REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy-does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system

Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Michele Altomare, Andrea Spota, Stefano Granieri, Stefania Cimbanassi, Osvaldo Chiara, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Michele Altomare, Andrea Spota, Stefano Granieri, Stefania Cimbanassi, Osvaldo Chiara

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively gained acceptance as the standard of care for acute appendicitis. Focusing on the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after a laparoscopic appendectomy, discordant data have been reported ranging from 1.5 to 20%. Besides, evidence advocating advantages from peritoneal irrigation over suction only are lacking. Most studies are burdened by a high level of heterogeneity regarding the severity of the appendicitis and modalities of peritoneal irrigation. One of the main drawbacks is the lack of an accepted classification for different degrees of appendicitis and peritoneal contamination. The aim of the study is to introduce a classification to clarify the relationship between grade of appendicitis, contamination, and postoperative incidence of IAA considering the surgeon's attitude toward irrigation or suction alone. Preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative predictive factors for infectious complication will also be assessed. This study is meant to be the first Italian multicenter resident-based observational study.

Methods: Patients suffering from acute appendicitis will be enrolled during a 1-year period, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants will fill an online form reporting all clinical and intra-operative data of each patient undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy. General surgery residents will be responsible for data collection. Our proposal of classification is based on the histological grade of appendicitis and intra-operative degree of peritoneal contamination. For each grade, a progressively increasing score is assigned.

Discussion: The observational nature of this study is mandatory to examine surgeons' attitude toward peritoneal contamination during laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis. Identification of different severity grades of acute appendicitis and their relationship with the development of postoperative abscesses is necessary. The resulting classification and score, even considering peritoneal lavage or suction alone, will define risk classes of peri-appendiceal contamination each one related to a specific incidence rate of postoperative IAA. Nowadays, maximum effort should be made to reach the best procedural standardization and surgical decision-making should be supported by solid evidence, especially in an emergency surgery setting.

Keywords: Appendicitis; Contamination; Infectious complication; Intra-abdominal abscess; Laparoscopy; Lavage; Suction; Surgical resident.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11(1):1–25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5.
    1. Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MAW, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4668–4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7.
    1. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10). 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3.
    1. Athanasiou C, Lockwood S, Markides GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: an update of the literature. World J Surg. 2017;41(12):3083–3099. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4123-3.
    1. Sartelli M, Baiocchi GL, Di Saverio S, et al. Prospective observational study on acute appendicitis worldwide (POSAW) World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0179-0.
    1. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992; a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infection Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:606–608. doi: 10.1017/S0195941700015241.
    1. CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. Chapter 17. 2019. .
    1. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Patient safety component manual 2019. 2019. .
    1. Cho J, Park I, Lee D, Sung K, Baek J, Lee J. Risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: analysis for consecutive 1,817 experiences. Dig Surg. 2015;32(5):375–381. doi: 10.1159/000438707.
    1. Snow HA, Choi JM, Cheng MWH, Chan STF. Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy; a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Int J Surg. 2016;28:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.099.
    1. St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Iqbal CW, et al. Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):581–585. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826a91e5.
    1. Sun F, Wang H, Zhang F, et al. Copious irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in adults. J Investig Surg. 2018;31(4):342–346. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1319995.
    1. Schlottmann F, Sadava EE, Peña ME, Rotholtz NA. Laparoscopic appendectomy: risk factors for postoperative intraabdominal abscess. World J Surg. 2017;41(5):1254–1258. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3869-y.
    1. Cao J, Tao F, Xing H, et al. Laparoscopic procedure is not independently associated with the development of intra-abdominal abscess after appendectomy: a multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech. 2017;27(5):409–414. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000460.
    1. Hajibandeh Shahab, Hajibandeh Shahin, Kelly Adam, Shah Jigar, Khan Rao Muhammad Asaf, Panda Nilanjan, Mansour Moustafa, Malik Sohail, Dalmia Sanjay. Irrigation Versus Suction Alone in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surgical Innovation. 2018;25(2):174–182. doi: 10.1177/1553350617753244.
    1. Siotos C, Stergios K, Prasath V, Seal SM, Duncan MD, Sakran JV, Habibi M. Irrigation versus suction in laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2019;235:237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.10.005.
    1. Gomes CA, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: proposal of a new comprehensive grading system based on clinical, imaging and laparoscopic findings. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:60. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0053-2.
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
    1. Posadas-Calleja JG, Stelfox HT, Ferland A, Zuege DJ, Niven DJ, Berthiaume L, Doig CJ. Derivation of a PIRO score for prediction of mortality in surgical patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. Am J Crit Care. 2018;27(4):287–294. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018576.
    1. Classification of Surgical Complications A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Carr NJ. The patology of acute appendicitis. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000;4(1):46–58. doi: 10.1053/adpa.2000.0046.
    1. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1495–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅