Relationship between segmental trunk control and gross motor development in typically developing infants aged from 4 to 12 months: a pilot study

Tamis W Pin, Penelope B Butler, Hon-Ming Cheung, Sandra Lai-Fong Shum, Tamis W Pin, Penelope B Butler, Hon-Ming Cheung, Sandra Lai-Fong Shum

Abstract

Background: Trunk control is generally considered to be related to gross motor development. However, this assumption has not been validated with clinical data. This pilot study was the first of its kind to examine the longitudinal development of segmental trunk control and gross motor development from 4 to 12 months of age in typically developing full-term infants.

Methods: A convenience cohort of 20 healthy full-term infants (mean gestation = 39.0 weeks, SD 1.2; mean birthweight = 2975.0 g, SD 297.0; males = 10) was recruited. All study infants were tested and scored monthly by independent assessors using the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale from 4 to 12 months of age.

Results: A developmental trend of segmental trunk control was found in the infants. Static vertical upright trunk control developed prior to active and reactive control. Statistically significant correlations were found between trunk control status and gross motor development mainly in prone and sitting positions from 8 months of age onwards (all p < 0.004, Spearman's r ranged from 0.644 to 0.798).

Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary clinical evidence to support the inter-dependency between vertical upright trunk control and gross motor development in young infants, particularly as upright functional skills are gained. This suggests that a dual focus on training upright trunk control alongside gross motor skills could be of benefit in the treatment of infants with movement disorders.

Keywords: Gross motor skills; Infants; Longitudinal; Postural control.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Developmental trends of segmental trunk control from 4 to 12 months in study infants. S- static control, A- active control, R- reactive control. Numbers on the y-axis are the SATCo trunk segmental level at which control was being learnt (1 = head control, 2 = upper thoracic level, 3 = mid-thoracic, 4 = lower thoracic, 5 = upper lumbar, 6 = lower lumber, 7 = full trunk control, and 8 = full trunk control achieved). The solid line represents the medians of the group at each age group. The boxes and the whiskers represent the spread of the data within that age group. The asterisks represent outliers in that age group. Please note that the SATCo is an ordinal scale and the non-integral numbers reported in the figure were purely for statistical purposes. In real life situations, no half-level would be credited to the infants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Segmental trunk control status and gross motor function from 4 to 12 months in study infants. LT = lower thoracic, UL = upper lumbar, LL = lower lumber, LFT = learning full trunk control, GFT = gained full trunk control

References

    1. Hadders-Algra M, Carlberg EB, editors. Postural control: a key issue in developmental disorders. London: Mac Keith Press; 2008.
    1. Heyrman L, Molenaers G, Desloovere K, Verheyden G, De Cat J, Monbaliu E, Feys H. A clinical tool to measure trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: the trunk control measurement scale. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(6):2624–2635. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.012.
    1. Bartlett D, Brimingham T. Validity and reliability of a pediatric reach test. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2003;15:84–92. doi: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000067885.63909.5C.
    1. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 5. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
    1. Butler PB, Major RE. The learning of motor control: biomechanical considerations. Physiother. 1992;78(1):6–11. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(10)61330-2.
    1. Saavedra SL, van Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH. Learning about gravity: segmental assessment of upright control as infants develop independent sitting. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108(8):2215–2229. doi: 10.1152/jn.01193.2011.
    1. Greco ALR, da Costa CSN, Tudella E. Identifying the level of trunk control of healthy term infants aged from 6 to 9 months. Inf Beh Dev. 2018;50:207–212. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.12.007.
    1. Rachwani J, Santamaria V, Saavedra SL, Wood S, Porter F, Woollacott MH. Segmental trunk control acquisition and reaching in typically developing infants. Exp Brain Res. 2013;228(1):131–139. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3544-y.
    1. Rachwani J, Santamaria V, Saavedra SL, Woollacott MH. The development of trunk control and its relation to reaching in infancy: a longitudinal study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9(94):1–12.
    1. Curtis DJ, Butler P, Saavedra S, Bencke J, Kallemose T, Sonne-Holm S, Woollacott M. The central role of trunk control in the gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(4):351–357. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12641.
    1. Pin TW, Butler PB, Shum S. Targeted training in managing children with poor trunk control: 4 case reports. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2018;30(2):e8–e13. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000499.
    1. Butler PB, Saavedra S, Sofranac M, Jarvis SE, Woollacott MH. Refinement, reliability, and validity of the segmental assessment of trunk control. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(3):246–257. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181e69490.
    1. Saether R, Helbostad JL, Riphagen II, Vik T. Clinical tools to assess balance in children and adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(11):988–999. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12162.
    1. Pin TW, Butler PB, Cheung H-M, Shum S. Segmental assessment of trunk control in infants from 4 to 9 months of age- a psychometric study. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(182):1–8.
    1. Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1994.
    1. Pin TW, Butler PB, Cheung H-M, Shum SL-F. Longitudinal development of segmental trunk control in full term and preterm infants- a pilot study: part I. Dev Neurorehabil. 2019:1–8. 10.1080/17518423.2019.1648580.
    1. Pin TW, de Valle K, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Clinimetric properties of the Alberta infant motor scale in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(3):278–286. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181e94481.
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
    1. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3. London: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.
    1. Darrah J, Piper M, Watt M-J. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta infant motor scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40(7):485–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb15399.x.
    1. Hadders-Algra M. Development of postural control. In: Hadders-Algra M, Carlberg EB, editors. Postural control: a key issue in developmental disorders. London: Mac Keith; 2008. pp. 22–73.
    1. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Development of postural control. In: Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH, editors. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 5. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016. pp. 183–205.
    1. Major RE, Johnson GR, Butler PB. Learning motor control in the upright position: a mechanical engineering approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2001;215(3):315–323. doi: 10.1243/0954411011535911.
    1. Sato NT, Tudella E. Influence of sitting positions and level of trunk control during reaching movements in late preterm and full-term infants. Front Pediatr. 2018;6(185):1-11.
    1. Butler P, Major RE. The missing link? Therapy issues of open and closed chains. Physiother. 2003;89(8):465–470. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60003-X.
    1. Harbourne RT, Dusing S. Motor development and control. In: Palisano RJ, Orlin MN, Schreiber J, editors. Campbell’s physical therapy for children. 5. Missouri: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 30–77.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅