Phase 1b/3 Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Intravenous Posaconazole in Adult Asian Participants at High Risk for Invasive Fungal Infections

Depei Wu, Yingchang Mi, Jianyu Weng, Junling Zhuang, Xiaoyan Ke, Chun Wang, Kaiyan Liu, Monika Martinho, Gregory A Winchell, Yanqiao Zang, Lianzhe Xu, Depei Wu, Yingchang Mi, Jianyu Weng, Junling Zhuang, Xiaoyan Ke, Chun Wang, Kaiyan Liu, Monika Martinho, Gregory A Winchell, Yanqiao Zang, Lianzhe Xu

Abstract

Introduction: Antifungal prophylaxis in patients at high risk for invasive fungal infections (IFIs), such as those with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes, continues to be underused in Asia, despite the fact that it reduces IFI-related death and increases IFI-free survival. We characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of the intravenous (IV) formulation of posaconazole in adult Asian participants at high risk for IFI.

Methods: Participants received posaconazole IV 300 mg twice on day 1, posaconazole IV 300 mg once daily on days 2-10, and posaconazole IV 300 mg once daily or oral suspension 200 mg 3 times daily for up to 18 days for a maximum of 28 days. There were two PK sampling groups: intensive and sparse. Sparse trough PK sampling was collected from all participants on days 3, 6, 10, 15, 22, and 28/end of treatment. The intensive PK group had additional sampling performed over 24 h on day 10. Primary end points were steady state average concentration (Cavg,ss) and percentage of participants with Cavg,ss ≥ 500 ng/mL. Safety was assessed up to day 30/end of treatment.

Results: Seventy participants with acute myelogenous leukemia were enrolled, 30 in the intensive PK group and 40 in the sparse PK group; 57 participants completed the study, 26 in the intensive PK group and 31 in the sparse PK group. On day 10, arithmetic mean Cavg,ss was 2986 ng/mL [coefficient of variation (%CV), 36%; range, 1409-5930 ng/mL]; 100% of participants in the intensive PK group (n/N = 27/27) had Cavg,ss ≥ 500 ng/mL. Arithmetic mean (%CV) Cmin was 2474 (50.4%) and 2466 ng/mL (42.4%) in the intensive and sparse PK groups on day 10, respectively. Safety was similar to that of previous posaconazole formulations.

Conclusion: In Asian participants at high risk for IFIs, IV posaconazole achieved the target exposure associated with efficacy that was previously established for supporting global registration of posaconazole for IV administration and was generally well tolerated.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03336502.

Keywords: Pharmacokinetics; Posaconazole; Triazole antifungal.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Disposition of participants (all subjects as treated). aDiscontinued due to prohibited medications (n = 1) and adverse events (renal impairment and pyrexia; n = 1 each). bDiscontinued due to prohibited medications (n = 1) and adverse events (diarrhea, angina pectoris/diarrhea, embolism, ventricular tachycardia, and cardiac failure/respiratory failure; n = 1 each). PK pharmacokinetics
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of treatment duration. Interval from beginning to end of treatment (all subjects as treated). A Participants who received posaconazole IV 300 mg plus posaconazole oral suspension 200 mg 3 times daily. B Participants who only received posaconazole IV 300 mg. The number of participants is noted below the time point on the x-axis. IV intravenous, PK pharmacokinetics
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Arithmetic mean (± SD) plasma concentration (ng/mL) versus time profiles of posaconazole on day 10 in Asian participants receiving administration of posaconazole IV 300 mg twice daily on day 1 and then posaconazole IV 300 mg once daily until at least day 10 in the intensive PK sampling subgroup (n = 27; inset semi-log). IV intravenous, PK pharmacokinetics, SD stable disease
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Arithmetic mean (± SD) plasma Cmin (pre-dose) posaconazole concentration (ng/mL) after administration of posaconazole IV 300 mg twice daily on day 1 and then posaconazole IV 300 mg once daily thereafter in Asian participants (all evaluable participants in the intensive PK and sparse PK sampling subgroups who received IV posaconazole throughout the study period; n indicated for each point). Cmin minimum concentration, IV intravenous PK pharmacokinetics, SD stable disease
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Individual posaconazole plasma Cmin (pre-dose) concentrations at the end of treatment in Asian participants after administration of posaconazole IV 300 mg twice daily on day 1 and then posaconazole IV 300 mg once daily, and either continued on IV administration or switched to posaconazole oral suspension 200 mg 3 times daily (all evaluable participants in the intensive PK and sparse PK sampling subgroups). Cmin minimum concentration, IV intravenous, PK pharmacokinetics

References

    1. Lien MY, Chou CH, Lin CC, Bai LY, Chiu CF, Yeh SP, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for invasive fungal infections during induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0197851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197851.
    1. Keating GM. Posaconazole. Drugs. 2005;65(11):1553–1567. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565110-00007.
    1. Sun Y, Huang H, Chen J, Li J, Ma J, Li J, et al. Invasive fungal infection in patients receiving chemotherapy for hematological malignancy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study in China. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(2):757–767. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2649-7.
    1. Xu XH, Zhang L, Cao XX, Li J, Zhang W, Zhu TN, et al. Evaluation of the implementation rate of primary antifungal prophylaxis and the prognosis of invasive fungal disease in acute leukemia patients in China. J Infect Chemother. 2017;23(6):360–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.02.011.
    1. Tang L, Yang XF, Qiao M, Zhang L, Tang XW, Qiu HY, et al. Posaconazole vs voriconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies: a retrospective study. J Mycol Med. 2018;28(2):379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.11.003.
    1. Wang Y, Xing Y, Chen L, Meng T, Li Y, Xie J, et al. Fluconazole versus mould-active triazoles for primary antifungal prophylaxis in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Hematol. 2018;107(2):235–243. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2342-x.
    1. Li Y, Theuretzbacher U, Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of posaconazole. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(6):379–396. doi: 10.2165/11319340-000000000-00000.
    1. Courtney R, Wexler D, Radwanski E, Lim J, Laughlin M. Effect of food on the relative bioavailability of two oral formulations of posaconazole in healthy adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57(2):218–222. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01977.x.
    1. Krishna G, Moton A, Ma L, Medlock MM, McLeod J. The pharmacokinetics and absorption of posaconazole oral suspension under various gastric conditions in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(3):958–966. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01034-08.
    1. Pille S, Bohmer D. Options for artificial nutrition of cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol. 1998;174(Suppl 3):52–55.
    1. Vehreschild MJ, Meissner AM, Cornely OA, Maschmeyer G, Neumann S, Von Lilienfeld-Toal M, et al. Clinically defined chemotherapy-associated bowel syndrome predicts severe complications and death in cancer patients. Haematologica. 2011;96(12):1855–1860. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.049627.
    1. Sansone-Parsons A, Krishna G, Calzetta A, Wexler D, Kantesaria B, Rosenberg MA, et al. Effect of a nutritional supplement on posaconazole pharmacokinetics following oral administration to healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(5):1881–1883. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1881-1883.2006.
    1. Liu K, Wu D, Li J, Chen H, Ning H, Zhao T, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of posaconazole tablet formulation in chinese participants at high risk for invasive fungal infection. Adv Ther. 2020;37(5):2493–2506. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01341-x.
    1. Cornely OA, Duarte RF, Haider S, Chandrasekar P, Helfgott D, Jimenez JL, et al. Phase 3 pharmacokinetics and safety study of a posaconazole tablet formulation in patients at risk for invasive fungal disease. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(3):718–726. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv380.
    1. Cornely OA, Robertson MN, Haider S, Grigg A, Geddes M, Aoun M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety results from the phase 3 randomized, open-label, study of intravenous posaconazole in patients at risk of invasive fungal disease. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3406–3413. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx263.
    1. Maertens J, Cornely OA, Ullmann AJ, Heinz WJ, Krishna G, Patino H, et al. Phase 1B study of the pharmacokinetics and safety of posaconazole intravenous solution in patients at risk for invasive fungal disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(7):3610–3617. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02686-13.
    1. Walsh TJ, Raad I, Patterson TF, Chandrasekar P, Donowitz GR, Graybill R, et al. Treatment of invasive aspergillosis with posaconazole in patients who are refractory to or intolerant of conventional therapy: an externally controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(1):2–12. doi: 10.1086/508774.
    1. Sabatelli F, Patel R, Mann PA, Mendrick CA, Norris CC, Hare R, et al. In vitro activities of posaconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against a large collection of clinically important molds and yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(6):2009–2015. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00163-06.
    1. de Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1813–1821. doi: 10.1086/588660.
    1. Cornely OA, Helfgott D, Langston A, Heinz W, Vehreschild JJ, Vehreschild MJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of different dosing strategies of oral posaconazole in patients with compromised gastrointestinal function and who are at high risk for invasive fungal infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2652–2658. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05937-11.
    1. Li H, Wei Y, Zhang S, Xu L, Jiang J, Qiu Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of posaconazole administered by intravenous solution and oral tablet in healthy Chinese subjects and effect of food on tablet bioavailability. Clin Drug Investig. 2019;39(11):1109–1116. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00833-1.
    1. Kersemaekers WM, van Iersel T, Nassander U, O'Mara E, Waskin H, Caceres M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety study of posaconazole intravenous solution administered peripherally to healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(2):1246–1251. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04223-14.
    1. Ullmann AJ, Lipton JH, Vesole DH, Chandrasekar P, Langston A, Tarantolo SR, et al. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):335–347. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061098.
    1. Schauwvlieghe A, Buil JB, Verweij PE, Hoek RAS, Cornelissen JJ, Blijlevens NMA, et al. High-dose posaconazole for azole-resistant aspergillosis and other difficult-to-treat mould infections. Mycoses. 2020;63(2):122–130. doi: 10.1111/myc.13028.
    1. Shen Y, Huang XJ, Wang JX, Jin J, Hu JD, Yu K, et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole as invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in China: a multicenter, randomized, open-label study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;51(9):738–745. doi: 10.5414/CP201880.
    1. Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):348–359. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061094.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅