Weekly Lonapegsomatropin in Treatment-Naïve Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: The Phase 3 heiGHt Trial

Paul S Thornton, Aristides K Maniatis, Elena Aghajanova, Elena Chertok, Elpis Vlachopapadopoulou, Zhengning Lin, Wenjie Song, Eva Dam Christoffersen, Vibeke Miller Breinholt, Tatiana Kovalenko, Elene Giorgadze, Maria Korpal-Szczyrska, Paul L Hofman, David B Karpf, Aimee D Shu, Michael Beckert, Paul S Thornton, Aristides K Maniatis, Elena Aghajanova, Elena Chertok, Elpis Vlachopapadopoulou, Zhengning Lin, Wenjie Song, Eva Dam Christoffersen, Vibeke Miller Breinholt, Tatiana Kovalenko, Elene Giorgadze, Maria Korpal-Szczyrska, Paul L Hofman, David B Karpf, Aimee D Shu, Michael Beckert

Abstract

Context: For children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), treatment burden with daily somatropin injections [human growth hormone (hGH)] is high, which may lead to poor adherence and suboptimal overall treatment outcomes. Lonapegsomatropin (TransCon hGH) is an investigational long-acting, once-weekly prodrug for the treatment of GHD.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin.

Design: The heiGHt trial was a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 52-week Phase 3 trial (NCT02781727).

Setting: This trial took place at 73 sites across 15 countries.

Patients: This trial enrolled and dosed 161 treatment-naïve, prepubertal patients with GHD.

Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive lonapegsomatropin 0.24 mg hGH/kg/week or an equivalent weekly dose of somatropin delivered daily.

Main outcome measure: The primary end point was annualized height velocity (AHV) at week 52. Secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline in height SD scores (SDS).

Results: Least squares (LS) mean (SE) AHV at 52 weeks was 11.2 (0.2) cm/year for lonapegsomatropin vs 10.3 (0.3) cm/year for daily somatropin (P = 0.009), with lonapegsomatropin demonstrating both noninferiority and superiority over daily somatropin. LS mean (SE) height SDS increased from baseline to week 52 by 1.10 (0.04) vs 0.96 (0.05) in the weekly lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin groups (P = 0.01). Bone age/chronological age ratio, adverse events, tolerability, and immunogenicity were similar between groups.

Conclusions: The trial met its primary objective of noninferiority in AHV and further showed superiority of lonapegsomatropin compared to daily somatropin, with similar safety, in treatment-naïve children with GHD.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Transient conjugation. Lonapegsomatropin is a long-acting prodrug consisting of the parent drug, unmodified somatropin; an inert carrier; and a proprietary linker that temporarily binds the somatropin and carrier. The carrier has a shielding effect that minimizes renal excretion and receptor-mediated clearance. Following autocleavage of the linker under physiologic conditions, lonapegsomatropin predictably releases somatropin within therapeutic levels over one week.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Screening, randomization, and follow-up.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Subgroup analysis of annualized height velocity. Lines represent 95% CI.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Change from baseline in height SD score.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(A) Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) weekly profile following lonapegsomatropin administration. (B) Average IGF-1 SD score (SDS) over 52 weeks of treatment. (C) Observed IGF-1 SDS at baseline, peaks, and troughs for the lonapegsomatropin group. (A) shows the IGF-1 profile from a lonapegsomatropin population subset (n = 11) over 7 days following the 13th dose, with a steady state SDS difference between peak and trough of approximately 2. The box-and-whisker plots in (B) show the derived average (lonapegsomatropin) and observed (daily somatropin) IGF-1 SDS over 52 weeks in the intention-to-treat population. For the daily somatropin group, average IGF-1 SDS were represented by observed values given the relative stability of IGF-1 levels with daily somatropin. At all visits, the lonapegsomatropin group had a higher average IGF-1 SDS, thus reaching a range of IGF-1 SDS 0-2 (shaded grey area) sooner than did the daily somatropin group. For each box-and-whisker plot, the upper and lower box edges represent the 75th and 25th percentiles. Within the box, the horizontal bar indicates the median, while the circle (for lonapegsomatropin) or plus sign (for daily somatropin) corresponds to the mean. The upper and lower ends of the whiskers represent the highest and lowest observed values within 1.5 times the interquartile range above and below the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. Outside the box, open circles (lonapegsomatropin) and plus signs (daily somatropin) correspond to observed values beyond 1.5 times the interquartile range above and below the 75th and 25th percentiles. Similarly, the box-and-whisker plots for observed IGF-1 levels for lonapegsomatropin-treated subjects at baseline, troughs (weeks 5 and 52), and peaks (weeks 13, 26, and 39) are presented in (C). The circles represent individual subject levels.

References

    1. Deijen JB, van Driel MI, Drent ML. The involvement of the GH/IGF-I axis in cognitive functions of adult patients and healthy subjects. Open Endocrinol J. 2012;6:68-79.
    1. Hazem A, Elamin MB, Bancos I. Body composition and quality of life in adults treated with GH therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(1):13-20.
    1. Isgaard J, Arcopinto M, Karason K, Cittadini A. GH and the cardiovascular system: an update on a topic at heart. Endocrine. 2015;48(1):25-35.
    1. Møller N, Jørgensen JO. Effects of growth hormone on glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism in human subjects. Endocr Rev. 2009;30(2):152-177.
    1. Guyda HJ. Four decades of growth hormone therapy for short children: what have we achieved? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(12):4307-4316.
    1. Fisher BG, Acerini CL. Understanding the growth hormone therapy adherence paradigm: a systematic review. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;79(4):189-196.
    1. Christiansen JS, Backeljauw PF, Bidlingmaier M, et al. . Growth hormone research society perspective on the development of long-acting growth hormone preparations. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(6):C1-8.
    1. Chatelain P, Malievskiy O, Radziuk K, et al. ; TransCon GH Working Group . A randomized Phase 2 study of long-acting TransCon GH vs daily GH in childhood GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(5):1673-1682.
    1. Sprogøe K, Mortensen E, Karpf DB, Leff JA. The rationale and design of TransCon Growth Hormone for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency. Endocr Connect. 2017;6(8):R171-R181.
    1. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child. 1976;51(3):170-179.
    1. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, et al. . 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002;( 246):1-190.
    1. Cole TJ. Galton’s midparent height revisited. Ann Hum Biol. 2000;27(4):401-405.
    1. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Takaishi M. Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. II. Arch Dis Child. 1966;41(220):613-635.
    1. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Takaishi M. Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. I. Arch Dis Child. 1966;41(219):454-471.
    1. Bidlingmaier M, Friedrich N, Emeny RT, et al. . Reference intervals for insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) from birth to senescence: results from a multicenter study using a new automated chemiluminescence IGF-I immunoassay conforming to recent international recommendations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):1712-1721.
    1. Friedrich N, Wolthers OD, Arafat AM, et al. . Age- and sex-specific reference intervals across life span for insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) and the IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio measured by new automated chemiluminescence assays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):1675-1686.
    1. Reiter EO, Attie KM, Moshang T Jr, et al. ; Genentech, Inc.-Alkermes, Inc. Collaborative Study Group . A multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of sustained release GH in the treatment of naive pediatric patients with GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(10):4700-4706.
    1. de Schepper J, Rasmussen MH, Gucev Z, Eliakim A, Battelino T. Long-acting pegylated human GH in children with GH deficiency: a single-dose, dose-escalation trial investigating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(3):401-409.
    1. Touraine P, D’Souza GA, Kourides I, et al. ; GH Lipoatrophy Study Group . Lipoatrophy in GH deficient patients treated with a long-acting pegylated GH. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(4):533-540.
    1. Khadilkar V, Radjuk KA, Bolshova E, et al. . 24-month use of once-weekly GH, LB03002, in prepubertal children with GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(1):126-132.
    1. Wit JM, Ranke MB, Albertsson-Wikland K, et al. . Personalized approach to growth hormone treatment: clinical use of growth prediction models. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;79(5):257-270.
    1. Straetemans S, De Schepper J, Thomas M, Verlinde F, Rooman R; BESPEED . Validation of prediction models for near adult height in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency treated with growth hormone: a belgian registry study. Horm Res Paediatr. 2016;86(3):161-168.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A; KIGS International Board . Observed and predicted growth responses in prepubertal children with growth disorders: guidance of growth hormone treatment by empirical variables. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(3):1229-1237.
    1. Savendahl L, Battelino T, Brod M, et al. ; Real 3 Study Group . Once-weekly somapacitan vs daily GH in children with GH deficiency: results from a randomized phase 2 trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(4):e1847-e1861.
    1. Deal C, Pastrak A, Silverman LA, Valluri SR, Wajnrajch M, Cara JF. OR10-06 somatrogon growth hormone in the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency: results of the pivotal pediatric phase 3 clinical trial. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4(Suppl 1):OR10-06.
    1. Surya S, Horowitz JF, Goldenberg N, et al. . The pattern of growth hormone delivery to peripheral tissues determines insulin-like growth factor-1 and lipolytic responses in obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2828-2834.
    1. Jørgensen JO, Møller N, Lauritzen T, Alberti KG, Orskov H, Christiansen JS. Evening versus morning injections of growth hormone (GH) in GH-deficient patients: effects on 24-hour patterns of circulating hormones and metabolites. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70(1):207-214.
    1. Laursen T, Møller J, Jørgensen JO, Orskov H, Christiansen JS. Bioavailability and bioactivity of intravenous vs subcutaneous infusion of growth hormone in GH-deficient patients. Clin Endocrinol. 1996;45(3):333-339.
    1. Farnum CE, Lenox M, Zipfel W, Horton W, Williams R. In vivo delivery of fluoresceinated dextrans to the murine growth plate: imaging of three vascular routes by multiphoton microscopy. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006;288(1):91-103.
    1. Löfqvist C, Andersson E, Gelander L, et al. . Reference values for insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and the ratio of insulin-like growth factor-I to IGFBP-3 throughout childhood and adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(3):1420-1427.
    1. Reinehr T, Lindberg A, Koltowska-Häggström M, Ranke M. Is growth hormone treatment in children associated with weight gain?–longitudinal analysis of KIGS data. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;81(5):721-726.
    1. Darendeliler F, Karagiannis G, Wilton P. Headache, idiopathic intracranial hypertension and slipped capital femoral epiphysis during growth hormone treatment: a safety update from the KIGS database. Horm Res. 2007;68(Suppl 5):41-47.
    1. Harris M, Hofman PL, Cutfield WS. Growth hormone treatment in children: review of safety and efficacy. Paediatr Drugs. 2004;6(2):93-106.
    1. Stochholm K, Kiess W. Long-term safety of growth hormone-A combined registry analysis. Clin Endocrinol. 2018;88(4):515-528.
    1. Rau H, Hersel U, Wegge T, et al. Preclinical data for a novel once-weekly human growth hormone prodrug. Paper presented at: International Congress of Endocrinology; March 2010, Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Amato G, Mazziotti G, Di Somma C, et al. . Recombinant growth hormone (GH) therapy in GH-deficient adults: a long-term controlled study on daily versus thrice weekly injections. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(10):3720-3725.
    1. Iglay K, Cao X, Mavros P, Joshi K, Yu S, Tunceli K. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of medication adherence with once-weekly versus once-daily therapy. Clin Ther. 2015;37(8):1813-21.e1.
    1. Shi L, Hodges M, Yurgin N, Boye KS. Impact of dose frequency on compliance and health outcomes: a literature review (1966-2006). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2007;7(2):187-202.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅