian Dindo, Angelic Chaison, Merlyn Rodrigues, Ken Woods, Alicia Mark, Derrecka Boykin, Lilian Dindo, Angelic Chaison, Merlyn Rodrigues, Ken Woods, Alicia Mark, Derrecka Boykin

Abstract

Background: This single-arm, open pilot study examined the feasibility and initial efficacy of a 1-day virtual Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) group workshop for distressed veterans.

Methods: We collaborated with veteran-serving community-based organizations to enhance outreach to veterans, especially those in rural areas. Veterans completed a baseline assessment and two follow-up assessments (1 month, 3 months) after workshop participation. Feasibility outcomes included reach (workshop recruitment and completion rates; veteran characteristics) and acceptability (open-ended survey question about satisfaction). Clinical outcomes included psychological distress (Outcome Questionnaire-45), stressor-related distress (PTSD Checklist-5), community reintegration (Military to Civilian Questionnaire), and meaning and purpose (PROMIS Short Form). Psychological flexibility (Action and Acceptance Questionnaire-II) - the proposed change mechanism underlying ACT - was also measured.

Results: Sixty-four veterans (50% rural, 39% self-identified as female) participated in a virtual workshop (97.1% completion rate). Overall, veterans liked the format and interactive nature of workshops. Convenience was noted as a benefit, while connectivity issues were highlighted as a drawback. Veterans showed improvements in psychological distress (F(2,109) = 3.30; p = 0.041), stressor-related distress (F(2,110) = 9.50; p = 0.0002), community reintegration (F(2,108) = 4.34; p = 0.015), and meaning and purpose (F(2,100) = 4.06; p = 0.020) over time. No between-group differences were detected, based on rurality or gender.

Conclusion: Pilot findings were promising and warrant a larger randomized trial to assess the efficacy of the 1-day virtual ACT workshop. Integrating community-engaged and participatory-research designs can enhance the external validity of these future studies and promote greater health equity.

Keywords: Acceptance and commitment therapy; Community-engaged research; Rural; Veterans; Video telehealth.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

© 2023 The Authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort diagram.

References

    1. Trivedi R.B., Sun E.P.H., Pomerantz A., et al. Prevalence, comorbidity, and prognosis of mental health among US veterans. Am. J. Publ. Health. 2015;105(12):2564–2569. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302836.
    1. Fulton J.J., Calhoun P.S., Wagner H.R., et al. The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans: a meta-analysis. J. Anxiety Disord. 2015;31:98–107. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdix.2015.02.003.
    1. Magruder K.M., Yeager D.E. The prevalence of PTSD across war eras and the effect of deployment on PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatr. Ann. 2009;39(8) doi: 10.3928/00485713-20090728-04.
    1. Liu Y., Collins C., Wang K., Xie X., Bie R. The prevalence and trend of depression among veterans in the United States. J. Affect. Disord. 2019;245:724–727. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.031.
    1. Finnegan A., Randles R. BMJ Mil. Health e002045. 2022 January 18. Prevalence of common mental health disorders in military veterans: using primary healthcare data. Online ahead of print.
    1. Williamson V., Stevelink S.A., Greenberg K., Greenberg N N. Prevalence of mental health disorders in elderly US military veterans: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr. 2018;26(5):534–545. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.11.0.
    1. Lippa S.M., Fonda J.R., Fortier C.B., et al. Deployment‐related psychiatric and behavioral conditions and their association with functional disability in OEF/OIF/OND veterans. J. Trauma Stress. 2015;28(1):25–33. doi: 10.1002/jts.21979.
    1. Spelman J.F., Hunt S.C., Seal K.H., Burgo-Black A. Post deployment care for returning combat veterans. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2012;27(9):1200–1209. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2061-1.
    1. Sayer N.A., Noorbaloochi S., Frazier P., Carlson K., Gravely A., Murdoch M. Reintegration problems and treatment interests among Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans receiving VA medical care. Psychiatr. Serv. 2010;61(6):589–597. 10.1176.ps.2010.61.6.589.
    1. Fox A.B., Meyer E.C., Vogt D. Attitudes about the VA health-care setting, mental illness, and mental health treatment and their relationship with VA mental health service use among female and male OEF/OIF veterans. Psychol. Serv. 2015;12(1):49. doi: 10.1037/a0038269.
    1. Vogt D., Fox A.B., Di Leone B.A. Mental health beliefs and their relationship with treatment seeking among US OEF/OIF veterans. J. Trauma Stress. 2014;27(3):307–313. doi: 10.1002/jts.21919.
    1. Tanielian T., Woldetsadik M.A., Jaycox L.H., et al. Barriers to engaging service members in mental health care within the US military health system. Psychiatr. Serv. 2016;67(7):718–727. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500237.
    1. Zinzow H.M., Britt T.W., Pury C.L., Raymond M.A., McFadden A.C., Burnette C.m. Barriers and facilitators of mental health treatment seeking among active-duty army personnel. Mil. Psychol. 2013;25(5):514–535. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.136.
    1. Garcia H.A., Finley E.P., Ketchum N., Jakupcak M., Dassori A., Reyes S.C. A survey of perceived barriers and attitudes toward mental health care among OEF/OIF veterans at VA outpatient mental health clinics. Mil. Med. 2014;179(3):273–278. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00076.
    1. Buzza C., Ono S.S., Turvey C., et al. Distance is relative: unpacking a principal barrier in rural healthcare. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2011;26(Supp 2):648–654. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1762-1.
    1. Hudson T.J., Fortney J.C., Williams J.S., Austen M.A., Pope S.K., Hayes C.J. Effect of rural residence on use of VHA mental health care among OEF/OIF veterans. Psychiatr. Serv. 2014;65(12):1420–1425. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300041.
    1. Ohl M.E., Carrell M., Thurman A., et al. Availability of healthcare providers for rural veterans eligible for purchased care under the veterans choice act. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018;18(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018/s12913-018-3108-8.
    1. Dindo L., Roddy M.K., Boykin D.M., et al. Combination outreach and wellness intervention for distressed rural veterans: results of a multimethod pilot study. J. Behav. Med. 2020;4(4):440–453. doi: 10.1007/210865-020-00177-8.
    1. Baumann A.A., Cabassa L.J. Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020;20(1):190. 10.1186.s12913-020-4975-3.
    1. Wallerstein N., Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am. J. Publ. Health. 2010;100(S1):S40–S46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036.
    1. Wachen J.S., Dondanville K.A., Evans W.R., Morris K., Cole A. Adjusting the timeframe of evidence-based therapies for PTSD-massed treatments. Curr. Treat. Options Psychiatry. 2019;6(2):107–118. doi: 10.1007/s40501-019-00169-9.
    1. Dindo L., Van Liew J.R. J.J. Arch, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: a transdiagnostic behavioral intervention for mental health and medical conditions. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14(3):546–553. 10.1007-s13311-017-0521-3.
    1. Gloster A.T., Walder N., Levin M.E., Twohig M.P., Karekla M. The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: a review of meta-analyses. J. Contextual Behav. Sci. 2020;18:181–192. 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.09.009 Home | About | FAQ | My Ac.
    1. Hayes S.C., Strosahl K.D., Wilson K.G. second ed. Guilford Press; New York, New York: 2012. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: the Process and Practice of Mindful Change.
    1. Lindsay J.A., Hogan J.B., Ecker A.H., Day S.C., Chen P., Helm A. The importance of video visits in the time of COVID‐19. J. Rural Health. 2021;37(1):242–245. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12480.
    1. Molfenter T., Heitkamp T., Murphy A.A., Tapscott S., Behlman S., Cody O.J. Use of telehealth in mental health (MH) services during and after COVID-19. Community Ment. Health J. 2021;57(7):1244–1251. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00861-2.
    1. Hogan J., Boykin D., Schneck C.D., et al. Clinical lessons from virtual house calls in mental health: the doctor is in the house. Psychiatr. Clin. 2019;42(4):575–586. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2019.08.004.
    1. Polk K.L., et al. New Harbinger Publications; 2016. The Essential Guide to the ACT Matrix: A Step-by-step Approach to Using the ACT Matrix Model in Clinical Practice.
    1. Dindo L., Weinrib A., Marchman J. 2019. One-day ACT Workshops for Patients with Chronic Health Problems and Associated Emotional disorders.Innovations in ACT.
    1. Aertgeerts B., Buntinx F., Kester A. The value of the CAGE in screening for alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence in general clinical populations: a diagnostic meta-analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2004;57(1):30–39. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00254-3.
    1. Boswell D.L., White J.K., Sims S.D., Harrist R.S., Romans J.S. Reliability and validity of the outcome questionnaire–45.2. Psychol. Reproduire. 2013;112(3):689–693. 10.2466.02.08.PR0.112.3.689-693.
    1. Bowen D.J., Kreuter M., Spring B., et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009;36(5):452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
    1. Weathers F.W., Litz B.T., Keane T.M., Palmieri P.A., Marx B.P., Schnurr P.P. The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) 2013. Available from: The National Center for PTSD at.
    1. Sayer N.A., Frazier P., Orazem R.J., et al. Military to Civilian Questionnaire: a measure of postdeployment community reintegration difficulty among veterans using Department of Veterans Affairs medical care. J. Trauma Stress. 2011;24(6):660–670. doi: 10.1002/jts.20706.
    1. Salsman J.M., Park C.L., Hahn E.A., et al. Refining and supplementing candidate measures of psychological well-being for the NIH PROMIS®: qualitative results from a mixed cancer sample. Qual. Life Res. 2018;27(9):2471–2476. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1896-2.
    1. Bond F.W., Hayes S.C., Baer R.A., et al. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav. Ther. 2011;42:676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.
    1. Hsieh H., Shannon S.E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    1. Dindo L., Fiedorowicz J.G., Boykin D.M., et al. A randomized controlled trial for symptoms of anxiety and depression: effects of a 1-day acceptance and commitment training workshop. Ann. Clin. Psychiatr. 2021;33(4):258–269. doi: 10.12788/acp.0046.
    1. Dindo L., Recober A., Marchman J., O'Hara M.W., Turvey C. One-day behavioral intervention in depressed migraine patients: effects on headache. Headache. 2014;54(3):528–538. doi: 10.1111/head.12258.
    1. Dindo L., Zimmerman M.B., Hadlandsmyth K., et al. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for prevention of chronic postsurgical pain and opioid use in at-risk veterans: a pilot randomized controlled study. J. Pain. 2018;19(10):1211–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.016.
    1. Fletcher T.L., Hogan J.B., Keegan F., et al. Recent advances in delivering mental health treatment via video to home. Curr. Psychiatr. Rep. 2018;20:56. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0922-y.
    1. Gros D.F., Morland L.A., Greene C.J., et al. Delivery of evidence-based psychotherapy via video telehealth. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2013;35(4):506–521. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9363-4.
    1. J.-H. Kim, E. Desai, M.B. Cole, How the Rapid Shift to Telehealth leaves Many Community Health Centers behind During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Health Affairs Blog [Internet] June 2, 2020. Last accessed March 28,2023. Available at .
    1. Hirko K.A., Kerver J.M., Ford S., et al. Telehealth in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for rural health disparities. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2020;27(11):1816–1818. doi: 10.1093/jamia.ocaa156.
    1. McLean C.P., et al. The impact of COVID-19 on psychotherapy participation among individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder enrolled in treatment research. J. Trauma Stress. 2022;35(1):308–313.
    1. Penninx B.W.J.H., et al. How COVID-19 shaped mental health: from infection to pandemic effects. Nat. Med. 2022;28(10):2027–2037.
    1. Levin M.E., Haeger J.A., Pierce B.G., Twohig M.P. Web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for mental health problems in college students: a randomized controlled trial. Behav. Modif. 2017;41(1):141–162. doi: 10.1177/0145445516659645.
    1. Levin M.E., Pistorello J., Seeley J.R., Hayes S.C. Feasibility of a prototype web-based acceptance and commitment therapy prevention program for college students. J. Am. Coll. Health. 2014;62(1):20–30. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.843533.
    1. Lee E.B., Homan K.J., Morrison K.L., Ong C.W., Levin M.E., Twohig M.P. Acceptance and commitment therapy for trichotillomania: a randomized controlled trial of adults and adolescents. Behav. Modif. 2020;44(1):70–91. doi: 10.1177/0145445518794366.
    1. Alegria M., Trinh-Shevrin C., Bowen C., Ault A., Lincoln A., Wells K.B. In: Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity. third ed. Wallerstein N., Duran B., Oetzel J., Minkler J J., editors. Jossy-Bass:A Wiley Brand; San Francisco, CA: 2017. CBPR in health care settings; pp. 141–156.
    1. Horowitz C.R., Robinson M., Seifer S. Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation. 2009;119(19):2633–2642. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729863.
    1. LaDonna K.A., Taylor T., Lingard L. Why open-ended survey questions are unlikely to support rigorous qualitative insights. Acad. Med. 2018;93(3):347–349.
    1. Dedert E.A., et al. Association of trauma exposure with psychiatric morbidity in military veterans who have served since September 11, 2001. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2009;43(9):830–836.
    1. Wolgast M. What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure? Behav. Ther. 2014;45:831–839.
    1. Rochefort C., Baldwin A.S., Chmielewski M. Experiential avoidance: an examination of the construct validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ. Behav. Ther. 2018;49(3):435–449.
    1. Tyndall I., et al. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) as a measure of experiential avoidance: concerns over discriminant validity. J. Contextual Behav. Sci. 2019;12:278–284.
    1. Renshaw T.L. Probing the relative psychometric validity of three measures of psychological inflexibility. J. Contextual Behav. Sci. 2018;7:47–54.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅