Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial

Angelo Di Leo, Guy Jerusalem, Lubos Petruzelka, Roberto Torres, Igor N Bondarenko, Rustem Khasanov, Didier Verhoeven, José L Pedrini, Iya Smirnova, Mikhail R Lichinitser, Kelly Pendergrass, Luca Malorni, Sally Garnett, Yuri Rukazenkov, Miguel Martin, Angelo Di Leo, Guy Jerusalem, Lubos Petruzelka, Roberto Torres, Igor N Bondarenko, Rustem Khasanov, Didier Verhoeven, José L Pedrini, Iya Smirnova, Mikhail R Lichinitser, Kelly Pendergrass, Luca Malorni, Sally Garnett, Yuri Rukazenkov, Miguel Martin

Abstract

Background: At the time of the initial analysis of overall survival (OS) for the Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, approximately 50% of patients had died. A final analysis of OS was subsequently planned for when 75% of patients had died.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to fulvestrant 500 mg administered as two 5-mL intramuscular injections on days 0, 14, and 28 and every 28 (±3) days thereafter or fulvestrant 250 mg administered as two 5-mL intramuscular injections (one fulvestrant and one placebo [identical in appearance to study drug]) on days 0, 14 (two placebo injections only), and 28 and every 28 (±3) days thereafter. OS was analyzed using an unadjusted log-rank test. No adjustments were made for multiplicity. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and best response to subsequent therapy were also reported. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: In total, 736 women (median age = 61.0 years) were randomly assigned to fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 362) or 250 mg (n = 374). At the final survival analysis, 554 of 736 (75.3%) patients had died. Median OS was 26.4 months for fulvestrant 500 mg and 22.3 months for 250 mg (hazard ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval = 0.69-0.96; nominal P = .02). There were no clinically important differences in SAE profiles between the treatment groups; no clustering of SAEs could be detected in either treatment group. Type of first subsequent therapy and objective responses to first subsequent therapy were well balanced between the two treatment groups.

Conclusions: In patients with locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, fulvestrant 500 mg is associated with a 19% reduction in risk of death and a 4.1-month difference in median OS compared with fulvestrant 250 mg. Fulvestrant 500 mg was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram. DCO = data cutoff.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall survival from date of randomization. A) Overall survival for when 50% of patients had died. B) Overall survival for when 75% of patients had died. Analysis by log-rank test. P values are two-sided. *No adjustments for multiplicity were made. Tick marks indicate censored observations. CI = confidence interval. © 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved (9).

References

    1. Howell A, Robertson JFR, Quaresma Albano J, et al. Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(16):3396–3403
    1. Cano A, Matallin P, Legua V, Tortajada M, Bonilla-Musoles F. Tamoxifen and the uterus and endometrium. Lancet. 1989;1(8634):376
    1. Ewer MS, Glück S. A woman’s heart: the impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on cardiovascular health. Cancer. 2009;115(9):1813–1826
    1. Santen RJ. Clinical review: effect of endocrine therapies on bone in breast cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(2):308–319
    1. Osborne CK, Pippen J, Jones SE, et al. Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of a North American trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(16):3386–3395
    1. DeFriend DJ, Howell A, Nicholson RI, et al. Investigation of a new pure antiestrogen (ICI 182780) in women with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1994;54(2):408–414
    1. Robertson JF, Nicholson RI, Bundred NJ, et al. Comparison of the short-term biological effects of 7alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (Faslodex) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61(18):6739–6746
    1. Addo S, Yates RA, Laight A. A phase I trial to assess the pharmacology of the new oestrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant on the endometrium in healthy postmenopausal volunteers. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(12):1354–1359
    1. Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250mg with fulvestrant 500mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4594–4600
    1. Robertson JF, Osborne CK, Howell A, et al. Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women: a prospective combined analysis of two multicenter trials. Cancer. 2003;98(2):229–238
    1. Robertson JF, Llombart-Cussac A, Rolski J, et al. Activity of fulvestrant 500mg versus anastrozole 1mg as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: results from the FIRST study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(27):4530–4535
    1. Robertson JF, Lindemann J, Llombart-Cussac A, et al. Fulvestrant 500mg versus anastrozole 1mg for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: follow-up analysis from the randomized ‘FIRST’ study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(2):503–511
    1. Mehta RS, Barlow WE, Albain KS, et al. Combination anastrozole and fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):435–444
    1. Bergh J, Jönsson PE, Lidbrink EK, et al. FACT: an open-label randomized Phase III study of fulvestrant and anastrozole in combination compared with anastrozole alone as first-line therapy for patients with receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1919–1925
    1. Di Leo A, Malorni L. Polyendocrine treatment in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a “FACT” yet to be proven. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1897–1900
    1. Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(6):520–529
    1. Massarweh S, Schiff R. Unraveling the mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: new therapeutic opportunities. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(7):1950–1954
    1. Robertson JFR. Fulvestrant (Faslodex)—how to make a good drug better. Oncologist. 2007;12(7):774–784

Source: PubMed

3
订阅