Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating the Ophthalmic Safety of Single-Dose Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers

Jessica Ackert, Khadeeja Mohamed, Jason S Slakter, Sherif El-Harazi, Alessandro Berni, Hakop Gevorkyan, Elizabeth Hardaker, Azra Hussaini, Siôn W Jones, Gavin C K W Koh, Jyoti Patel, Scott Rasmussen, Deborah S Kelly, David E Barañano, John T Thompson, Keith A Warren, Robert C Sergott, John Tonkyn, Allen Wolstenholme, Hanna Coleman, Alex Yuan, Stephan Duparc, Justin A Green, Jessica Ackert, Khadeeja Mohamed, Jason S Slakter, Sherif El-Harazi, Alessandro Berni, Hakop Gevorkyan, Elizabeth Hardaker, Azra Hussaini, Siôn W Jones, Gavin C K W Koh, Jyoti Patel, Scott Rasmussen, Deborah S Kelly, David E Barañano, John T Thompson, Keith A Warren, Robert C Sergott, John Tonkyn, Allen Wolstenholme, Hanna Coleman, Alex Yuan, Stephan Duparc, Justin A Green

Abstract

Introduction: Tafenoquine has been recently registered for the prevention of relapse in Plasmodium vivax malaria.

Objective: This study assessed the pharmacodynamic effects of 300-mg single-dose tafenoquine on the retina.

Methods: This phase I, prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted between 2 February 2016 and 14 September 2017 at three US study centers. Adult healthy volunteers were randomized (2:1) to receive either a single 300-mg oral dose of tafenoquine or matched placebo on day 1. Ophthalmic assessments, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF), were conducted at baseline and day 90 and evaluated for pre-determined endpoints by an independent, masked reading center.

Results: One subject in each group met the composite primary endpoint for retinal changes identified with SD-OCT or FAF, i.e., one out of 306 (0.3%) with tafenoquine, one out of 161 (0.6%) with placebo. Both cases had unilateral focal ellipsoid zone disruption at day 90 with no effect on best-corrected visual acuity. The tafenoquine-treated subject had this abnormality at baseline, and was enrolled in error. There was no difference in ophthalmic safety between tafenoquine and placebo.

Conclusion: There was no evidence of any pharmacodynamic effect of 300-mg single-dose tafenoquine on the retina or any short-term clinically relevant effects on ophthalmic safety. This clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02658435).

Conflict of interest statement

Jessica Ackert, Khadeeja Mohamed, Alessandro Berni, Elizabeth Hardaker, Siôn W. Jones, Gavin C.K.W Koh, Jyoti Patel, John Tonkyn, Allen Wolstenholme, and Justin A. Green are employees of GlaxoSmithKline and hold shares in the company. Jason S. Slakter, Hakop Gevorkyan, Hanna Coleman, and Alex Yuan are employees of DARC. Hakop Gevorkyan is an employee of California Clinical Trials Medical Group, and Azra Hussaini is an employee of PAREXEL (California Clinical Trials Medical Group in association with PAREXEL International were contracted and reimbursed for conducting this study). Sherif El-Harazi is an employee of the Lugene Eye Institute; Scott Rasmussen and Keith A. Warren are employees of IQVIA; Deborah S. Kelly is a former employee of GSK and a current employee of Spark Therapeutics; David E. Barañano, John T. Thompson, and Robert C. Sergott received research funding for participating in this study, but have no other relevant conflicts. Robert C. Sergott is an employee of the Wills Eye Hospital. Stephan Duparc is an employee of Medicines for Malaria Venture.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study schematic
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Subject disposition
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images in the two subjects meeting the primary endpoint for retinal changes who received a 300-mg single-dose tafenoquine (note that the subject had this abnormality at baseline and was enrolled in error) or b placebo
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images in the two subjects meeting the primary endpoint for retinal changes who received a 300-mg single-dose tafenoquine (note that the subject had this abnormality at baseline and was enrolled in error) or b placebo
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in baseline for best-corrected visual acuity versus optical coherence tomography parameters. No subjects had subretinal fluid thickness. Excludes the central subfield thickness results of subjects with imputed change from baseline and one tafenoquine (TQ) subject that had a missing baseline value (4 placebo; 4 TQ)

References

    1. Lacerda M, Llanos-Cuentas A, Krudsood S, Lon C, Saunders D, Mohammed R, et al. Single-dose tafenoquine to prevent relapse of Plasmodium vivax malaria. N Engl J Med. 2018;380(3):215–228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710775.
    1. Llanos-Cuentas A, Lacerda M, Tinh Hien T, Vélez I, Namaik-larp C, Chu C, et al. Tafenoquine versus primaquine to prevent relapse of Plasmodium vivax malaria. N Engl J Med. 2018;380(3):229–241. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802537.
    1. Llanos-Cuentas A, Lacerda MV, Rueangweerayut R, Krudsood S, Gupta SK, Kochar SK, et al. Tafenoquine plus chloroquine for the treatment and relapse prevention of Plasmodium vivax malaria (DETECTIVE): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 2b dose-selection study. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1049–1058. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62568-4.
    1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. WHO, Geneva. 2018. . Accessed 22 Nov 2018.
    1. Adams JH, Mueller I. The biology of Plasmodium vivax. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7(9):a025585. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025585.
    1. World Health Organization. Strategy for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion (2015-2030). World Health Organization, Geneva. 2015. . Accessed 27 Feb 2019.
    1. Galappaththy GN, Tharyan P, Kirubakaran R. Primaquine for preventing relapse in people with Plasmodium vivax malaria treated with chloroquine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(10):CD004389.
    1. Marmor MF, Kellner U, Lai TY, Melles RB, Mieler WF, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Recommendations on screening for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine retinopathy (2016 revision). Ophthalmology. 2016;123(6):1386–94.
    1. Nasveld PE, Edstein MD, Reid M, Brennan L, Harris IE, Kitchener SJ, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tafenoquine versus mefloquine for malaria prophylaxis in nonimmune subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(2):792–798. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00354-09.
    1. Warrasak S, Euswas A, Fukuda M, Ittiverakul M, Miller R, Krudsood S et al. Comparative ophthalmic assessment of patients receiving tafenoquine or chloroquine/primaquine in a randomized clinical trial for Plasmodium vivax malaria radical cure. Int Ophthalmol. 2018; (E-publication ahead of print). 10.1007/s10792-018-1003-2.
    1. Kochar A, Kalra P, Sb V, Ukirade V, Chahar A, Kochar DK, et al. Retinopathy of vivax malaria in adults and its relation with severity parameters. Pathog Glob Health. 2016;110(4–5):185–193. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2016.1213948.
    1. GlaxoSmithKline. KRINTAFEL (tafenoquine) tablets, for oral use. GSK, Research Triangle Park. 2018. . Accessed 28 Oct 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅