Functional endoscopy in neurogenic dysphagia: a feasibility study focusing on the esophageal phase of swallowing

Jan Rückert, Philipp Lenz, Hauke Heinzow, Johannes Wessling, Tobias Warnecke, Ingo F Herrmann, Michael Strahl, Frank Lenze, Tobias Nowacki, Dirk Domagk, Jan Rückert, Philipp Lenz, Hauke Heinzow, Johannes Wessling, Tobias Warnecke, Ingo F Herrmann, Michael Strahl, Frank Lenze, Tobias Nowacki, Dirk Domagk

Abstract

Background and study aims Due to demographic transition, neurogenic dysphagia has become an increasingly recognized problem. Patients suffering from dysphagia often get caught between different clinical disciplines. In this study, we implemented a defined examination protocol for evaluating the whole swallowing process by functional endoscopy. Special focus was put on the esophageal phase of swallowing. Patients and methods This prospective observational multidisciplinary study evaluated 31 consecutive patients with suspected neurogenic dysphagia by transnasal access applying an ultrathin video endoscope. Thirty-one patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms were used as a control group. We applied a modified approach including standardized endoscopic positions to compare our findings with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and high-resolution manometry. The primary outcome measure was feasibility of functional endoscopy. Secondary outcome measures were adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and pathologic endoscopic findings. Results Functional endoscopy was successfully performed in all patients. No AEs were recorded. A variety of disorders were documented by functional endoscopy: incomplete or delayed closure of the upper esophageal sphincter in retroflex view, clearance disturbance of tubular esophagus, esophageal hyperperistalsis, and hypomotility. Analysis of results obtained with the diagnostic tools showed some discrepancies. Conclusions By interdisciplinary cooperation with additional assessment of the esophageal phase of deglutition using the innovative method of functional endoscopy, the diagnosis of neurogenic disorders including dysphagia may be significantly improved, leading to a better clinical understanding of complex dysfunctional patterns. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that a retroflex view of the ultrathin video endoscope within the esophagus can be safely performed. [NCT01995929].

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

References

    1. Dziweas R, Warnecke T. Kohlhammer Verlag; 2013. Neurogene Dysphagien: Diagnostik und Therapie.
    1. Matsuo K, Palmer J B. Anatomy and physiology of feeding and swallowing: Normal and abnormal. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19:691–707.
    1. Dziewas R, Glahn J, Helfer C et al.Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for neurogenic dysphagia: Training curriculum of the German Society of Neurology and the German stroke society. BMC Medical Education. 2016;16:70.
    1. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S et al.Dysphagia after stroke: Incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36:2756–2763.
    1. Müller J, Wenning G K, Verny M et al.Progression of dysarthria and dysphagia in postmortem-confirmed Parkinsonian disorders. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:259–264.
    1. Morgan A S, Mackay L E. Causes and complications associated with swallowing disorders in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14:454–461.
    1. Ates F, Vaezi M F. The Pathogenesis and Management of Achalasia: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver. 2015;9:449–463.
    1. Wirth R, Dziewas R. Neurogene Dysphagie. Internist. 2017;58:132–140.
    1. Prosiegel M. 2015. Neurogene Dysphagien. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie.
    1. Farneti D, Consolmagno P. The Swallowing Centre: Rationale for a multidisciplinary management. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2007;27:200–207.
    1. Langmore S E, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2:216–219.
    1. Pandolfino J E, Fox M R, Bredenoord A J et al.High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: Utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:796–806.
    1. Baijens L W, Clavé P, Cras P et al.European Society for Swallowing Disorders – European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: Oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1403–1428.
    1. Bollschweiler E, Knoppe K, Wolfgarten E et al.Prevalence of dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux in Germany. Dysphagia. 2008;23:172–176.
    1. Herrmann I F, Recio S A. Functional pharyngoesophagoscopy: A new technique for diagnostics and analyzing deglutition. Oper Techniq Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;8:163–167.
    1. Arens C, Herrmann I F, Rohrbach S et al.Positionspapier der DGHNO und der DGPP - Stand der klinischen und endoskopischen Diagnostik, Evaluation und Therapie von Schluckstörungen bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Laryngorhinootologie. 2015;94:S306–S354.
    1. Langmore S E. New York: Thieme; 2001. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders.
    1. Pandolfino J E. High-resolution manometry: Is it better for detecting esophageal disease? Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;6:632–634.
    1. Weingart V, Schönfeld A, editors. Karlsruhe: Standard Light; 2012. High-Resolution-Manometrie des Ösophagus: Bildatlas und Lehrbuch.
    1. van Hoeij F B, Bredenoord A J. Clinical application of esophageal high-resolution manometry in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22:6–13.
    1. Kahrilas P J. Esophageal motor disorders in terms of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: What has changed? Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:981–987.
    1. Medtronic. Medtronic ManoScan ESO Brochure 2019Accessed: 30.06.2020
    1. Ghosh S K, Pandolfino J E, Rice J et al.Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: A quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G878–G885.
    1. Kahrilas P J, Bredenoord A J, Fox M et al.The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–174.
    1. Carlson D A, Pandolfino J E. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;11:374–384.
    1. Bredenoord A J, Fox M, Kahrilas P J et al.Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroentero Motil. 2012;24:57–65.
    1. Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A et al.Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:188–194.
    1. Goetz C G, Poewe W, Rascol O et al.Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: Status and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2004;19:1020–1028.
    1. Rohof W OA, Bredenoord A J. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19:37.
    1. Mielens J D, Hoffman M R, Ciucci M R et al.Automated analysis of pharyngeal pressure data obtained with high-resolution manometry. Dysphagia. 2011;26:3–12.
    1. Wang Y T, Yazaki E, Sifrim D. High-resolution manometry: esophageal disorders not addressed by the “Chicago Classification”. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:365–372.
    1. O'Sullivan S S, Massey L A, Williams D R et al.Clinical outcomes of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy. Brain. 2008;131:1362–1372.
    1. Warnecke T, Oelenberg S, Teismann I et al.Endoscopic characteristics and levodopa responsiveness of swallowing function in progressive supranuclear palsy. Movement Disorders. 2010;25:1239–1245.
    1. Bredenoord A J. Minor disorders of esophageal peristalsis: highly prevalent, minimally relevant? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1424–1425.
    1. Hoogenboom S A, Bagci U, Wallace M B. AI in gastroenterology. The current state of play and the potential. How will it affect our practice and when? Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2019:150634.
    1. Vaughn B, Rotolo S, Roth H. Circadian rhythm and sleep influences on digestive physiology and disorders. CPT 2014. p. 67.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅