Experiences and views of patients, carers and healthcare professionals on using modems in domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV): a qualitative study

Stephanie K Mansell, Cherry Kilbride, Martin J Wood, Francesca Gowing, Swapna Mandal, Stephanie K Mansell, Cherry Kilbride, Martin J Wood, Francesca Gowing, Swapna Mandal

Abstract

Background: Advances in technology means that domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) devices can be remotely monitored via modems in patients' homes. Possible benefits and challenges of modem technology have yet to be established. This study explored the perspectives and experiences of patients, their carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the addition of modem technology in managing home NIV.

Methods: A qualitative study using a combination of focus groups for HCPs and interviews for carers/patients was undertaken. 12 HCPs and 22 patients/carers participated. These focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

Results: Five main themes were identified. 'Surveillance: a paradox of findings': HCPs were concerned about unduly scrutinising patients' lives, potentially impacting on HCP patient relationships. Conversely, patients welcomed modem monitoring and did not express concerns regarding invasion of privacy. 'Sanctions': HCPs reported the modem increased access to care and allowed appropriate assessment of ongoing treatment. 'Complacency and ethics': HCPs expressed concerns patients may become complacent in seeking help due to expectations of modem monitoring, as well as being concerned regarding the ethics of modems. There was a suggestion patients and carers' expectations of monitoring were different to that of clinical practice, resulting in complacency in some cases. 'Increased time for patient focused care': HCPs in the focus groups described a number of ways in which using modems was more efficient. 'Confidence: can be improved with technology': patients and carers were positive about the impact of the modems on their health and well-being, particularly their confidence.

Conclusion: HCPs expressed concerns about surveillance were not corroborated by patients, suggesting acceptability of remote monitoring. Data suggests a need for increased clarity to patients/carers regarding clinical practice relating to responsiveness to modem data. The issue of complacency requires further consideration. Modem technology was acceptable and considered a useful addition by HCPs, patients and carers.

Trial registration number: NCT03905382.

Keywords: non invasive ventilation; respiratory measurement.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SKM and SM have received honorarium from Philips Respironics for providing lectures and education. SKM and SM have received research grants from Philips Respironics.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of recruitment of participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mind map illustrating contribution of data sources to each theme. HCP, healthcare professional.

References

    1. Murphy PB, Rehal S, Arbane G, et al. . Effect of home noninvasive ventilation with oxygen therapy vs oxygen therapy alone on hospital readmission or death after an acute COPD exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:2177–86. 10.1001/jama.2017.4451
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellance Motor neurone disease: the use of non-invasive ventilation in the management of motor neurone disease. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellance, 2010.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Motor neurone disease: assessment and management: NICE guideline NG42 2016.
    1. Bourke SC, Tomlinson M, Williams TL, et al. . Effects of non-invasive ventilation on survival and quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:140–7. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70326-4
    1. Simonds AK, Elliott MW. Outcome of domiciliary nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in restrictive and obstructive disorders. Thorax 1995;50:604–9. 10.1136/thx.50.6.604
    1. Elliott MW. The interface: crucial for successful noninvasive ventilation. Eur Respir J 2004;23:7–8. 10.1183/09031936.03.00115903
    1. Boussaïd G, Lofaso F, Santos DB, et al. . Factors influencing compliance with non-invasive ventilation at long-term in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1: a prospective cohort. Neuromuscul Disord 2016;26:666–74. 10.1016/j.nmd.2016.07.014
    1. Werpachowska A, Inayat B, Howard M, et al. . One-Year experience of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) monitoring via wireless modem in a district general Hospital (DGH). Eur Respir J 2016;48:PA2163.
    1. Lopes de Almeida JP, Pinto A, Pinto S, et al. . Economic cost of home-telemonitoring care for BiPAP-assisted ALS individuals. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2012;13:533–7. 10.3109/17482968.2012.703675
    1. Pinto A, Almeida JP, Pinto S, et al. . Home telemonitoring of non-invasive ventilation decreases healthcare utilisation in a prospective controlled trial of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:1238–42. 10.1136/jnnp.2010.206680
    1. Borel J-C, Pelletier J, Taleux N, et al. . Parameters recorded by software of non-invasive ventilators predict COPD exacerbation: a proof-of-concept study. Thorax 2015;70:284–5. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206569
    1. Villanueva JA, Suarez MC, Garmendia O, et al. . The role of telemedicine and mobile health in the monitoring of sleep-breathing disorders: improving patient outcomes. Smart Homecare Technology TeleHealth 2017;4:1–11. 10.2147/SHTT.S108048
    1. Ambrosino N, Vitacca M, Dreher M, et al. . Tele-monitoring of ventilator-dependent patients: a European respiratory Society statement. Eur Respir J 2016;48:648–63. 10.1183/13993003.01721-2015
    1. Gallar P, Vigil A, Rodríguez I, et al. . Two-Year experience with telemedicine in the follow-up of patients in home peritoneal dialysis. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13:288–92. 10.1258/135763307781644906
    1. Mansell SK, Cutts S, Hackney I, et al. . Using domiciliary non-invasive ventilator data downloads to inform clinical decision-making to optimise ventilation delivery and patient compliance. BMJ Open Respir Res 2018;5:e000238 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000238
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. . Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:117 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
    1. Shneerson JM, Simonds AK. Noninvasive ventilation for chest wall and neuromuscular disorders. Eur Respir J 2002;20:480–7. 10.1183/09031936.02.00404002
    1. Agency for Clinical Innovation Respiratory Network Domiciliary non-invasive ventilation in adult patients: a consensus statement. Australia: Agency for Clinical Innovation Respiratory Network, 2012.
    1. Simonds AK. Home mechanical ventilation: an overview. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016;13:2035–44. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-454FR
    1. Priou P, Hamel J-F, Person C, et al. . Long-Term outcome of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Chest 2010;138:84–90. 10.1378/chest.09-2472
    1. Köhnlein T, Windisch W, Köhler D, et al. . Non-Invasive positive pressure ventilation for the treatment of severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014;2:698–705. 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70153-5
    1. Masefield S, Vitacca M, Dreher M, et al. . Attitudes and preferences of home mechanical ventilation users from four European countries: an ERS/ELF survey. ERJ Open Res 2017;3:15–7. 10.1183/23120541.00015-2017
    1. Ricci RP, Morichelli L, Quarta L, et al. . Long-Term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring. Europace 2010;12:674–9. 10.1093/europace/euq046
    1. Marzegalli M, Lunati M, Landolina M, et al. . Remote monitoring of CRT-ICD: the multicenter Italian CareLink evaluation--ease of use, acceptance, and organizational implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008;31:1259–64. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01175.x
    1. Warland A, Paraskevopoulos I, Tsekleves E, et al. . The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a low-cost, virtual-reality based, upper-limb stroke rehabilitation device: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil 2019;41:1–16. 10.1080/09638288.2018.1459881
    1. Aoun SM, Bentley B, Funk L, et al. . A 10-year literature review of family caregiving for motor neurone disease: moving from caregiver burden studies to palliative care interventions. Palliat Med 2013;27:437–46. 10.1177/0269216312455729
    1. MacLaren J, Smith P, Rodgers S, et al. . A qualitative study of experiences of health and social care in home mechanical ventilation. Nurs Open 2019;6:283–92. 10.1002/nop2.213
    1. Chatwin M, Hawkins G, Panicchia L, et al. . Randomised crossover trial of telemonitoring in chronic respiratory patients (TeleCRAFT trial). Thorax 2016;71:305–11. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207045
    1. National Health Service NHS Long term plan. NHS, 2019.
    1. NHS Digital Digital inclusion for health and social care. NHS Digital, 2018.
    1. NHS Health Education England NHS Long Term Plan : NHS digital. digital inclusion for health and social care. NHS Digital, 2018.
    1. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research In: Handbook of qualitative research. 2, 1994: 163–94.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅