Cognitive control training for emotion-related impulsivity

Andrew D Peckham, Sheri L Johnson, Andrew D Peckham, Sheri L Johnson

Abstract

Many forms of psychopathology are tied to a heightened tendency to respond impulsively to strong emotions, and this tendency, in turn, is closely tied to problems with cognitive control. The goal of the present study was to test whether a two-week, six-session cognitive control training program is efficacious in reducing emotion-related impulsivity. Participants (N = 52) reporting elevated scores on an emotion-related impulsivity measure completed cognitive control training targeting working memory and response inhibition. A subset of participants were randomized to a waitlist control group. Impulsivity, emotion regulation, and performance on near and far-transfer cognitive tasks were assessed at baseline and after completion of training. Emotion-related impulsivity declined significantly from pre-training to post-training and at two-week follow-up; improvements were not observed in the waitlist control group. A decrease in brooding rumination and an increase in reappraisal were also observed. Participants showed significant improvements on trained versions of the working memory and inhibition tasks as well as improvements on an inhibition transfer task. In sum, these preliminary findings show that cognitive training appears to be well-tolerated for people with significant emotion-driven impulsivity. Results provide preliminary support for the efficacy of cognitive training interventions as a way to reduce emotion-related impulsivity.

Keywords: Cognitive control; Cognitive training; Emotion; Impulsivity; Urgency.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1. CONSORT Diagram of Study Enrollment
Figure 1. CONSORT Diagram of Study Enrollment
Note. *The first 10 participants were automatically enrolled in the pilot phase; the remainder were randomly assigned. “Received Intervention” indicates that participant completed at least one full training session. Not all participants completed the target dose of 6 sessions (see Results).
Figure 2. Change in Feelings Trigger Action…
Figure 2. Change in Feelings Trigger Action scores in the Waitlist and Intervention Conditions
Note. Time 1: Screening; Time 2: Post-Waitlist (waitlist), Post-Training (Intervention). n = 19 (waitlist), n =22 (intervention). Error bars = +/- 1 SE.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅