Application of 3D Printing in the Surgical Planning of Trimalleolar Fracture and Doctor-Patient Communication

Long Yang, Xian-Wen Shang, Jian-Nan Fan, Zhi-Xu He, Jian-Ji Wang, Miao Liu, Yong Zhuang, Chuan Ye, Long Yang, Xian-Wen Shang, Jian-Nan Fan, Zhi-Xu He, Jian-Ji Wang, Miao Liu, Yong Zhuang, Chuan Ye

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of 3D printing in treating trimalleolar fractures and its roles in physician-patient communication, thirty patients with trimalleolar fractures were randomly divided into the 3D printing assisted-design operation group (Group A) and the no-3D printing assisted-design group (Group B). In Group A, 3D printing was used by the surgeons to produce a prototype of the actual fracture to guide the surgical treatment. All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation. A questionnaire was designed for doctors and patients to verify the verisimilitude and effectiveness of the 3D-printed prototype. Meanwhile, the operation time and the intraoperative blood loss were compared between the two groups. The fracture prototypes were accurately printed, and the average overall score of the verisimilitude and effectiveness of the 3D-printed prototypes was relatively high. Both the operation time and the intraoperative blood loss in Group A were less than those in Group B (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction using the 3D-printed prototype and the communication score were 9.3 ± 0.6 points. A 3D-printed prototype can faithfully reflect the anatomy of the fracture site; it can effectively help the doctors plan the operation and represent an effective tool for physician-patient communication.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 37-year-old female had a left trimalleolar fracture and underwent open reduction and internal fixation. 3D prototype was designed and printed by the authors; it was used for preoperative planning: (a) preoperative X-ray film; (b) postoperative X-ray film; (c) preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction by Mimics software; (d, e) digital fracture prototype and the corresponding 3D-printed 1 : 1 solid prototype.

References

    1. Qiao F., Li D., Jin Z., Hao D., Liao Y., Gong S. A novel combination of computer-assisted reduction technique and three dimensional printed patient-specific external fixator for treatment of tibial fractures. International Orthopaedics. 2016;40(4):835–841. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2943-z.
    1. Zhang W., Lian Q., Li D., et al. Cartilage repair and subchondral bone migration using 3d printing osteochondral composites: a one-year-period study in rabbit trochlea. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:16. doi: 10.1155/2014/746138.746138
    1. Li Z., Li Z., Xu R., et al. Three-dimensional printing models improve understanding of spinal fracture—a randomized controlled study in china. Scientific Reports. 2015;5 doi: 10.1038/srep11570.11570
    1. Li C., Yang M., Xie Y., et al. Application of the polystyrene model made by 3-D printing rapid prototyping technology for operation planning in revision lumbar discectomy. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2015;20(3, article no. 706):475–480. doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0706-8.
    1. Schout B. M. A., Bemelmans B. L. H., Martens E. J., Scherpbier A. J. J. A., Hendrikx A. J. M. How useful and realistic is the uro trainer for training transurethral prostate and bladder tumor resection procedures? The Journal of Urology. 2009;181(3):1297–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.169.
    1. Zhang Y., Yu C.-F., Jin S.-H., Li N.-C., Na Y.-Q. Validation of a novel non-biological bench model for the training of percutaneous renal access. The International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2014;40(1):87–92. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2014.01.13.
    1. Chung K. J., Huang B., Choi C. H., Park Y. W., Kim H. N. Utility of 3D printing for complex distal tibial fractures and malleolar avulsion fractures: technical tip. Foot and Ankle International. 2015;36(12):1504–1510. doi: 10.1177/1071100715595695.
    1. Dubois-Ferrière V., Assal M. Benefit of computer assisted surgery in foot and ankle surgery. Revue Medicale Suisse. 2014;10(420):562–564.
    1. Davidovitch R. I., Weil Y., Karia R., et al. Intraoperative syndesmotic reduction: three-dimensional versus standard fluoroscopic imaging. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume. 2013;95(20):1838–1843. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.l.00382.
    1. Won S.-H., Lee Y.-K., Ha Y.-C., Suh Y.-S., Koo K.-H. Improving pre-operative planning for complex total hip replacement with a Rapid Prototype model enabling surgical simulation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2013;95(11):1458–1463. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b11.31878.
    1. Rees A., Powell L. C., Chinga-Carrasco G., et al. 3D bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:7. doi: 10.1155/2015/925757.925757
    1. Zein N. N., Hanouneh I. A., Bishop P. D., et al. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation. 2013;19(12):1304–1310. doi: 10.1002/lt.23729.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅