Study protocol for a comparative diagnostic accuracy study of bedside tests used to detect arterial disease in diabetes: TEsting for Arterial disease in Diabetes (TrEAD) study

Pasha Normahani, Sepideh Poushpas, Mays Alaa, Vassiliki Bravis, Mohammed Aslam, Usman Jaffer, Pasha Normahani, Sepideh Poushpas, Mays Alaa, Vassiliki Bravis, Mohammed Aslam, Usman Jaffer

Abstract

Introduction: In the UK, over 7000 amputations are performed each year because of diabetes. Up to 80% of these are preceded by a foot ulcer and could therefore be prevented with improvements in ulcer care. Peripheral arterial disease is an important risk factor for the development of diabetic foot ulceration. However, its diagnosis in diabetes is challenging due to the presence of neuropathy and arterial calcification. Commonly used bedside tests either have low sensitivities or little supporting evidence to justify their use. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) has good correlation to angiography findings but a full scan is difficult to learn and time consuming to perform. We have previously demonstrated that a focused DUS of the distal anterior and posterior tibial arteries at the ankle (podiatry ankle duplex scan (PAD-scan)) can be readily learnt by novices and performed rapidly and accurately. The primary aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the PAD-scan and other commonly used bedside tests in detecting arterial disease in diabetes.

Methods and analysis: The study will include 305 patients presenting to diabetic foot clinics at two centres. Arterial assessment will be performed using the following index tests: the PAD-scan, pulse palpation, audible handheld Doppler, Ankle Brachial Pressure Index, Toe Brachial Pressure Index and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen. Patients will then undergo a full lower limb arterial DUS by a blinded vascular scientist as a reference test.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval was gained from NRES Committee London (REC reference 17/LO/1447). Findings will be disseminated by various methods including international presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04058626).

Keywords: diabetic foot; diabetic nephropathy & vascular disease; vascular surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Performing the PAD-scan in clinical practice (the persons depicted are not patients and the photo was taken with the participant’s knowledge and consent). (B) Schematic of PAD-scan, which involves scanning the distal anterior and posterior tibial arteries. PAD-scan, podiatry ankle duplex scan.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) An ‘abnormal’ monophasic arterial spectral waveform. (B) A ‘normal’ triphasic waveform.

References

    1. Moulik PK, Mtonga R, Gill GV. Amputation and mortality in new-onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology. Diabetes Care 2003;26:491–4. 10.2337/diacare.26.2.491
    1. Al-Rubeaan K, Al Derwish M, Ouizi S, et al. . Diabetic foot complications and their risk factors from a large retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0124446 10.1371/journal.pone.0124446
    1. Kerr M. Diabetic foot care in England: an economic study, 2017.
    1. Diabetes UK Putting feet first: national minimum skills framework, 2011.
    1. Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 2003;361:1545–51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13169-8
    1. Ince P, Abbas ZG, Lutale JK, et al. . Use of the SINBAD classification system and score in comparing outcome of foot ulcer management on three continents. Diabetes Care 2008;31:964–7. 10.2337/dc07-2367
    1. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. . Optimal organization of health care in diabetic foot disease: introduction to the Eurodiale study. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2007;6:11–17. 10.1177/1534734606297245
    1. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. . High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia 2007;50:18–25. 10.1007/s00125-006-0491-1
    1. Elgzyri T, Larsson J, Nyberg P, et al. . Early revascularization after admittance to a diabetic foot center affects the healing probability of ischemic foot ulcer in patients with diabetes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014;48:440–6. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.06.041
    1. Noronen K, Saarinen E, Albäck A, et al. . Analysis of the elective treatment process for critical limb ischaemia with tissue loss: diabetic patients require rapid revascularisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;53:206–13. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.10.023
    1. Brownrigg JRW, Hinchliffe RJ, Apelqvist J, et al. . Effectiveness of bedside investigations to diagnose peripheral artery disease among people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016;32:119–27. 10.1002/dmrr.2703
    1. Forsythe RO, Hinchliffe RJ. Assessment of foot perfusion in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016;32:232–8. 10.1002/dmrr.2756
    1. Vriens B, D'Abate F, Ozdemir BA, et al. . Clinical examination and non-invasive screening tests in the diagnosis of peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes-related foot ulceration. Diabet Med 2018;35:895–902. 10.1111/dme.13634
    1. Normahani P, Mustafa C, Standfield NJ, et al. . Management of peripheral arterial disease in diabetes: a national survey of podiatry practice in the United Kingdom. J Foot Ankle Res 2018;11:29 10.1186/s13047-018-0270-5
    1. Alavi A, Sibbald RG, Nabavizadeh R, et al. . Audible handheld Doppler ultrasound determines reliable and inexpensive exclusion of significant peripheral arterial disease. Vascular 2015;23:622–9. 10.1177/1708538114568703
    1. Tehan PE, Chuter VH. Use of hand-held Doppler ultrasound examination by podiatrists: a reliability study. J Foot Ankle Res 2015;8:36 10.1186/s13047-015-0097-2
    1. Eiberg JP, Grønvall Rasmussen JB, Hansen MA, et al. . Duplex ultrasound scanning of peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010;40:507–12. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.06.002
    1. Eiberg JP, Hansen MA, Grønvall Rasmussen JB, et al. . Minimum training requirement in ultrasound imaging of peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;36:325–30. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.006
    1. Normahani P, Agrawal R, Bravis V, et al. . Effectiveness of a multicenter training programme to teach point-of-care vascular ultrasound for the detection of peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. J Foot Ankle Res 2018;11:41 10.1186/s13047-018-0283-0
    1. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Quebedeaux TL, et al. . Surgical morbidity and the risk of amputation due to infected puncture wounds in diabetic versus nondiabetic adults. South Med J 1997;90:384–9. 10.1097/00007611-199704000-00004
    1. Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJE, Moxey P, et al. . A systematic review of scoring systems for diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med 2010;27:544–9. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02989.x
    1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. . Inter-Society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:S1–75. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.024
    1. Lewis JEA, Owens DR. The pulse volume recorder as a measure of peripheral vascular status in people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:75–80. 10.1089/dia.2009.0061
    1. Williams DT, Harding KG, Price P. An evaluation of the efficacy of methods used in screening for lower-limb arterial disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2206–10. 10.2337/diacare.28.9.2206
    1. Faglia E, Ezio F, Clerici G, et al. . Evaluation of feasibility of ankle pressure and foot oximetry values for the detection of critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2010;44:184–9. 10.1177/1538574409359430
    1. Dowd GS, Linge K, Bentley G. Measurement of transcutaneous oxygen pressure in normal and ischaemic skin. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:79–83. 10.1302/0301-620X.65B1.6822606
    1. Kumar R, Indrayan A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr 2011;48:277–87. 10.1007/s13312-011-0055-4
    1. Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, et al. . Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia 2008;51:747–55. 10.1007/s00125-008-0940-0

Source: PubMed

3
订阅