Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients: development and pilot study of an intervention in primary care (the OPTI-SCRIPT study)

Barbara Clyne, Marie C Bradley, Carmel M Hughes, Daniel Clear, Ronan McDonnell, David Williams, Tom Fahey, Susan M Smith, OPTI-SCRIPT study team, Barbara Clyne, Marie C Bradley, Carmel M Hughes, Daniel Clear, Ronan McDonnell, David Williams, Tom Fahey, Susan M Smith, OPTI-SCRIPT study team

Abstract

Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older people is common in primary care and can result in increased morbidity, adverse drug events, hospitalizations and mortality. The prevalence of PIP in Ireland is estimated at 36% with an associated expenditure of over €45 million in 2007. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework to the development of an intervention to decrease PIP in Irish primary care.

Methods: The MRC framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions guided the development of the study intervention. In the development stage, literature was reviewed and combined with information obtained from experts in the field using a consensus based methodology and patient cases to define the main components of the intervention. In the pilot stage, five GPs tested the proposed intervention. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the GPs to inform the development and implementation of the intervention for the main randomised controlled trial.

Results: The literature review identified PIP criteria for inclusion in the study and two initial intervention components - academic detailing and medicines review supported by therapeutic treatment algorithms. Through patient case studies and a focus group with a group of 8 GPs, these components were refined and a third component of the intervention identified - patient information leaflets. The intervention was tested in a pilot study. In total, eight medicine reviews were conducted across five GP practices. These reviews addressed ten instances of PIP, nine of which were addressed in the form of either a dose reduction or a discontinuation of a targeted medication. Qualitative interviews highlighted that GPs were receptive to the intervention but patient preference and time needed both to prepare for and conduct the medicines review, emerged as potential barriers. Findings from the pilot study allowed further refinement to produce the finalised intervention of academic detailing with a pharmacist, medicines review with web-based therapeutic treatment algorithms and tailored patient information leaflets.

Conclusions: The MRC framework was used in the development of the OPTI-SCRIPT intervention to decrease the level of PIP in primary care in Ireland. Its application ensured that the intervention was developed using the best available evidence, was acceptable to GPs and feasible to deliver in the clinical setting. The effectiveness of this intervention is currently being tested in a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Trial registration: Current controlled trials ISRCTN41694007.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of intervention development adapted from MRC framework. Abbreviations – PIP (Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing); RCT (Randomised Controlled Trial).
Figure 2
Figure 2
PIP criteria review process. Abbreviations – BNF (British National Formulary); IMF (Irish Medicines Formulary).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of patient information leaflet.

References

    1. Gallagher P, Barry P, O’Mahony D. Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:113–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2007.00793.x.
    1. Spinewine A, Schmader K, Barber N, Hughes C, Lapane K, Swine C, Hanlon J. Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised? Lancet. 2007;370:173–184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61091-5.
    1. Jano E, Aparasu RR. Healthcare Outcomes Associated with Beers’ Criteria: A Systematic Review. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:438–447. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H473.
    1. Hamilton H, Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, O’Mahony D. Potentially Inappropriate Medications Defined by STOPP Criteria and the Risk of Adverse Drug Events in Older Hospitalized Patients. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1013–1019. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.215.
    1. Cahir C, Fahey T, Teeling M, Teljeur C, Feely J, Bennett K. Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a national population study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69:543–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03628.x.
    1. Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing. 2008;37:673–679. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn197.
    1. Gallagher P, Lang P, Cherubini A, Topinková E, Cruz-Jentoft A, Montero Errasquín B, Mádlová P, Gasperini B, Baeyens H, Baeyens J-P, Michel J-P, O‘Mahony D. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in an acutely ill population of older patients admitted to six European hospitals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67:1175–1188. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1061-0.
    1. Byrne S, OMahony D, Hughes CM, Parsons C, PS M, McCormack B, Finn F. An evaluation of the inappropriate prescribing in older residents in long term care in the greater Cork and Northern Ireland regions using the STOPP and Beers criteria. Dublin: Centre for ageing research and development in Ireland (CARDI); 2011.
    1. Marcum ZA, Handler SM, Wright R, Hanlon JT. Interventions to improve suboptimal prescribing in nursing homes: A narrative review. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8:183–200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2010.05.004.
    1. Kaur S, Mitchell G, Vitetta L, Roberts MS. Interventions that can reduce inappropriate prescribing in the elderly: a systematic review. Drugs Aging. 2009;26:1013–1028. doi: 10.2165/11318890-000000000-00000.
    1. Loganathan M, Singh S, Franklin BD, Bottle A, Majeed A. Interventions to optimise prescribing in care homes: systematic review. Age Ageing. 2011;40:150–162. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq161.
    1. Majumdar SR, Soumerai SB. Why most interventions to improve physician prescribing do not seem to work. CMAJ. 2003;169:30–31.
    1. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O‘Brien MA. Changing Provider Behavior: An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Med Care. 2001;39:II2–II45.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;3:37.
    1. Medical Research Council. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council; 2000.
    1. Forsetlund L, Eike M, Gjerberg E, Vist G. Effect of interventions to reduce potentially inappropriate use of drugs in nursing homes: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-16.
    1. Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, Guthrie B, Lester H, Wilson P, Kinmonth AL. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ. 2007;334:455–459. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Clyne B, Bradley MC, Smith SM, Hughes CM, Motterlini N, Clear D, McDonnell R, Williams D, Fahey T. Effectiveness of medicines review with web-based pharmaceutical treatment algorithms in reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people in primary care: a cluster randomized trial (OPTI-SCRIPT study protocol) Trials. 2013;14:72. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-72.
    1. Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsey CR, Eccles MP, Grimshaw J. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3 CD001096.
    1. Ostini R, Hegney D, Jackson C, Williamson M, Mackson JM, Gurman K, Hall W, Tett SE. Systematic Review of Interventions to Improve Prescribing. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:502–513. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L488.
    1. O‘ Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, Oxman AD, Odgaard-Jensen J, Kristofferson DT, Forsetlund L, Bainbridge D, Freemantle N, Davis DA, Haynes RB, Harvey EL. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane database syst rev. 2007;4:CD000409.
    1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young J, Odgaard-Jensen J, French S, O‘ Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.
    1. Castelino RL, Bajorek BV, Chen TF. Targeting suboptimal prescribing in the elderly: a review of the impact of pharmacy services. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:1096–1106. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L700.
    1. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.002.
    1. Bhattacharyya O, Reeves S, Garfinkel S, Zwarenstein M. Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions: Fine in theory, but evidence of effectiveness in practice is needed. Implement Sci. 2006;1:5. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-5.
    1. Oxman AD, Fretheim A, Flottorp S. The OFF theory of research utilization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:113–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.002.
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Eccles MP, Francis J, Hardeman W, Johnston M. Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-10.
    1. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning: an educational and ecological approach 3rd edn. Mountain View, CA: Mogfield; 1999.
    1. Ramaswamy R, Maio V, Diamond JJ, Talati AR, Hartmann CW, Arenson C, Roehl B. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in elderly: assessing doctor knowledge, confidence and barriers. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:1153–1159. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01494.x.
    1. Alldred DP, Raynor DK, Hughes C, Barber N, Chen TF, Spoor P. Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2 CD009095.
    1. Garcia RM. Five ways you can reduce inappropriate prescribing in the elderly: A systematic review. J Fam Prac. 2006;55:305–312.
    1. Krska J, Gill D, Hansford D. Pharmacist-supported medication review training for general practitioners: feasibility and acceptability. Med Educ. 2006;40:1217–1225. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02633.x.
    1. Drenth-van Maanen AC, Van Marum RJ, Knol W, van der Linden CM, Jansen PA. Prescribing optimization method for improving prescribing in elderly patients receiving polypharmacy: results of application to case histories by general practitioners. Drugs Aging. 2009;26:687–701. doi: 10.2165/11316400-000000000-00000.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions, new guidance. London: Medical Research Council; 2008.
    1. Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3496.
    1. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, Waller JL, Maclean JR, Beers MH. Updating the Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults: Results of a US Consensus Panel of Experts. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2716–2724. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.22.2716.
    1. Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Kennedy J, O‘Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46:72–83.
    1. McLeod PJ, Huang AR, Tamblyn RM, Gayton DC. Defining inappropriate practices in prescribing for elderly people: a national consensus panel. CMAJ. 1997;156:385–391.
    1. Naugler CT, Brymer C, Stolee P, Arcese ZA. Development and validation of an improving prescribing in the elderly tool. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;7:103–107.
    1. Wenger NS, Roth CP, Shekelle P. the AI. Introduction to the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders-3 Quality Indicator Measurement Set. JAGS. 2007;55:S247–S252. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01328.x.
    1. Straand J, Fetveit A, Rognstad S, Gjelstad S, Brekke M, Dalen I. A cluster-randomized educational intervention to reduce inappropriate prescription patterns for elderly patients in general practice - The Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:72. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-72.
    1. Kenny T, Wilson RG, Purves IN, Clark J, Newton LD, Newton DP, Moseley DV. A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Fam Pract. 1998;15:471–479. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.5.471.
    1. Feely J, Chan R, McManus J, O’Shea B. The influence of hospital-based prescribers on prescribing in general practice. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;16:175–181. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00006.
    1. Page M, French S, McKenzie J, O’Connor D, Green S. Recruitment difficulties in a primary care cluster randomised trial: investigating factors contributing to general practitioners’ recruitment of patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-35.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅