The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch, Lori Laffel, William V Tamborlane, Bruce W Bode, Bruce Buckingham, Peter Chase, Robert Clemons, Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer, Larry A Fox, Lisa K Gilliam, Elbert S Huang, Craig Kollman, Aaron J Kowalski, Jean M Lawrence, Joyce Lee, Nelly Mauras, Michael O'Grady, Katrina J Ruedy, Michael Tansey, Eva Tsalikian, Stuart A Weinzimer, Darrell M Wilson, Howard Wolpert, Tim Wysocki, Dongyuan Xing, Irl Hirsch, Lisa K Gilliam, Kathy Fitzpatrick, Dori Khakpour, Stuart A Weinzimer, William V Tamborlane, Brett Ives, Joan Bosson-Heenan, Howard Wolpert, Greeshma Shetty, Astrid Atakov-Castillo, Judith Giusti, Stacey O'Donnell, Suzanne Ghiloni, Bruce W Bode, Kelli O'Neil, Lisa Tolbert, Tim Wysocki, Larry A Fox, Nelly Mauras, Kimberly Englert, Joe Permuy, Bruce Buckingham, Darrel M Wilson, Jennifer Block, Kari Benassi, Eva Tsalikian, Michael Tansey, Debra Kucera, Julie Coffey, Joanne Cabbage, Lori Laffel, Kerry Milaszewski, Katherine Pratt, Elise Bismuth, Joyce Keady, Margie Lawlor, Peter Chase, Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer, Paul Wadwa, Laurel Messer, Victoria Gage, Patricia Burdick, Jean M Lawrence, Robert Clemons, Michelle Maeva, Bonnie Sattler, Roy W Beck, Craig Kollman, Dongyuan Xing, Judy Jackson, Michael Steffes, Jean M Bucksa, Maren L Nowicki, Carol Van Hale, Vicky Makky, Michael O'Grady, Elbert Huang, Anirban Basu, David O Meltzer, Lan Zhao, Joyce Lee, Aaron J Kowalski, Lori Laffel, William V Tamborlane, Roy W Beck, Aaron j Kowalski, Katrina J Ruedy, Ruth S Weinstock, Barbara J Anderson, Davida Kruger, Lisa La Vange, Henry Rodriguez, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch, Lori Laffel, William V Tamborlane, Bruce W Bode, Bruce Buckingham, Peter Chase, Robert Clemons, Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer, Larry A Fox, Lisa K Gilliam, Elbert S Huang, Craig Kollman, Aaron J Kowalski, Jean M Lawrence, Joyce Lee, Nelly Mauras, Michael O'Grady, Katrina J Ruedy, Michael Tansey, Eva Tsalikian, Stuart A Weinzimer, Darrell M Wilson, Howard Wolpert, Tim Wysocki, Dongyuan Xing, Irl Hirsch, Lisa K Gilliam, Kathy Fitzpatrick, Dori Khakpour, Stuart A Weinzimer, William V Tamborlane, Brett Ives, Joan Bosson-Heenan, Howard Wolpert, Greeshma Shetty, Astrid Atakov-Castillo, Judith Giusti, Stacey O'Donnell, Suzanne Ghiloni, Bruce W Bode, Kelli O'Neil, Lisa Tolbert, Tim Wysocki, Larry A Fox, Nelly Mauras, Kimberly Englert, Joe Permuy, Bruce Buckingham, Darrel M Wilson, Jennifer Block, Kari Benassi, Eva Tsalikian, Michael Tansey, Debra Kucera, Julie Coffey, Joanne Cabbage, Lori Laffel, Kerry Milaszewski, Katherine Pratt, Elise Bismuth, Joyce Keady, Margie Lawlor, Peter Chase, Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer, Paul Wadwa, Laurel Messer, Victoria Gage, Patricia Burdick, Jean M Lawrence, Robert Clemons, Michelle Maeva, Bonnie Sattler, Roy W Beck, Craig Kollman, Dongyuan Xing, Judy Jackson, Michael Steffes, Jean M Bucksa, Maren L Nowicki, Carol Van Hale, Vicky Makky, Michael O'Grady, Elbert Huang, Anirban Basu, David O Meltzer, Lan Zhao, Joyce Lee, Aaron J Kowalski, Lori Laffel, William V Tamborlane, Roy W Beck, Aaron j Kowalski, Katrina J Ruedy, Ruth S Weinstock, Barbara J Anderson, Davida Kruger, Lisa La Vange, Henry Rodriguez

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The potential benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the management of adults and children with well-controlled type 1 diabetes have not been examined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 129 adults and children with intensively treated type 1 diabetes (age range 8-69 years) and A1C <7.0% were randomly assigned to either continuous or standard glucose monitoring for 26 weeks. The main study outcomes were time with glucose level < or =70 mg/dl, A1C level, and severe hypoglycemic events. RESULTS At 26 weeks, biochemical hypoglycemia (< or =70 mg/dl) was less frequent in the CGM group than in the control group (median 54 vs. 91 min/day), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.16). Median time with a glucose level < or =60 mg/dl was 18 versus 35 min/day, respectively (P = 0.05). Time out of range (< or =70 or >180 mg/dl) was significantly lower in the CGM group than in the control group (377 vs. 491 min/day, P = 0.003). There was a significant treatment group difference favoring the CGM group in mean A1C at 26 weeks adjusted for baseline (P < 0.001). One or more severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 10 and 11% of the two groups, respectively (P = 1.0). Four outcome measures combining A1C and hypoglycemia data favored the CGM group in comparison with the control group (P < 0.001, 0.007, 0.005, and 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Most outcomes, including those combining A1C and hypoglycemia, favored the CGM group. The weight of evidence suggests that CGM is beneficial for individuals with type 1 diabetes who have already achieved excellent control with A1C <7.0%.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Combined A1C and hypoglycemia outcomes. Four outcomes are shown: A, combined outcome of A1C improved by ≥0.3% from baseline to 26 weeks and no severe hypoglycemic events; B, combined outcome of A1C improved by ≥0.3% from baseline to 26 weeks and CGM-measured hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dl) not increased from baseline to 26 weeks by ≥43 min/day (3% of the day); C, combined outcome of A1C not worse by ≥0.3% and CGM-measured hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dl) decreased from baseline to 26 weeks by ≥43 min/day (3% of the day); D, combined outcome of either B or C.

References

    1. Irvine AA, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick L: Fear of hypoglycemia: relationship to physical and psychological symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 135– 138
    1. Cryer PE: Banting Lecture: Hypoglycemia: the limiting factor in the management of IDDM. Diabetes 1994; 43: 1378– 1389
    1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1464– 1476
    1. JDRF CGM Study Group JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10: 310– 321
    1. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group Use of the DirecNet applied treatment algorithm (DATA) for diabetes management with a real-time continuous glucose monitor (the FreeStyle Navigator). Pediatr Diabetes 2008; 9: 142– 147
    1. Gibb I, Parnham A, Fonfrede M, Lecock F: Multicenter evaluation of Tosoh glycohemoglobin analyzer. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 1833– 1841
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977– 986
    1. Diabetes Research in Children Network Study Group Continuous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2007; 151: 388– 393
    1. UK Hypoglycaemia Study Group Risk of hypoglycaemia in types 1 and 2 diabetes: effects of treatment modalities and their duration. Diabetologia 2007; 50: 1140– 1147
    1. Little RJA, Rubin DB: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1987
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 1997; 46: 271– 286

Source: PubMed

3
订阅