Mechanistic Insights Into the Heterogeneity of Glucose Response Classes in Youths With Obesity: A Latent Class Trajectory Approach

Domenico Tricò, Sarah McCollum, Stephanie Samuels, Nicola Santoro, Alfonso Galderisi, Leif Groop, Sonia Caprio, Veronika Shabanova, Domenico Tricò, Sarah McCollum, Stephanie Samuels, Nicola Santoro, Alfonso Galderisi, Leif Groop, Sonia Caprio, Veronika Shabanova

Abstract

Objective: In a large, multiethnic cohort of youths with obesity, we analyzed pathophysiological and genetic mechanisms underlying variations in plasma glucose responses to a 180 min oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

Research design and methods: Latent class trajectory analysis was used to identify various glucose response profiles to a nine-point OGTT in 2,378 participants in the Yale Pathogenesis of Youth-Onset T2D study, of whom 1,190 had available TCF7L2 genotyping and 358 had multiple OGTTs over a 5 year follow-up. Insulin sensitivity, clearance, and β-cell function were estimated by glucose, insulin, and C-peptide modeling.

Results: Four latent classes (1 to 4) were identified based on increasing areas under the curve for glucose. Participants in class 3 and 4 had the worst metabolic and genetic risk profiles, featuring impaired insulin sensitivity, clearance, and β-cell function. Model-predicted probability to be classified as class 1 and 4 increased across ages, while insulin sensitivity and clearance showed transient reductions and β-cell function progressively declined. Insulin sensitivity was the strongest determinant of class assignment at enrollment and of the longitudinal change from class 1 and 2 to higher classes. Transitions between classes 3 and 4 were explained only by changes in β-cell glucose sensitivity.

Conclusions: We identified four glucose response classes in youths with obesity with different genetic risk profiles and progressive impairment in insulin kinetics and action. Insulin sensitivity was the main determinant in the transition between lower and higher glucose classes across ages. In contrast, transitions between the two worst glucose classes were driven only by β-cell glucose sensitivity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01967849.

© 2022 by the American Diabetes Association.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Observed (solid lines) and predicted (dashed lines) glucose profiles (A), plasma insulin (B), and C-peptide (C) profiles; WBISI (D), insulin secretion rate profile (E), total insulin secretion as a function of insulin sensitivity (F), and achieved plasma glucose levels (G); β-cell glucose sensitivity (H), rate sensitivity (I), and potentiation (J); total insulin clearance (K); and prevalence of the T risk allele for the common TCF7L2 variant rs7903146 (L) in the four latent classes of glucose response patterns identified. Data are mean ± SEM (AC, E, G) or median (IQR) (D, F, HL). Different letters between groups indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model-predicted cumulative probability (risk) to be assigned to each of the four identified latent glucose pattern classes across ages in the longitudinal cohort (A) and in the subgroups of participants carrying the CT/TT or CC genotype (B). Probabilities are adjusted for sex and race/ethnicity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Longitudinal changes in insulin sensitivity (WBISI) (A), insulin clearance (Clins) (B), β-cell glucose sensitivity (β-GS) (C), and β-cell rate sensitivity (β-RS) (D) across ages in males and females, adjusted for race/ethnicity and BMI. Odds ratios (95% CIs) for the transition from lower to higher latent glucose pattern classes for each 1-SD decrease in WBISI, Clins, β-GS, and β-RS adjusted for sex and race/ethnicity (E). Sqroot, square root.

References

    1. Lawrence JM, Divers J, Isom S, et al. .; SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group . Trends in prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents in the US, 2001-2017. JAMA 2021;326:717–727
    1. Viner R, White B, Christie D. Type 2 diabetes in adolescents: a severe phenotype posing major clinical challenges and public health burden. Lancet 2017;389:2252–2260
    1. Abdul-Ghani MA, Williams K, DeFronzo R, Stern M. Risk of progression to type 2 diabetes based on relationship between postload plasma glucose and fasting plasma glucose. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1613–1618
    1. Abdul-Ghani MA, Lyssenko V, Tuomi T, Defronzo RA, Groop L. The shape of plasma glucose concentration curve during OGTT predicts future risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2010;26:280–286
    1. Manco M, Nolfe G, Pataky Z, et al. . Shape of the OGTT glucose curve and risk of impaired glucose metabolism in the EGIR-RISC cohort. Metabolism 2017;70:42–50
    1. Hulman A, Vistisen D, Glümer C, Bergman M, Witte DR, Færch K. Glucose patterns during an oral glucose tolerance test and associations with future diabetes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality rate. Diabetologia 2018;61:101–107
    1. Alyass A, Almgren P, Akerlund M, et al. . Modelling of OGTT curve identifies 1 h plasma glucose level as a strong predictor of incident type 2 diabetes: results from two prospective cohorts. Diabetologia 2015;58:87–97
    1. Hulman A, Witte DR, Vistisen D, et al. . Pathophysiological characteristics underlying different glucose response curves: a latent class trajectory analysis from the prospective EGIR-RISC study. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1740–1748
    1. Tschritter O, Fritsche A, Shirkavand F, Machicao F, Häring H, Stumvoll M. Assessing the shape of the glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1026–1033
    1. Obura M, Beulens JWJ, Slieker R, et al. .; IMI-DIRECT Consortium . Post-load glucose subgroups and associated metabolic traits in individuals with type 2 diabetes: an IMI-DIRECT study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0242360.
    1. Hulman A, Simmons RK, Vistisen D, et al. . Heterogeneity in glucose response curves during an oral glucose tolerance test and associated cardiometabolic risk. Endocrine 2017;55:427–434
    1. Kim JY, Michaliszyn SF, Nasr A, et al. . The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1431–1439
    1. Olivieri F, Zusi C, Morandi A, et al. . “IGT-like” status in normoglucose tolerant obese children and adolescents: the additive role of glucose profile morphology and 2-hours glucose concentration during the oral glucose tolerance test. Int J Obes 2019;43:1363–1369
    1. La Grasta Sabolić L, Požgaj Šepec M, Cigrovski Berković M, Stipančić G. Time to the peak, shape of the curve and combination of these glucose response characteristics during oral glucose tolerance test as indicators of early beta-cell dysfunction in obese adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2021;13:160–169
    1. Nolfe G, Spreghini MR, Sforza RW, Morino G, Manco M. Beyond the morphology of the glucose curve following an oral glucose tolerance test in obese youth. Eur J Endocrinol 2012;166:107–114
    1. Galderisi A, Tricò D, Dalla Man C, et al. . Metabolic and genetic determinants of glucose shape after oral challenge in obese youths: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020;105:dgz207.
    1. Tricò D, Galderisi A, Mari A, Santoro N, Caprio S. One-hour post-load plasma glucose predicts progression to prediabetes in a multi-ethnic cohort of obese youths. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:1191–1198
    1. Tricò D, Mengozzi A, Frascerra S, Scozzaro MT, Mari A, Natali A. Intestinal glucose absorption is a key determinant of 1-hour postload plasma glucose levels in nondiabetic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;104:2131–2139
    1. Florez JC, Udler MS, Hanson RL. Chapter 14: genetics of type 2 diabetes. In Diabetes in America. 3rd ed. Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, et al., Eds. Bethesda, MD, National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disorders, 2018, 14-1–14-25
    1. Galderisi A, Tricò D, Pierpont B, et al. . A reduced incretin effect mediated by the rs7903146 variant in the TCF7L2 gene is an early marker of β-cell dysfunction in obese youth. Diabetes Care 2020;43:2553–2563
    1. Cropano C, Santoro N, Groop L, et al. . The rs7903146 variant in the TCF7L2 gene increases the risk of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes in obese adolescents by impairing β-cell function and hepatic insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1082–1089
    1. Galderisi A, Polidori D, Weiss R, et al. . Lower insulin clearance parallels a reduced insulin sensitivity in obese youths and is associated with a decline in β-cell function over time. Diabetes 2019;68:2074–2084
    1. Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child 1969;44:291–303
    1. Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Child 1970;45:13–23
    1. American Diabetes Association . 15. Diabetes advocacy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2018. Diabetes Care 2018;41(Suppl. 1):S152–S153
    1. Yeckel CW, Weiss R, Dziura J, et al. . Validation of insulin sensitivity indices from oral glucose tolerance test parameters in obese children and adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:1096–1101
    1. Van Cauter E, Mestrez F, Sturis J, Polonsky KS. Estimation of insulin secretion rates from C-peptide levels. Comparison of individual and standard kinetic parameters for C-peptide clearance. Diabetes 1992;41:368–377
    1. Mari A, Ferrannini E. Beta-cell function assessment from modelling of oral tests: an effective approach. Diabetes Obes Metab 2008;10(Suppl. 4):77–87
    1. Tricò D, Mengozzi A, Nesti L, et al. .; EGIR-RISC Study Group . Circulating palmitoleic acid is an independent determinant of insulin sensitivity, beta cell function and glucose tolerance in non-diabetic individuals: a longitudinal analysis. Diabetologia 2020;63:206–218
    1. Mengozzi A, Tricò D, Nesti L, et al. .; RISC Investigators . Disruption of fasting and post-load glucose homeostasis are largely independent and sustained by distinct and early major beta-cell function defects: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of the Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular risk (RISC) study cohort. Metabolism 2020;105:154185.
    1. Tricò D, Galderisi A, Mari A, et al. . Intrahepatic fat, irrespective of ethnicity, is associated with reduced endogenous insulin clearance and hepatic insulin resistance in obese youths: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study from the Yale Pediatric NAFLD cohort. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020;22:1628–1638
    1. Tricò D, Galderisi A, Van Name MA, et al. . A low n-6 to n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratio diet improves hyperinsulinaemia by restoring insulin clearance in obese youth. Diabetes Obes Metab 17 March 2022. DOI:10.1111/dom.14695
    1. Burgert TS, Taksali SE, Dziura J, et al. . Alanine aminotransferase levels and fatty liver in childhood obesity: associations with insulin resistance, adiponectin, and visceral fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:4287–4294
    1. Umano GR, Shabanova V, Pierpont B, et al. . A low visceral fat proportion, independent of total body fat mass, protects obese adolescent girls against fatty liver and glucose dysregulation: a longitudinal study. Int J Obes 2019;43:673–682
    1. Fishbein MH, Gardner KG, Potter CJ, Schmalbrock P, Smith MA. Introduction of fast MR imaging in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:287–293
    1. Leonetti S, Herzog RI, Caprio S, Santoro N, Tricò D. Glutamate-serine-glycine index: a novel potential biomarker in pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Children (Basel) 2020;7:E270.
    1. Tricò D, Caprio S, Rosaria Umano G, et al. . Metabolic features of nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) in obese adolescents: findings from a multiethnic cohort. Hepatology 2018;68:1376–1390
    1. Proust-Lima C, Philipps V, Liquet B. Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R package lcmm. J Stat Softw 2017;78:1–56
    1. Wardenaar KJ. Latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling using R: A tutorial for two R-packages and a comparison with Mplus. 28 January 2021 [preprint]. PsyArXiv: m58wx
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1996;49:157–176
    1. Proust-Lima C, Séne M, Taylor JM, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Joint latent class models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review. Stat Methods Med Res 2014;23:74–90
    1. Jackson CH. Multi-state models for panel data: ThemsmPackage for R. J Stat Softw 2011;38:1–28
    1. Ismail HM, Cleves MA, Xu P, et al. .; Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group . The pathological evolution of glucose response curves during the progression to type 1 diabetes in the TrialNet pathway to prevention study. Diabetes Care 2020;43:2668–2674
    1. Sam S, Edelstein SL, Arslanian SA, et al. .; RISE Consortium; RISE Consortium Investigators . Baseline predictors of glycemic worsening in youth and adults with impaired glucose tolerance or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes in the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) study. Diabetes Care 2021;44:1938–1947
    1. Goran MI, Gower BA. Longitudinal study on pubertal insulin resistance. Diabetes 2001;50:2444–2450
    1. Kelsey MM, Pyle L, Hilkin A, et al. . The impact of obesity on insulin sensitivity and secretion during pubertal progression: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020;105:dgaa043.
    1. Arslanian SA. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in children: pathophysiology and risk factors. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13(Suppl. 6):1385–1394

Source: PubMed

3
订阅