Lovastatin lactone may improve irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) by inhibiting enzymes in the archaeal methanogenesis pathway

Steven M Muskal, Joe Sliman, John Kokai-Kun, Mark Pimentel, Vince Wacher, Klaus Gottlieb, Steven M Muskal, Joe Sliman, John Kokai-Kun, Mark Pimentel, Vince Wacher, Klaus Gottlieb

Abstract

Methane produced by the methanoarchaeon Methanobrevibacter smithii ( M. smithii) has been linked to constipation, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C), and obesity. Lovastatin, which demonstrates a cholesterol-lowering effect by the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, may also have an anti-methanogenesis effect through direct inhibition of enzymes in the archaeal methanogenesis pathway. We conducted protein-ligand docking experiments to evaluate this possibility. Results are consistent with recent clinical findings.

Methods: F420-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase ( mtd), a key methanogenesis enzyme was modeled for two different methanogenic archaea: M. smithii and Methanopyrus kandleri. Once protein models were developed, ligand-binding sites were identified. Multiple ligands and their respective protonation, isomeric and tautomeric representations were docked into each site, including F420-coenzyme (natural ligand), lactone and β-hydroxyacid forms of lovastatin and simvastatin, and other co-complexed ligands found in related crystal structures.

Results: 1) Generally, for each modeled site the lactone form of the statins had more favorable site interactions compared to F420; 2) The statin lactone forms generally had the most favorable docking scores, even relative to the native template PDB ligands; and 3) The statin β-hydroxyacid forms had less favorable docking scores, typically scoring in the middle with some of the F420 tautomeric forms. Consistent with these computational results were those from a recent phase II clinical trial ( NCT02495623) with a proprietary, modified-release lovastatin-lactone (SYN-010) in patients with IBS-C, which showed a reduction in symptoms and breath methane levels, compared to placebo.

Conclusion: The lactone form of lovastatin exhibits preferential binding over the native-F420 coenzyme ligand in silico and thus could inhibit the activity of the key M. smithii methanogenesis enzyme mtd in vivo. Statin lactones may thus exert a methane-reducing effect that is distinct from cholesterol lowering activity, which requires HMGR inhibition by statin β-hydroxyacid forms.

Keywords: IBS; IBS-C; Lovastatin; homology modeling; multi-site docking.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Modeled quaternary structure ofA5UMI1/3IQZB (cyan) andA5UMI1/3IQZF (pink) after respective alignments onto chain-B and chain-F of 3IQZ within PyMOL . 3IQZ’s chain-F is highlighted in silver. Dual chain model site residues (blue surface) were inferred from residues in chain-B and chain-F models that are within 7 Å of the 3IQZ ligand (H4M - white). 3IQZ’s chain-B and chain-F form a quaternary structure with two different H4M binding sites (bottom).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Best scoring lovastatin-lactone and -hydroxyacid poses inA5UMI1 3IQZB_SiteSeeker2 (top) andQ02394 4JJF_SiteSeeker (bottom). Lovastatin-lactone form is shown with green sticks and hydroxyacid form with red sticks. Residues within 5 angstroms of ligands are labeled. Hydrophilic site residues are shown in cyan and hydrophobic residues in gray.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Lovastatin-lactone 1: (top) [Calculated affinity: -7.2 (kcal/mol); AutoDock4.1Score: 14.3]; 2: (bottom) F420 [Calculated affinity: -6.99 (kcal/mol); AutoDock4.1Score: 63.3] docked into A5UMI1_3IQZB_SiteSeeker2. Hydrogen bond interactions are denoted with yellow dotted lines.

References

    1. Facts About IBS.
    1. Sperber AD, Dumitrascu D, Fukudo S, et al. : The global prevalence of IBS in adults remains elusive due to the heterogeneity of studies: a Rome Foundation working team literature review. Gut. 2016; pii: gutjnl-2015-311240. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311240
    1. Pimentel M, Gunsalus RP, Rao SSC, et al. : Methanogens in Human Health and Disease. Am J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2012;1(1):28–33. 10.1038/ajgsup.2012.6
    1. Zhang H, Banaszak JE, Parameswaran P, et al. : Focused-Pulsed sludge pre-treatment increases the bacterial diversity and relative abundance of acetoclastic methanogens in a full-scale anaerobic digester. Water Res. 2009;43(18):4517–26. 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.034
    1. Miller TL, Wolin MJ: Methanogens in human and animal intestinal Tracts. System Appl Microbiol. 1986;7(2–3):223–9. 10.1016/S0723-2020(86)80010-8
    1. Jain S, Caforio A, Driessen AJ: Biosynthesis of archaeal membrane ether lipids. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:641. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00641
    1. Miller TL, Wolin MJ: Inhibition of growth of methane-producing bacteria of the ruminant forestomach by hydroxymethylglutaryl-SCoA reductase inhibitors. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84(6):1445–8. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70177-4
    1. Marsh E, Morales W, Chua KS, et al. : Lovastatin Lactone Inhibits Methane Production in Human Stool Homogenates.
    1. Jahromi MF, Liang JB, Ho YW, et al. : Lovastatin production by Aspergillus terreus using agro-biomass as substrate in solid state fermentation. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012: 196264. 10.1155/2012/196264
    1. Liu J, Zhang J, Shi Y, et al. : Chinese red yeast rice ( Monascus purpureus) for primary hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chin Med. 2006;1:4. 10.1186/1749-8546-1-4
    1. Zhao ZJ, Pan YZ, Liu QJ, et al. : Exposure assessment of lovastatin in Pu-erh tea. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;164(1):26–31. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.03.018
    1. Pérez-Gil J, Rodríguez-Concepción M: Metabolic plasticity for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria. Biochem J. 2013;452(1):19–25. 10.1042/BJ20121899
    1. Gottlieb K, Wacher V, Sliman J, et al. : Review article: inhibition of methanogenic archaea by statins as a targeted management strategy for constipation and related disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43(2):197–212. 10.1111/apt.13469
    1. Sharma A, Chaudhary PP, Sirohi SK, et al. : Structure modeling and inhibitor prediction ofNADP oxidoreductase enzyme from Methanobrevibacter smithii. Bioinformation. 2011;6(1):15–9. 10.6026/97320630006015
    1. Ferry JG: Enzymology of one-carbon metabolism in methanogenic pathways. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1999;23(1):13–38. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00390.x
    1. Protein Data Bank archive (PDB).
    1. UniProt Consortium: UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D204–12. 10.1093/nar/gku989
    1. List of protein structure prediction software.
    1. Debe DA, Danzer JF, Goddard WA, et al. : STRUCTFAST: protein sequence remote homology detection and alignment using novel dynamic programming and profile-profile scoring. Proteins. 2006;64(4):960–7. 10.1002/prot.21049
    1. Poleksic A, Danzer JF, Hambly K, et al. : Convergent Island Statistics: a fast method for determining local alignment score significance. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(12):2827–31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti433
    1. Palmer B, Danzer JF, Hambly K, et al. : StructSorter: a method for continuously updating a comprehensive protein structure alignment database. J Chem Inf Model. 2006;46(4):1871–6. 10.1021/ci0601012
    1. Hambly K, Danzer J, Muskal S, et al. : Interrogating the druggable genome with structural informatics. Mol Divers. 2006;10(3):273–81. 10.1007/s11030-006-9035-3
    1. Eidogen-Sertanty SiteSeeker.Eidogen-Sertanty, Inc.
    1. BIOVIA Pipeline Pilot.
    1. Tripos Mol2 File Format.
    1. Trott O, Olson AJ: AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–61. 10.1002/jcc.21334
    1. Dallakyan S: MGLTools.
    1. Schrodinger LLC: The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Version 1.8.2015.
    1. Kim S, Thiessen PA, Bolton EE, et al. : PubChem Substance and Compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1202–13. 10.1093/nar/gkv951
    1. Duggan DE, Chen IW, Bayne WF, et al. : The physiological disposition of lovastatin. Drug Metab Dispos. 1989;17(2):166–73.
    1. Sirtori CR: The pharmacology of statins. Pharmacol Res. 2014;88:3–11. 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.03.002
    1. Wood WG, Mΰller WE, Eckert GP: Statins and neuroprotection: basic pharmacology needed. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;50(1):214–20. 10.1007/s12035-014-8647-3
    1. Khelaifia S, Brunel JM, Raoult D, et al. : Hydrophobicity of imidazole derivatives correlates with improved activity against human methanogenic archaea. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;41(6):544–7. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.02.013
    1. Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2).
    1. Gottlieb K: NCT02495623 - A Study of the Effect of SYN-010 on Subjects With : Synthetic Biologics Inc., editor.2015.
    1. Muskal S, Sliman J, Kokai-Kun J, et al. : Dataset 1 in: Lovastatin lactone may improve irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) by inhibiting enzymes in the archaeal methanogenesis pathway. F1000Research. 2016.
    1. Muskal S, Sliman J, Kokai-Kun J, et al. : Lovastatin-lactone v. F420 in the A5UMI1 site. Figshare. 2016.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅