Teclistamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Philippe Moreau, Alfred L Garfall, Niels W C J van de Donk, Hareth Nahi, Jesús F San-Miguel, Albert Oriol, Ajay K Nooka, Thomas Martin, Laura Rosinol, Ajai Chari, Lionel Karlin, Lotfi Benboubker, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Nizar Bahlis, Rakesh Popat, Britta Besemer, Joaquín Martínez-López, Surbhi Sidana, Michel Delforge, Lixia Pei, Danielle Trancucci, Raluca Verona, Suzette Girgis, Shun X W Lin, Yunsi Olyslager, Mindy Jaffe, Clarissa Uhlar, Tara Stephenson, Rian Van Rampelbergh, Arnob Banerjee, Jenna D Goldberg, Rachel Kobos, Amrita Krishnan, Saad Z Usmani, Philippe Moreau, Alfred L Garfall, Niels W C J van de Donk, Hareth Nahi, Jesús F San-Miguel, Albert Oriol, Ajay K Nooka, Thomas Martin, Laura Rosinol, Ajai Chari, Lionel Karlin, Lotfi Benboubker, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Nizar Bahlis, Rakesh Popat, Britta Besemer, Joaquín Martínez-López, Surbhi Sidana, Michel Delforge, Lixia Pei, Danielle Trancucci, Raluca Verona, Suzette Girgis, Shun X W Lin, Yunsi Olyslager, Mindy Jaffe, Clarissa Uhlar, Tara Stephenson, Rian Van Rampelbergh, Arnob Banerjee, Jenna D Goldberg, Rachel Kobos, Amrita Krishnan, Saad Z Usmani

Abstract

Background: Teclistamab is a T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody that targets both CD3 expressed on the surface of T cells and B-cell maturation antigen expressed on the surface of myeloma cells. In the phase 1 dose-defining portion of the study, teclistamab showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Methods: In this phase 1-2 study, we enrolled patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least three therapy lines, including triple-class exposure to an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody. Patients received a weekly subcutaneous injection of teclistamab (at a dose of 1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) after receiving step-up doses of 0.06 mg and 0.3 mg per kilogram. The primary end point was the overall response (partial response or better).

Results: Among 165 patients who received teclistamab, 77.6% had triple-class refractory disease (median, five previous therapy lines). With a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the overall response rate was 63.0%, with 65 patients (39.4%) having a complete response or better. A total of 44 patients (26.7%) were found to have no minimal residual disease (MRD); the MRD-negativity rate among the patients with a complete response or better was 46%. The median duration of response was 18.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.9 to not estimable). The median duration of progression-free survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 17.1). Common adverse events included cytokine release syndrome (in 72.1% of the patients; grade 3, 0.6%; no grade 4), neutropenia (in 70.9%; grade 3 or 4, 64.2%), anemia (in 52.1%; grade 3 or 4, 37.0%), and thrombocytopenia (in 40.0%; grade 3 or 4, 21.2%). Infections were frequent (in 76.4%; grade 3 or 4, 44.8%). Neurotoxic events occurred in 24 patients (14.5%), including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 5 patients (3.0%; all grade 1 or 2).

Conclusions: Teclistamab resulted in a high rate of deep and durable response in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cytopenias and infections were common; toxic effects that were consistent with T-cell redirection were mostly grade 1 or 2. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MajesTEC-1 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03145181 and NCT04557098.).

Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Figures

Figure 1.. Response to Teclistamab in Patients…
Figure 1.. Response to Teclistamab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Panel A shows the rates of stringent complete response, complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response in 165 patients who were treated with teclistamab. A stringent complete response was defined as a complete response with a normal serum free light-chain ratio and an absence of clonal plasma cells on immunohistochemical analysis or negative two-color to four-color flow cytometry. Differences in percentage totals are due to rounding. Responses were assessed by an independent review committee with a cutoff date of March 16, 2022. Panel B shows responses over time in the 104 patients who had an overall response (partial response or better) among the 165 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose.
Figure 2.. Kaplan–Meier Analysis of Response Duration…
Figure 2.. Kaplan–Meier Analysis of Response Duration and of Progression-free and Overall Survival.
Panel A shows the duration of response to teclistamab therapy in the 104 patients who had an overall response (partial response or better) among the 165 patients who received the recommended phase 2 weekly dose of 1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight. Panel B shows progression-free survival in the overall population. Disease progression was assessed by an independent review committee on the basis of the criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group. Panel C shows overall survival among the 165 patients. Tick marks indicate censored data. NE denotes not estimable.
Figure 3.. Changes in Levels of Soluble…
Figure 3.. Changes in Levels of Soluble B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) after Teclistamab Therapy, According to Tumor Response.
Serum levels of soluble BCMA were assessed as a potential marker of tumor burden and response. As expected, reductions in soluble BCMA levels were greater in patients with a better response than in those with a poor response. Shown is the percent change from baseline in serum soluble BCMA levels on day 1 of cycle 4 according to the best response in 81 patients with plasma samples that could be evaluated as of August 9, 2021 (data-cutoff date for pharmacokinetic analyses). The median percent change in soluble BCMA levels was a reduction of 82% in 27 patients with a stringent complete response (sCR), a reduction of 87% in the 8 patients with a complete response (CR), a reduction of 90% in 34 patients with a very good partial response (VGPR), an increase of 175% among the 3 patients with a partial response (PR), an increase of 381% in the 1 patient with a minimal response (MR), an increase of 522% in the 6 patients with stable disease (SD), and an increase of 1437% in the 2 patients with progressive disease (PD). The boxes represent interquartile ranges, the horizontal line in each box represents the median, and the whiskers show the minimum and maximum values after the exclusion of outliers (circles) that were more than 1.5 times the values represented at each end of the box.

References

    1. Yong K, Delforge M, Driessen C, et al. Multiple myeloma: patient outcomes in real-world practice. Br J Haematol 2016;175:252–64.
    1. Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Hemasphere 2021;5(2):e528.
    1. Kumar SK, Callander NS, Adekola K, et al. Multiple myeloma, version 3.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020;18:1685–717.
    1. Mateos M-V, Weisel K, De Stefano V, et al. LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2022;36:1371–6.
    1. Lonial S, Lee HC, Badros A, et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-2): a two-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:207–21.
    1. Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr, Shah N, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2021;384:705–16.
    1. Shah N, Chari A, Scott E, Mezzi K, Usmani SZ. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in multiple myeloma: rationale for targeting and current therapeutic approaches. Leukemia 2020;34:985–1005.
    1. Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): a phase 1b/2 open-label study. Lancet 2021;398:314–24.
    1. Usmani SZ, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen χ CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MajesTEC-1): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study. Lancet 2021;398:665–74.
    1. Rajkumar SV, Harousseau J-L, Durie B, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 2011;117:4691–5.
    1. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2016;17(8):e328–e346.
    1. Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, et al. ASTCT consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019;25:625–38.
    1. Girgis S, Lin SXW, Pillarisetti K, et al. Teclistamab and talquetamab modulate levels of soluble B-cell maturation antigen in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:Suppl:8047. abstract.
    1. Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Anderson KC, et al. A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv 2020;4:5988–99.
    1. San-Miguel J, Avet-Loiseau H, Paiva B, et al. Sustained minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and the impact of daratumumab in MAIA and ALCYONE. Blood 2022;139:492–501.
    1. Kiss S, Gede N, Hegyi P, et al. Addition of daratumumab to multiple myeloma backbone regimens significantly improves clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sci Rep 2021;11:21916.
    1. Rosiñol L, Beksac M, Zamagni E, et al. Expert review on soft-tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: definition, disease assessment and treatment consid-erations. Br J Haematol 2021;194:496–507.
    1. Pillarisetti K, Powers G, Luistro L, et al. Teclistamab is an active T cell-redirecting bispecific antibody against B-cell maturation antigen for multiple myeloma. Blood Adv 2020;4:4538–49.
    1. Huehls AM, Coupet TA, Sentman CL. Bispecific T-cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Cell Biol 2015;93:290–6.
    1. Strohl WR, Naso M. Bispecific T-cell redirection versus chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells as approaches to kill cancer cells. Antibodies (Basel) 2019;8:41.
    1. Hutchings M, Mous R, Clausen MR, et al. Dose escalation of subcutaneous epcoritamab in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an open-label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet 2021;398:1157–69.
    1. Moreau P, Usmani SZ, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) of teclistamab (tec) versus belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) for the treatment of patients (pts) with triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol 2022;40:8035. abstract.
    1. Nucci M, Anaissie E. Infections in patients with multiple myeloma in the era of high-dose therapy and novel agents. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:1211–25.
    1. Vijenthira A, Gong IY, Fox TA, et al. Outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3377 patients. Blood 2020;136:2881–92.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅