Drinking behavior training for stroke patients using action observation and practice of upper limb function

Daehee Lee, Hyolyun Roh, Jungseo Park, Sangyoung Lee, Seulki Han, Daehee Lee, Hyolyun Roh, Jungseo Park, Sangyoung Lee, Seulki Han

Abstract

[Purpose] This study examined the effects of action observation and action practice on stroke patients' upper limb function. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 33 chronic stroke patients who were randomly assigned to four groups. The action observation group (5 males, 3 females) watched a video of the task, the action practice group (5 males, 4 females) performed the action, the combined action observation-action practice group (5 males, 4 females) watched the video of the task and practiced the action, and the control group (4 males, 3 females) did not perform either action observation or action practice. The video used in the action observational physical training comprised a scene of an adult male picking up a cup, bringing it to his mouth in order to touch his mouth, and then returning the cup to its initial position. [Results] Improvements in drinking behavior functions were observed immediately after the experiment and one week later. After the intervention, the number of drinking motions had increased the most in the combination group. One week after the experiment, there were increases in the action observation, action training, and combination groups. [Conclusion] A combination of action observation and action training is the most effective treatment method, and action training is a desirable second to combined therapy.

Keywords: Action observation; Drinking behavior training; Upper limb function.

References

    1. British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine Royal College of Physicians: Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: national clinical guidelines. London: 2003
    1. Strokes M: Physical Management of Neurological Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004
    1. Bovend’Eerdt TJ, Dawes H, Sackley C, et al. : An integrated motor imagery program to improve functional task performance in neurorehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010, 91: 939–946
    1. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL: Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol, 2006, 19: 55–63
    1. de Vries S, Mulder T: Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: a critical discussion. J Rehabil Med, 2007, 39: 5–13
    1. Léonard G, Tremblay F: Corticomotor facilitation associated with observation, imagery and imitation of hand actions: a comparative study in young and old adults. Exp Brain Res, 2007, 177: 167–175
    1. Kim SW, Woo MJ: The effect of action observation on the performance of a golf-putting task in students with mental retardation. J Adapt Phys Act, 2010, 18: 15–31
    1. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L: The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2004, 27: 169–192
    1. Lee SY, Lee MH, Bae SS, et al. : The effect of action observation and motor imagery of serial reaction time task in mirror neuron activation. J Korea Soc Phy Med, 2010, 5: 395–404
    1. Sakamoto M, Muraoka T, Mizucuchi N, et al. : Combining observation and imagery of an action enhances human corticospinal excitability. Neurosci Res, 2009, 65: 23–27
    1. Kim JM, Yang BI, Lee MK: The effects of action observational physical training on manual dexterity in stroke patients. PTK, 2010, 17: 17–24

Source: PubMed

3
订阅