Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox
Nicolaas Prins, Frederick A A Kingdom, Nicolaas Prins, Frederick A A Kingdom
Abstract
In the social sciences it is common practice to test specific theoretically motivated research hypotheses using formal statistical procedures. Typically, students in these disciplines are trained in such methods starting at an early stage in their academic tenure. On the other hand, in psychophysical research, where parameter estimates are generally obtained using a maximum-likelihood (ML) criterion and data do not lend themselves well to the least-squares methods taught in introductory courses, it is relatively uncommon to see formal model comparisons performed. Rather, it is common practice to estimate the parameters of interest (e.g., detection thresholds) and their standard errors individually across the different experimental conditions and to 'eyeball' whether the observed pattern of parameter estimates supports or contradicts some proposed hypothesis. We believe that this is at least in part due to a lack of training in the proper methodology as well as a lack of available software to perform such model comparisons when ML estimators are used. We introduce here a relatively new toolbox of Matlab routines called Palamedes which allows users to perform sophisticated model comparisons. In Palamedes, we implement the model-comparison approach to hypothesis testing. This approach allows researchers considerable flexibility in targeting specific research hypotheses. We discuss in a non-technical manner how this method can be used to perform statistical model comparisons when ML estimators are used. With Palamedes we hope to make sophisticated statistical model comparisons available to researchers who may not have the statistical background or the programming skills to perform such model comparisons from scratch. Note that while Palamedes is specifically geared toward psychophysical data, the core ideas behind the model-comparison approach that our paper discusses generalize to any field in which statistical hypotheses are tested.
Keywords: model comparisons; psychometrics; psychophysics; software; statistics.
Figures
References
- Akaike H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model indemnification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 19 716–723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
- Baguley T. S. (2012). Serious Stats: A Guide to Advanced Statistics for the Behavioral Statistics. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan; 10.1007/978-0-230-36355-7
- Cohen J. (1994). The earth is round (p < 0.05). Am. Psychol. 49 997–1003. 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
- Efron B., Tibshirani R. J. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- García-Pérez M. A. (1998). Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties. Vision Res. 38 1861–1881. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00340-4
- Gelman A. (2013). P values and statistical practice. Epidemiology 24 69–72. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31827886f7
- Hayes W. L. (1994). Statistics. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.
- Hoel P. G., Port S. C., Stone C. J. (1971). Introduction to Statistical Theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Ioannidis J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2:e124. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
- Jaynes E. T., Bretthorst G. L. (2003). Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 10.1017/CBO9780511790423
- Judd C. M., McClelland G. H. (1989). Data Analysis: A Model Comparison Approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
- Judd C. M., McClelland G. H., Ryan C. S. (2008). Data Analysis: A Model Comparison Approach, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Kingdom F. A. A., Baldwin A. S., Schmidtmann G. (2015). Modelling probability and additive summation for detection across multiple mechanisms under the assumptions of signal detection theory. J. Vis. 15:1. 10.1167/15.5.1
- Kingdom F. A. A., Prins N. (2016). Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction, 2nd Edn. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
- Kline R. B. (2004). Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. (Washington, DC: APA Books; ). 10.1037/10693-000
- Knoblauch K. (2014). psyphy: Functions for Analyzing Psychophysical Data in R. Available at:
- Knoblauch K., Maloney L. T. (2012). Modeling Psychophysical Data in R. New York, NY: Springer; 10.1007/978-1-4614-4475-6
- Kruschke J. K. (2014). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
- Kontsevich L. L., Tyler C. W. (1999). Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Res. 39 2729–2737. 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00285-5
- Linares D., López-Moliner J. (2016). quickpsy: an R package to fit psychometric functions for multiple groups. R J. 8 122–131.
- Maloney L. T., Yang J. N. (2003). Maximum likelihood difference scaling. J. Vis. 3 573–585. 10.1167/3.8.5
- Pentland A. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation: the best PEST. Percept. Psychophys. 28 377–379. 10.3758/BF03204398
- Prins N. (2008a). Correspondence matching in long-range apparent motion precedes featural analysis. Perception 37 1022–1036.
- Prins N. (2008b). Texture modulation detection by probability summation among orientation-selective, and isotropic mechanisms. Vision Res. 48 2751–2766. 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.005
- Prins N. (2012). The psychometric function: the lapse rate revisited. J. Vis. 12:25. 10.1167/12.6.25
- Prins N. (2013). The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less). J. Vis. 13:3. 10.1167/13.7.3
- Rolfs M., Murray-Smith N., Carrasco M. (2018). Perceptual Learning while preparing saccades. Vision Res. (in press). 10.1016/j.visres.2017.11.009
- Schütt H. H., Harmeling S., Macke J. H., Wichmann F. A. (2016). Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data. Vision Res. 122 105–123. 10.1016/j.visres.2016.02.002
- Trafimow D., Marks M. (2015). Editorial. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 37 1–2. 10.1080/01973533.2015.1012991
- van Driel J., Knapen T., van Es D. M., Cohen M. X. (2014). Interregional alpha-band synchrony supports temporal cross-modal integration. Neuroimage 101 404–415. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.022
- Watson A. B., Pelli D. G. (1983). Quest: a bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept. Psychophys. 33 113–120. 10.3758/BF03202828
Source: PubMed