Content and frequency of writing on diabetes bulletin boards: does race make a difference?

Siobhan Case, Valarie Jernigan, Audra Gardner, Philip Ritter, Catherine A Heaney, Kate R Lorig, Siobhan Case, Valarie Jernigan, Audra Gardner, Philip Ritter, Catherine A Heaney, Kate R Lorig

Abstract

Background: Diabetes-related disparities are well documented among racial minority groups in the United States. Online programs hold great potential for reducing these disparities. However, little is known about how people of different races utilize and communicate in such groups. This type of research is necessary to ensure that online programs respond to the needs of diverse populations.

Objective: This exploratory study investigated message frequency and content on bulletin boards by race in the Internet Diabetes Self-Management Program (IDSMP). Two questions were asked: (1) Do participants of different races utilize bulletin boards with different frequency? (2) Do message, content, and communication style differ by race? If so, how?

Methods: Subjects were drawn by purposeful sampling from participants in an ongoing study of the effectiveness of the IDSMP. All subjects had completed a 6-week intervention that included the opportunity to use four diabetes-specific bulletin boards. The sample (N = 45) consisted of three groups of 15 participants, each who self-identified as American Indian or Alaskan Native (AI/AN), African American (AA), or Caucasian, and was stratified by gender, age, and education. Utilization was assessed by counting the number of messages per participant and the range of days of participation. Messages were coded blindly for message type, content, and communication style. Data were analyzed using descriptive and nonparametric statistics.

Results: In assessing board utilization, AAs wrote fewer overall messages (P = .02) and AIs/ANs wrote fewer action planning posts (P = .05) compared with Caucasians. AIs/ANs logged in to the program for a shorter time period than Caucasians (P = .04). For message content, there were no statistical (P <or= .05) differences among groups in message type. No differences were found in message content between AAs and Caucasians, but AIs/ANs differed in content from both other groups. Caucasians wrote more on food behaviors than AIs/ANs (P = .01), and AIs/ANs wrote more about physical activity than Caucasians (P = .05) and about walking than the other two groups (P = .01). There were no differences in communication style.

Conclusions: Although Caucasians utilized the boards more than the other two groups, there were few differences in message type, content, or style. Since participation in bulletin boards is largely blind to race, age, gender, and other characteristics, it is not clear if finding few differences was due to this optional anonymity or because non-Caucasian participants assumed that they were communicating with Caucasians. If the low variability between racial groups indicates that the IDSMP is flexible enough to meet the needs of multiple racial groups, then online programs may be an accessible and effective tool to reduce health disparities. These questions need to be investigated in future studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00185601 NCT00372463.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, authors. Fact Sheet: Diabetes Disparities Among Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001. .
    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, authors. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates on Diabetes. 2005 .
    1. Crombie IK, Irvine L, Elliott L, Wallace H. Closing the Health Inequalities Gap: An International Perspective. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2005. .
    1. Institute of Medicine, authors. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2001. .
    1. Caballero AE. Cultural competence in diabetes mellitus care: An urgent need. Insulin. 2007 Apr;2(2):80–91. doi: 10.1016/S1557-0843(07)80019-4.
    1. Blanchard MA, Rose LE, Taylor J, McEntee MA, Latchaw LL. Using a focus group to design a diabetes education program for an African American population. Diabetes Educ. 1999 Nov-Dec;25(6):917–924. doi: 10.1177/014572179902500609.
    1. D'Eramo-Melkus Gail, Spollett Geralyn, Jefferson Vanessa, Chyun Deborah, Tuohy Beth, Robinson Tanisha, Kaisen Anne. A culturally competent intervention of education and care for black women with type 2 diabetes. Appl Nurs Res. 2004 Feb;17(1):10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2003.10.009.S0897189703001083
    1. Devlin Heather, Roberts Martha, Okaya Amy, Xiong Yer Moua. Our lives were healthier before: focus groups with African American, American Indian, Hispanic/Latino, and Hmong people with diabetes. Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jan;7(1):47–55. doi: 10.1177/1524839905275395.7/1/47
    1. Egede Leonard E, Bonadonna Ramita J. Diabetes self-management in African Americans: an exploration of the role of fatalism. Diabetes Educ. 2003 Jan-Feb;29(1):105–115. doi: 10.1177/014572170302900115.
    1. Samuel-Hodge CD, Headen SW, Skelly AH, Ingram AF, Keyserling TC, Jackson EJ, Ammerman AS, Elasy TA. Influences on day-to-day self-management of type 2 diabetes among African-American women: spirituality, the multi-caregiver role, and other social context factors. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):928–933. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.928.
    1. Satterfield Dawn W, Lofton Teresa, May Jeannette E, Bowman Barbara A, Alfaro-Correa Ana, Benjamin Christopher, Stankus Melissa. Learning from listening: common concerns and perceptions about diabetes prevention among diverse American populations. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003 Nov;Suppl:S56–63.
    1. Skelly Anne H, Dougherty Molly, Gesler Wilbert M, Soward April C, Burns Dorothy, Arcury Thomas A. African American beliefs about diabetes. West J Nurs Res. 2006 Feb;28(1):9–29. doi: 10.1177/0193945905280298..
    1. Taylor Christopher, Keim Kathryn S, Sparrer Alicia, Van Delinder Jean, Parker Stephany. Social and cultural barriers to diabetes prevention in Oklahoma American Indian women. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Mar 15;1(2) A06
    1. Taylor Christopher A, Keim Kathryn S, Fuqua Dale R, Johnson Christine A. A diabetes prevention assessment tool for American Indians. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Sep 15;2(4) A06
    1. Cox RH, Carpenter JP, Bruce FA, Poole KP, Gaylord CK. Characteristics of low-income African-American and Caucasian adults that are important in self-management of type 2 diabetes. J Community Health. 2004 Apr;29(2):155–270. doi: 10.1023/B:JOHE.0000016719.89848.b1.
    1. Jackson Chandra L, Bolen Shari, Brancati Frederick L, Batts-Turner Marian L, Gary Tiffany L. A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care; Interactive information technology in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):105–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00310.x.JGI310
    1. McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, Hawkins RP, Pingree S, Wise M, Taylor JO, Apantaku FM. CHESS (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System): an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. J Ambul Care Manage. 1995 Jul;18(3):35–41.
    1. White M, Dorman SM. Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Educ Res. 2001 Dec;16(6):693–707. doi: 10.1093/her/16.6.693.
    1. Barrera Manuel, Glasgow Russell E, McKay H Garth, Boles Shawn M, Feil Edward G. Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support? An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management. Am J Community Psychol. 2002 Oct;30(5):637–654. doi: 10.1023/A:1016369114780.
    1. McKay HG, Feil EG, Glasgow RE, Brown JE. Feasibility and use of an Internet support service for diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educ. 1998 Mar-Apr;24(2):174–179. doi: 10.1177/014572179802400207.
    1. Madara EJ. The mutual-aid self-help online revolution. Soc Policy. 1997;27(3):20–26.
    1. Salem DA, Bogat AG, Reid C. Mutual help goes on-line. J Community Psychol. 1997;25(2):189–207. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199703)25:2<189::AID-JCOP7>;2-T.
    1. Horrigan JB. Home broadband adoption 2008. Washington, DC: PEW Internet & American Life Project; 2008. .
    1. Fox S. Online health search 2006: summary of findings. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2006. .
    1. Fox S. E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2007. .
    1. Fox S. Digital divisions. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2005. .
    1. Jackson Chandra L, Batts-Turner Marian L, Falb Matthew D, Yeh Hsin-Chieh, Brancati Frederick L, Gary Tiffany L. Computer and internet use among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. J Urban Health. 2005 Dec;82(4):575–583. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti126.jti126
    1. Owens BH, Robbins KC. CHESS: comprehensive health enhancement support system for women with breast cancer. Plast Surg Nurs. 1996;16(3):172-175–182.
    1. Gustafson D, Wise M, McTavish F, Taylor JO, Wolberg W, Stewart J, Smalley R, Bosworth K. Development and pilot evaluation of a computer-based support system for women with breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1993;11(4):69–93. doi: 10.1300/J077V11N04_05..
    1. Coulson Neil S. Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005 Dec;8(6):580–584. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.580.
    1. Winefield Helen R. Support provision and emotional work in an Internet support group for cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Aug;62(2):193–197. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.002.S0738-3991(05)00203-X
    1. Coulson Neil S, Buchanan Heather, Aubeeluck Aimee. Social support in cyberspace: a content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002.S0738-3991(07)00226-1
    1. Mo Phoenix K H, Coulson Neil S. Exploring the communication of social support within virtual communities: a content analysis of messages posted to an online HIV/AIDS support group. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Jun;11(3):371–374. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0118.
    1. Gooden Rebecca J, Winefield Helen R. Breast and prostate cancer online discussion boards: a thematic analysis of gender differences and similarities. J Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;12(1):103–114. doi: 10.1177/1359105307071744.12/1/103
    1. Ginossar Tamar. Online participation: a content analysis of differences in utilization of two online cancer communities by men and women, patients and family members. Health Commun. 2008;23(1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/10410230701697100.790637757
    1. Jernigan VJ. The Native American Diabetes Self-Management Program [dissertation] Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley; 2007.
    1. Shuyler Kristen S, Knight Kristin M. What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Oct 10;5(4):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e24.
    1. Hoffman-Goetz L, Donelle L. Chat room computer-mediated support on health issues for aboriginal women. Health Care Women Int. 2007 Apr;28(4):397–418. doi: 10.1080/07399330601180057.773372045
    1. Ravert Russell D, Hancock Mary D, Ingersoll Gary M. Online forum messages posted by adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):827–834. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000518.
    1. Lasker Judith N, Sogolow Ellen D, Sharim Rebecca R. The role of an online community for people with a rare disease: content analysis of messages posted on a primary biliary cirrhosis mailinglist. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar;7(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e10. v7e10
    1. Burri Mafalda, Baujard Vincent, Etter Jean-François. A qualitative analysis of an internet discussion forum for recent ex-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1(Suppl):S13–S19. doi: 10.1080/14622200601042513.
    1. Fogel Joshua, Albert Steven M, Schnabel Freya, Ditkoff Beth Ann, Neugut Alfred I. Racial/ethnic differences and potential psychological benefits in use of the internet by women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2003 Mar;12(2):107–117. doi: 10.1002/pon.617.
    1. Lorig Kate R, Ritter Philip L, Laurent Diana D, Plant Kathryn. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):964–971. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233678.80203.c1.00005650-200611000-00002
    1. Lofland J. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1971.
    1. Hara N, Bonk CJ, Angeli C. Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instr Sci. 28(2):115–152. doi: 10.1023/A:1003764722829..
    1. Heaney CA, Israel BA. Karen G, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1999. Social networks and social support; pp. 179–205.
    1. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
    1. Zrebiec JF, Jacobson AM. What attracts patients with diabetes to an internet support group? A 21-month longitudinal website study. Diabet Med. 2001 Feb;18(2):154–158. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00443.x.dme443

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅