A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Marc D Breton, Lauren G Kanapka, Roy W Beck, Laya Ekhlaspour, Gregory P Forlenza, Eda Cengiz, Melissa Schoelwer, Katrina J Ruedy, Emily Jost, Lori Carria, Emma Emory, Liana J Hsu, Mary Oliveri, Craig C Kollman, Betsy B Dokken, Stuart A Weinzimer, Mark D DeBoer, Bruce A Buckingham, Daniel Cherñavvsky, R Paul Wadwa, iDCL Trial Research Group, Melissa Schoelwer, Marc Breton, Mark DeBoer, Linda Gonder-Frederick, Daniel Cherñavvsky, Jessica Robic, Emma Emory, Mary Voelmle, Katie Conschafter, Kimberly Morris, Charlotte Barnett, Kelly Carr, Jacob Hellmann, Matthew Kime, Mary Oliveri, R Paul Wadwa, Greg Forlenza, G Todd Alonso, Robert Slover, Laurel Messer, Erin Cobry, Emily Jost, Cari Berget, Lindsey Towers, Samantha Lange, Bruce Buckingham, David Maahs, Rayhan Lal, Laya Ekhlaspour, Lisa Norlander, Korey Hood, Marissa Town, Christine Weir, Kerren Smith, Liana Hsu, Deanna Shinksy, Julia Viana, Eda Cengiz, Stuart Weinzimer, Kate Weyman, Lori Carria, Melinda Zgorski, Katrina Ruedy, Roy Beck, Sarah Borgman, Jessica Rusnak, Lauren Kanapka, Craig Kollman, Carlos Murphy, Guillermo Arreza-Rubin, Neal Green, Boris Kovatchev, Sue Brown, Stacey Anderson, Lori Laffel, Jordan Pinsker, Carol Levy, Yogish C Kudva, Francis Doyle 3rd, Eric Renard, Claudio Cobelli, Yves Reznik, John Lum, Robert Janicek, Deanna Gabrielson, Marc D Breton, Lauren G Kanapka, Roy W Beck, Laya Ekhlaspour, Gregory P Forlenza, Eda Cengiz, Melissa Schoelwer, Katrina J Ruedy, Emily Jost, Lori Carria, Emma Emory, Liana J Hsu, Mary Oliveri, Craig C Kollman, Betsy B Dokken, Stuart A Weinzimer, Mark D DeBoer, Bruce A Buckingham, Daniel Cherñavvsky, R Paul Wadwa, iDCL Trial Research Group, Melissa Schoelwer, Marc Breton, Mark DeBoer, Linda Gonder-Frederick, Daniel Cherñavvsky, Jessica Robic, Emma Emory, Mary Voelmle, Katie Conschafter, Kimberly Morris, Charlotte Barnett, Kelly Carr, Jacob Hellmann, Matthew Kime, Mary Oliveri, R Paul Wadwa, Greg Forlenza, G Todd Alonso, Robert Slover, Laurel Messer, Erin Cobry, Emily Jost, Cari Berget, Lindsey Towers, Samantha Lange, Bruce Buckingham, David Maahs, Rayhan Lal, Laya Ekhlaspour, Lisa Norlander, Korey Hood, Marissa Town, Christine Weir, Kerren Smith, Liana Hsu, Deanna Shinksy, Julia Viana, Eda Cengiz, Stuart Weinzimer, Kate Weyman, Lori Carria, Melinda Zgorski, Katrina Ruedy, Roy Beck, Sarah Borgman, Jessica Rusnak, Lauren Kanapka, Craig Kollman, Carlos Murphy, Guillermo Arreza-Rubin, Neal Green, Boris Kovatchev, Sue Brown, Stacey Anderson, Lori Laffel, Jordan Pinsker, Carol Levy, Yogish C Kudva, Francis Doyle 3rd, Eric Renard, Claudio Cobelli, Yves Reznik, John Lum, Robert Janicek, Deanna Gabrielson

Abstract

Background: A closed-loop system of insulin delivery (also called an artificial pancreas) may improve glycemic outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: In a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial, we assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, children 6 to 13 years of age who had type 1 diabetes to receive treatment with the use of either a closed-loop system of insulin delivery (closed-loop group) or a sensor-augmented insulin pump (control group). The primary outcome was the percentage of time that the glucose level was in the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring.

Results: A total of 101 children underwent randomization (78 to the closed-loop group and 23 to the control group); the glycated hemoglobin levels at baseline ranged from 5.7 to 10.1%. The mean (±SD) percentage of time that the glucose level was in the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter increased from 53±17% at baseline to 67±10% (the mean over 16 weeks of treatment) in the closed-loop group and from 51±16% to 55±13% in the control group (mean adjusted difference, 11 percentage points [equivalent to 2.6 hours per day]; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 14; P<0.001). In both groups, the median percentage of time that the glucose level was below 70 mg per deciliter was low (1.6% in the closed-loop group and 1.8% in the control group). In the closed-loop group, the median percentage of time that the system was in the closed-loop mode was 93% (interquartile range, 91 to 95). No episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia occurred in either group.

Conclusions: In this 16-week trial involving children with type 1 diabetes, the glucose level was in the target range for a greater percentage of time with the use of a closed-loop system than with the use of a sensor-augmented insulin pump. (Funded by Tandem Diabetes Care and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03844789.).

Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Figures

Figure 1.. Percentage of Time with the…
Figure 1.. Percentage of Time with the Glucose Level in the Target Range.
Panel A shows a box plot of the percentage of time that the glucose level was in the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter (3.9 to 10.0 mmol per liter), as measured by continuous glucose monitoring, during 4-week periods over 4 months among patients who were assigned to receive treatment with either a closed-loop system (closed loop) or a sensor-augmented pump (control). The black dots denote the mean values, the horizontal bars the median values, and the lower and upper boundaries of each box the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Panel B shows an envelope plot of the same outcome according to the time of day. The data points denote the hourly median values, and the lower and upper boundary of each shaded region the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅