Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure
Michael R Bristow, Leslie A Saxon, John Boehmer, Steven Krueger, David A Kass, Teresa De Marco, Peter Carson, Lorenzo DiCarlo, David DeMets, Bill G White, Dale W DeVries, Arthur M Feldman, Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators, Michael R Bristow, Leslie A Saxon, John Boehmer, Steven Krueger, David A Kass, Teresa De Marco, Peter Carson, Lorenzo DiCarlo, David DeMets, Bill G White, Dale W DeVries, Arthur M Feldman, Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators
Abstract
Background: We tested the hypothesis that prophylactic cardiac-resynchronization therapy in the form of biventricular stimulation with a pacemaker with or without a defibrillator would reduce the risk of death and hospitalization among patients with advanced chronic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays.
Methods: A total of 1520 patients who had advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) due to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathies and a QRS interval of at least 120 msec were randomly assigned in a 1:2:2 ratio to receive optimal pharmacologic therapy (diuretics, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and spironolactone) alone or in combination with cardiac-resynchronization therapy with either a pacemaker or a pacemaker-defibrillator. The primary composite end point was the time to death from or hospitalization for any cause.
Results: As compared with optimal pharmacologic therapy alone, cardiac-resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker decreased the risk of the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.81; P=0.014), as did cardiac-resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker-defibrillator (hazard ratio, 0.80; P=0.01). The risk of the combined end point of death from or hospitalization for heart failure was reduced by 34 percent in the pacemaker group (P<0.002) and by 40 percent in the pacemaker-defibrillator group (P<0.001 for the comparison with the pharmacologic-therapy group). A pacemaker reduced the risk of the secondary end point of death from any cause by 24 percent (P=0.059), and a pacemaker-defibrillator reduced the risk by 36 percent (P=0.003).
Conclusions: In patients with advanced heart failure and a prolonged QRS interval, cardiac-resynchronization therapy decreases the combined risk of death from any cause or first hospitalization and, when combined with an implantable defibrillator, significantly reduces mortality.
Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
Source: PubMed