Pregnancy imprints regulatory memory that sustains anergy to fetal antigen

Jared H Rowe, James M Ertelt, Lijun Xin, Sing Sing Way, Jared H Rowe, James M Ertelt, Lijun Xin, Sing Sing Way

Abstract

Pregnancy is an intricately orchestrated process where immune effector cells with fetal specificity are selectively silenced. This requires the sustained expansion of immune-suppressive maternal FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells (T(reg) cells), because even transient partial ablation triggers fetal-specific effector T-cell activation and pregnancy loss. In turn, many idiopathic pregnancy complications proposed to originate from disrupted fetal tolerance are associated with blunted maternal T(reg) expansion. Importantly, however, the antigen specificity and cellular origin of maternal T(reg) cells that accumulate during gestation remain incompletely defined. Here we show that pregnancy selectively stimulates the accumulation of maternal FOXP3(+) CD4 cells with fetal specificity using tetramer-based enrichment that allows the identification of rare endogenous T cells. Interestingly, after delivery, fetal-specific T(reg) cells persist at elevated levels, maintain tolerance to pre-existing fetal antigen, and rapidly re-accumulate during subsequent pregnancy. The accelerated expansion of T(reg) cells during secondary pregnancy was driven almost exclusively by proliferation of fetal-specific FOXP3(+) cells retained from prior pregnancy, whereas induced FOXP3 expression and proliferation of pre-existing FOXP3(+) cells each contribute to T(reg) expansion during primary pregnancy. Furthermore, fetal resorption in secondary compared with primary pregnancy becomes more resilient to partial maternal FOXP3(+) cell ablation. Thus, pregnancy imprints FOXP3(+) CD4 cells that sustain protective regulatory memory to fetal antigen. We anticipate that these findings will spark further investigation on maternal regulatory T-cell specificity that unlocks new strategies for improving pregnancy outcomes and novel approaches for therapeutically exploiting T(reg) cell memory.

Conflict of interest statement

Author Information

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1. Accumulation of maternal CD4 and…
Figure 1. Accumulation of maternal CD4 and Foxp3+ Tregs with fetal-specificity during gestation
a, Total 2W1S+ or 2W1S+Foxp3+ CD4 cells in B6 females impregnated by Balb/c-2W1S males. b, Percent Foxp3+ among 2W1S+ or 2W1S− CD4 cells. c, Percent Ki67+ among 2W1S+Foxp3+ or 2W1S+Foxp3− CD4 cells. d, Percent Helioshi among 2W1S+Foxp3+or 2W1S−Foxp3+ CD4 cells. e, Percent Foxp3+ among Foxp3DTR/DTR donor (CD45.1+) or Foxp3WT/WT recipient (CD45.2+) 2W1S+ CD4 cells midgestation (E11.5) by Balb/c-2W1S males, with DT treatment (top) or no DT controls (bottom). Bar, mean ± one standard error.
Figure 2. Accelerated expansion of maternal Tregs…
Figure 2. Accelerated expansion of maternal Tregs with fetal-specificity during secondary pregnancy
a, Percent Foxp3+ among virgin (primary pregnancy) or postpartum (secondary pregnancy) females before mating or midgestation (E11.5) by Balb/c-2W1S males. b, Percent Foxp3+ among postpartum donor (CD45.1+) or naïve recipient (CD45.2+) 2W1S+ CD4 cells midgestation by Balb/c-2W1S males. c, Percent Foxp3+ among Treg-ablated Foxp3DTR/DTR postpartum donor (CD45.1+) or naïve recipient (CD45.2+) 2W1S+ CD4 cells midgestation. Bar, mean ± one standard error.
Figure 3. The postpartum environment maintains anergy…
Figure 3. The postpartum environment maintains anergy for maternal CD4 cells with pre-existing fetal-specificity
a, IFN-γ producing 2W1S+ CD4 cells five days after Lm-2W1S inoculation in virgin, or pregnant females midgestation by Balb/c-2W1S or Balb/c males. b, IFN-γ producing 2W1S+ CD4 cells five days after Lm-2W1S inoculation in postpartum mice previously impregnated by Balb/c-2W1S or Balb/c males. c, IFN-γ producing postpartum donor (CD45.2+CD90.2+), naive donor (CD45.2+CD90.1+), or naive recipient (CD45.1+) CD4 cells five days after Lm-2W1S inoculation and stimulation with PMA/ionomycin. Bar, mean ± one standard error.
Figure 4. Maternal postpartum Tregs mitigate IFN-γ…
Figure 4. Maternal postpartum Tregs mitigate IFN-γ responsiveness and mediate resiliency to fetal resorption in secondary pregnancy
a, Representative plots illustrating the majority (>96%) of Foxp3+ cells are derived from adoptively transferred CD4 in DT treated Foxp3DTR/DTR mice. b, IFN-γ producing 2W1S+ cells among CD45.1+CD45.2− cells, accumulation of 2W1S+Foxp3+ cells, and Helios expression among 2W1S+Foxp3+ Tregs five days after Lm-2W1S inoculation. c, Percent fetal resorption during primary (open) or secondary (shaded) allogeneic pregnancy for Foxp3WT/WT, Foxp3DTR/WT, or Foxp3DTR/DTR females five days after DT initiation beginning midgestation. Bar, mean ± one standard error.

References

    1. Kahn DA, Baltimore D. Pregnancy induces a fetal antigen-specific maternal T regulatory cell response that contributes to tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:9299–9304.
    1. Rowe JH, Ertelt JM, Aguilera MN, Farrar MA, Way SS. Foxp3(+) Regulatory T Cell Expansion Required for Sustaining Pregnancy Compromises Host Defense against Prenatal Bacterial Pathogens. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10:54–64.
    1. Prins JR, et al. Preeclampsia is associated with lower percentages of regulatory T cells in maternal blood. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28:300–311.
    1. Santner-Nanan B, et al. Systemic increase in the ratio between Foxp3+ and IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells in healthy pregnancy but not in preeclampsia. J Immunol. 2009;183:7023–7030.
    1. Sasaki Y, et al. Decidual and peripheral blood CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in early pregnancy subjects and spontaneous abortion cases. Molecular human reproduction. 2004;10:347–353.
    1. Moon JJ, et al. Naive CD4(+) T cell frequency varies for different epitopes and predicts repertoire diversity and response magnitude. Immunity. 2007;27:203–213.
    1. Aluvihare VR, Kallikourdis M, Betz AG. Regulatory T cells mediate maternal tolerance to the fetus. Nature immunology. 2004;5:266–271.
    1. Andersen KG, Nissen JK, Betz AG. Comparative Genomics Reveals Key Gain-of-Function Events in Foxp3 during Regulatory T Cell Evolution. Frontiers in immunology. 2012;3:113.
    1. Lathrop SK, et al. Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature. 2011;478:250–254.
    1. Shafiani S, Tucker-Heard G, Kariyone A, Takatsu K, Urdahl KB. Pathogen-specific regulatory T cells delay the arrival of effector T cells in the lung during early tuberculosis. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2010;207:1409–1420.
    1. Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annual review of immunology. 2012;30:531–564.
    1. Wing K, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells exert checks and balances on self tolerance and autoimmunity. Nature immunology. 2010;11:7–13.
    1. Hsieh CS, Lee HM, Lio CW. Selection of regulatory T cells in the thymus. Nature reviews. 2012;12:157–167.
    1. Suffia IJ, Reckling SK, Piccirillo CA, Goldszmid RS, Belkaid Y. Infected site-restricted Foxp3+ natural regulatory T cells are specific for microbial antigens. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2006;203:777–788.
    1. Rosenblum MD, et al. Response to self antigen imprints regulatory memory in tissues. Nature. 2011;480:538–542.
    1. Moon JJ, et al. Quantitative impact of thymic selection on Foxp3+ and Foxp3− subsets of self-peptide/MHC class II-specific CD4+ T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:14602–14607.
    1. Robertson SA. Immune regulation of conception and embryo implantation-all about quality control? Journal of reproductive immunology. 2010;85:51–57.
    1. Kallikourdis M, Andersen KG, Welch KA, Betz AG. Alloantigen-enhanced accumulation of CCR5+ ‘effector’ regulatory T cells in the gravid uterus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:594–599.
    1. Munoz-Suano A, Hamilton AB, Betz AG. Gimme shelter: the immune system during pregnancy. Immunological reviews. 2011;241:20–38.
    1. Thornton AM, et al. Expression of Helios, an Ikaros transcription factor family member, differentiates thymic-derived from peripherally induced Foxp3+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol. 2010;184:3433–3441.
    1. Gottschalk RA, Corse E, Allison JP. Expression of Helios in peripherally induced Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2012;188:976–980.
    1. Kim JM, Rasmussen JP, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells prevent catastrophic autoimmunity throughout the lifespan of mice. Nature immunology. 2007;8:191–197.
    1. Erlebacher A, Vencato D, Price KA, Zhang D, Glimcher LH. Constraints in antigen presentation severely restrict T cell recognition of the allogeneic fetus. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2007;117:1399–1411.
    1. Ertelt JM, et al. Selective priming and expansion of antigen-specific Foxp3− CD4+ T cells during Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Immunol. 2009;182:3032–3038.
    1. Pepper M, et al. Different routes of bacterial infection induce long-lived TH1 memory cells and short-lived TH17 cells. Nature immunology. 2010;11:83–89.
    1. Koch MA, et al. The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nature immunology. 2009;10:595–602.
    1. Wakim LM, Bevan MJ. From the thymus to longevity in the periphery. Current opinion in immunology. 2010;22:274–278.
    1. Trupin LS, Simon LP, Eskenazi B. Change in paternity: a risk factor for preeclampsia in multiparas. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass. 1996;7:240–244.
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ (Clinical research ed. 2000;321:1255–1259.
    1. Moon JJ, et al. Tracking epitope-specific T cells. Nature protocols. 2009;4:565–581.
    1. Wirth R, An FY, Clewell DB. Highly efficient protoplast transformation system for Streptococcus faecalis and a new Escherichia coli-S. faecalis shuttle vector. Journal of bacteriology. 1986;165:831–836.
    1. Smith K, Youngman P. Use of a new integrational vector to investigate compartment-specific expression of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIM gene. Biochimie. 1992;74:705–711.
    1. Foulds KE, et al. Cutting edge: CD4 and CD8 T cells are intrinsically different in their proliferative responses. J Immunol. 2002;168:1528–1532.
    1. Rudd BD, et al. Nonrandom attrition of the naive CD8+ T-cell pool with aging governed by T-cell receptor:pMHC interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:13694–13699.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅