Intraoperative pectoral nerve block (Pec) for breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Mary Thomas, Frenny A Philip, Arun P Mathew, K M Jagathnath Krishna, Mary Thomas, Frenny A Philip, Arun P Mathew, K M Jagathnath Krishna

Abstract

Background and aims: In centers with high turnover of breast surgeries, pectoral nerve block (Pec II) is time-consuming and requires ultrasound familiarity for administration. We decided to block the same nerves under vision after resection to evaluate postoperative analgesic effects.

Material and methods: Sixty patients scheduled for modified radical mastectomy were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blinded study. All patients received standardized general anesthesia. After surgical resection, infiltration of either ropivacaine (Group A) or saline (Group B) was given under vision at two points: 20 ml in the fascia over serratus anterior and 10 ml in the fascia between pectoralis major and minor at the level of the third rib. The primary outcomes measured were the time to first request for analgesia after extubation and total dose of analgesics needed, and secondary outcome included pain scores using the Numerical Rating Scale over 24 h. Analgesics used postoperatively were fentanyl citrate and paracetamol. We used Student's t-test to analyze quantity of analgesics needed, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test for time to first request of analgesic, and Fisher's exact test for pain scores.

Results: No patient in Group A required fentanyl. The mean time to first request for analgesia and mean dose of paracetamol required was 353.93 ± 135.03 min and 2.71 ± 0.462.71 g in Group A and 27.17 ± 18.08 min and 3.53 ± 1.074 g in Group B [P = 0.002]. Significantly more patients in Group A had mild pain scores compared to Group B.

Conclusion: Pec II block with ropivacaine delivered under vision reduced analgesic requirement and pain scores significantly.

Keywords: Breast neoplasm; modified radical mastectomy; nerve block; postoperative pain; ropivacaine.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Injection between Pectoralis Major and Pectoralis Minor
Figure 2
Figure 2
Injection between Pectoralis Minor and fascia over Serratus Anterior

References

    1. Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): A novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012;59:470–5.
    1. Divatia JV, Ambulkar R. Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: What is the evidence? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014;30:147–50.
    1. Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1993;55:195–203.
    1. Syal K, Chandel A. Comparison of the post-operative analgesic effect of paravertebral block, pectoral nerve block and local infiltration in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomised double-blind trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:643–8.
    1. O’Scanaill P, Keane SP, Wall V, Flood G, Buggy DJ. Single-shot pectoral plane (PECs I and PECs II) blocks versus continuous local anaesthetic infusion analgesia or both after non-ambulatory breast-cancer surgery: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Br J Anaesth. 120:846–53.
    1. Bakshi SG, Karan N, Parmar V. Pectoralis block for breast surgery: A surgical concern.? Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:851–2.
    1. Bashandy GM, Abbas DN. Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:68–74.
    1. Chanrachakul B, Likittanasombut P, Prasertsawat P, Herabutya Y. Lidocaine versus plain saline for pain relief in fractional curettage: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:592–5.
    1. Lin X, Wang YJ, Li Q, Hou YY, Hong MH, Cao YL, et al. Chronic high-dose morphine treatment promotes SH-SY5Y cell apoptosis via c-Jun N-terminal kinase mediated activation of mitochondria-dependent pathway. FEBS J. 2009;276:2022–36.
    1. Kuthiala G, Chaudhary G. Ropivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and clinical use. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:104–10.
    1. Selander D, Sjovall J, Waldenlind L. Accidental i.v injections of ropivacaine: Clinical experience of six cases. Reg Anaesth. 1997;22:70.
    1. Lucchinetti E, Awad AE, Rahman M, Feng J, Lou PH, Zhang L, et al. Antiproliferative effects of local anesthetics on mesenchymal stem cells: Potential implications for tumor spreading and wound healing. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:841–56.
    1. Lirk P, Berger R, Hollmann MW, Fiegl H. Lidocaine time- and dose dependently demethylates deoxyribonucleic acid in breast cancer cell lines in vitro . Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:200–7.
    1. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Zeitz ID, Gray AT. Inadvertent femoral nerve impalement and intraneural injection visualized by ultrasound. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:627–8.
    1. Russon K, Blanco R. Accidental intraneural injection into the musculocutaneous nerve visualized with ultrasound. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1504–5.
    1. Loubert C, Williams SR, Hélie F, Arcand G. Complication during ultrasound-guided regional block: Accidental intravascular injection of local anesthetic. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:759–60.
    1. Ueshima H, Otake H. Addition of transversus thoracic muscle plane block to pectoral nerves block provides more effective perioperative pain relief than pectoral nerves block alone for breast cancer surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:439–43.
    1. Wijayasinghe N, Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Analgesic and sensory effects of the Pecs local anesthetic block in patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: A pilot study. Pain Pract. 2017;17:185–91.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅