Management of acromioclavicular joint disease by manual therapy versus corticosteroid injections: the protocol of a non-inferiority study

Alexia Michaut, Lucie Planche, Lucie Auzanneau, Grégoire Cormier, Alexia Michaut, Lucie Planche, Lucie Auzanneau, Grégoire Cormier

Abstract

Introduction: Degenerative acromioclavicular joint pain accounts for about 4% of shoulder pain. Various medical and non-medical treatment strategies are available for acromioclavicular joint disease but it is difficult to conduct a comparative evaluation of these treatments. The few studies dealing with the medical management of the disease have conducted no comparative assessment of drug therapies, physiotherapy, joint manipulation and corticosteroid injections. The primary goal of this study is to determine whether manual therapy is not inferior to ultrasound-guided injection of a corticosteroid preparation to decrease acromiocalvicular joint pain at 3 months.

Methods and analysis: The acromioclavicular arthropathy managed by manual therapy is a monocentric, comparative, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority study conducted in the Rheumatology Department of Vendée Departmental Hospital, involving two parallel groups receiving either corticosteroid injections or manual therapy. The inclusion criteria are patients who suffer from pain in the shoulder or the proximal part of the arm, with pain located on palpation of the acromioclavicular joint associated with a positive cross-arm test and a positive O'Brien test. Randomisation will be at a 1:1 ratio. The injection group will receive a single ultrasound-guided injection of 1 mL of Diprostène and the manual therapy group will receive between one and three sessions at intervals of one per week. The primary outcome will be to compare the Visual Analogue Scale for pain-activity-related score at 3 months for both groups.

Ethics and dissemination: The study project has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee (Committee for the Protection of Patients Ouest II in Angers, 30 April 2019, with the registration number of 2019/22). In agreement with current French regulations, signed informed written consent will be obtained from each patient. Results of the main trial and of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number: NCT03951480.

Keywords: acromiocalvicular joint; corticosteroid injection; degenerative disease; manual therapy; pain.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ [Internet]..
    1. Juel NG, Natvig B. Shoulder diagnoses in secondary care, a one year cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:89. 10.1186/1471-2474-15-89
    1. Mall NA, Foley E, Chalmers PN, et al. . Degenerative joint disease of the acromioclavicular joint: a review. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:2684–92. 10.1177/0363546513485359
    1. Saccomanno MF, DE Ieso C, Milano G. Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation. Joints 2014;2:87–92. 10.11138/jts/2014.2.2.087
    1. Chaudhury S, Bavan L, Rupani N, et al. . Managing acromio-clavicular joint pain: a scoping review. Shoulder Elbow 2018;10:4–14. 10.1177/1758573217700839
    1. Sabeti-Aschraf M, Stotter C, Thaler C, et al. . Intra-articular versus periarticular acromioclavicular joint injection: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Arthroscopy 2013;29:1903–10. 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.027
    1. Sabeti-Aschraf M, Ochsner A, Schueller-Weidekamm C, et al. . The infiltration of the ac joint performed by one specialist: ultrasound versus palpation a prospective randomized pilot study. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:e37–40. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.06.018
    1. Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the visual analogue scale: myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain 2016;13:67–75. 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012
    1. Chelli M, Levy Y, Lavoué V, et al. . The "auto-constant": can we estimate the constant-murley score with a self-administered questionnaire? A pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:251–6. 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.023
    1. HAS EPAULE_SCORE_DASH.pdf. Available: [Accessed 26 Sept 2018].
    1. Tuton D, Barbe C, Salmon J-H, et al. . Transcultural validation of the Oxford shoulder score for the French-speaking population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016;102:555–8. 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.05.010
    1. Barwood SA, French JA, Watson LA, et al. . The specific AC score (sacs): a new and validated method of assessment of isolated acromioclavicular joint pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:2214–23. 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.026
    1. Park KD, Kim TK, Lee J, et al. . Palpation versus ultrasound-guided acromioclavicular joint intra-articular corticosteroid injections: a retrospective comparative clinical study. Pain Physician 2015;18:333–41.
    1. Rhon DI, Boyles RB, Cleland JA. One-year outcome of subacromial corticosteroid injection compared with manual physical therapy for the management of the unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome: a pragmatic randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:161–9. 10.7326/M13-2199
    1. Harris KD, Deyle GD, Gill NW, et al. . Manual physical therapy for injection-confirmed nonacute acromioclavicular joint pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42:66–80. 10.2519/jospt.2012.3866
    1. Winters JC, Sobel JS, Groenier KH, et al. . Comparison of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating shoulder complaints in general practice: randomised, single blind study. BMJ 1997;314:1320–5. 10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1320
    1. Peek AL, Miller C, Heneghan NR. Thoracic manual therapy in the management of non-specific shoulder pain: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther 2015;23:176–87. 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000003
    1. Shah JP, Thaker N, Heimur J, et al. . Myofascial trigger points then and now: a historical and scientific perspective. Pm R 2015;7:746–61. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.024
    1. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J 2006;15:S17–24. 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x
    1. HAS EPAULE_SCORE_DASH.pdf+. Available: [Accessed 8 Jan 2020].

Source: PubMed

3
订阅