Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: The wet suction technique

Nicolas A Villa, Manuel Berzosa, Michael B Wallace, Isaac Raijman, Nicolas A Villa, Manuel Berzosa, Michael B Wallace, Isaac Raijman

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become a fundamental tool in obtaining cytopathological diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. When sampling solid lesions of the pancreas, the endosonographer can use two suction techniques to enhance tissue acquisition; the dry and the wet suction techniques. The standard dry suction technique relies on applying negative pressure suction on the proximal end of the needle after the stylet is removed with a pre-vacuum syringe. The wet suction technique relies on pre-flushing the needle with saline to replace the column of air with fluid followed by aspiration the proximal end by using a prefilled syringe with saline. A new modified wet suction technique (hybrid suction technique) relies on preloading the needle with saline, but having continuous negative pressure with a pre-vacuum syringe to avoid manual intermittent suction. Tissue acquisition can be enhanced by applying fluid dynamic principles to the current aspiration techniques, such as the column of water used in the needle of the wet technique. In this review, we will focus on EUS-FNA using the wet suction technique for sampling of pancreatic solid lesions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CFD model comparing volume of tissue aspirate between air-filled and water-filled needles in 0.1 s
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Comparison of the total volume of aspirate between the hybrid, wet, and dry techniques (b) FNA specimens from the hybrid, wet, and dry techniques

References

    1. Byrne MF, Jowell PS. Gastrointestinal imaging: Endoscopic ultrasound. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1631–48.
    1. Wani S. Basic techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: Role of a stylet and suction. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3:17–21.
    1. Costache MI, Iordache S, Karstensen JG, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: From the past to the future. Endosc Ultrasound. 2013;2:77–85.
    1. Lachter J. Basic technique in the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: What needle is the best? Endosc Ultrasound. 2013;3:46–53.
    1. Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Durkalski V, et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:441–7.
    1. Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH, et al. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:745–51.
    1. Attam R, Arain MA, Bloechl SJ, et al. “Wet Suction Technique (WEST)”: A novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1401–7.
    1. Berzosa M, Uthamaraj S, Dragomir-Daescu, et al. EUS-FNA Wet vs. Dry suction techniques: A proof of concept study on how a column of water enhances tissue aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(Suppl):AB421–2.
    1. Berzosa M, Villa N, Bartel MJ, et al. Pilot study comparing hybrid vs. wet vs. dry suction techniques for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Gastrointest Endos. 2014;79:AB430.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅