Single clips versus multi-firing clip device for closure of mucosal incisions after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)
Tessa Verlaan, Fraukje A M Ponds, Barbara A J Bastiaansen, Albert J Bredenoord, Paul Fockens, Tessa Verlaan, Fraukje A M Ponds, Barbara A J Bastiaansen, Albert J Bredenoord, Paul Fockens
Abstract
Background and aims: After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), the mucosal incision is closed with endoscopically applied clips. After each clip placement, a subsequent clipping device has to be introduced through the working channel. With the Clipmaster3, three consecutive clips can be placed without reloading which could reduce closure time. We performed a prospective study evaluating efficacy, safety, and ease of use. Closure using Clipmaster3 was compared to closure with standard clips. Methods: Patients undergoing closure with the Clipmaster3 were compared to patients who underwent POEM with standard clip closure. Results: In total, 12 consecutive POEM closures with Clipmaster3 were compared to 24 standard POEM procedures. The Clipmaster3 and the standard group did not differ in sex distribution, age (42 years [29 - 49] vs 41 years [34 - 54] P = 0.379), achalasia subtype, disease duration, length of the mucosal incision (25.0 mm [20 - 30] vs 20.0 mm [20 - 30], P = 1.0), and closure time (622 seconds [438 - 909] vs 599 seconds [488 - 664] P = 0.72). Endoscopically successful closure could be performed in all patients. The proportion of all clips used that were either displaced or discarded was larger for Clipmaster3 (8.8 %) compared to standard closure (2.0 %, P = 0.00782). Ease of handling VAS (visual analogue scale) score for Clipmaster3 did not differ between endoscopist and endoscopy nurse (7 out of 10). Conclusions: Clipmaster3 is feasible and safe for closure of mucosal incisions after POEM. Clipmaster3 was not associated with reduced closure time. Compared to standard closure, more Clipmaster3 clips were displaced or discarded to achieve successful closure. A training effect cannot be excluded as a cause of these results.
Study registration: NCT01405417.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Paul Fockens: Consultancy Olympus, Covidien, Fujifilm, Cook
Figures
References
- Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al.Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:265–271.
- NOSCAR POEM White Paper Committee . Stavropoulos S N, Desilets D J, Fuchs K H. et al.Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:1–15.
- Li Q L, Zhou P H. Perspective on peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: Zhongshan experience. Gut Liver. 2015;9:152–158.
- Patel K S, Calixte R, Modayil R J. et al.The light at the end of the tunnel: a single-operator learning curve analysis for per oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1181–1187.
- Verlaan T, Rohof W O, Bredenoord A J. et al.Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy on esophagogastric junction physiology in patients with achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:39–44.
- Meireles O R, Horgan S, Jacobsen G R. et al.Transesophageal endoscopic myotomy (TEEM) for the treatment of achalasia: the United States human experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1803–1809.
- Kurian A A, Bhayani N H, Reavis K. et al.Endoscopic suture repair of full thickness esophagotomy during per-oral esophageal myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3910.
- Saxena P, Chavez Y H, Kord Valeshabad A. et alternative method for mucosal flap closure during peroral endoscopic myotomy using an over-the-scope clipping device. Endoscopy. 2013;45:579–581.
- Li H Linghu E Wang X Fibrin sealant for closure of mucosal penetration at the cardia during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) Endoscopy 20124402UCTNE215–E216.
- Zhang Y, Wang X, Fan Z. Reclosure of ruptured incision after peroral endoscopic myotomy using endoloops and metallic clips. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:295.
Source: PubMed