Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab Improve Symptoms and Associated Outcomes in Ambulatory Patients at Increased Risk for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: Results From the Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Phase 3 BLAZE-1 Trial

Peter Chen, Gerhard Behre, Corey Hebert, Princy Kumar, Lisa Farmer Macpherson, Peita Louise Graham-Clarke, Inmaculada De La Torre, Russell M Nichols, Matthew M Hufford, Dipak R Patel, April N Naegeli, Peter Chen, Gerhard Behre, Corey Hebert, Princy Kumar, Lisa Farmer Macpherson, Peita Louise Graham-Clarke, Inmaculada De La Torre, Russell M Nichols, Matthew M Hufford, Dipak R Patel, April N Naegeli

Abstract

Background: In the phase 2/3 BLAZE-1 trial, bamlanivimab and etesevimab together reduced coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and any-cause mortality in ambulatory patients. Herein, we assess the impact of bamlanivimab and etesevimab treatment on the severity and length of symptoms and health outcomes among patients at increased risk for severe COVID-19.

Methods: In the phase 3 portion of BLAZE-1 (NCT04427501), symptomatic patients with increased risk for severe COVID-19 were randomized (2:1) to a single infusion of 700 mg bamlanivimab and 1400 mg etesevimab or placebo. Hospitalization events, vital signs, and symptomatology were monitored throughout the trial.

Results: Overall, 769 patients were randomized to bamlanivimab and etesevimab together (n = 511) or placebo (n = 258). The time to sustained symptom resolution was significantly shorter among patients who received bamlanivimab and etesevimab compared with placebo (8 vs 10 days; P < .01). The median time to first sustained symptom resolution of body aches and pain, chills, fatigue, feeling feverish, headache, and shortness of breath was significantly different in patients receiving bamlanivimab and etesevimab compared to placebo (P < .05). The proportion of patients who experienced COVID-19-related hospitalization by day 29 was significantly reduced among the bamlanivimab and etesevimab group compared with placebo (0.8% vs 5.4%; P < .01). The mean duration of hospital stay was numerically shorter among patients who received bamlanivimab and etesevimab (7.3 vs 13.5 days; P = .16), with fewer intensive care admissions.

Conclusions: Patients receiving bamlanivimab and etesevimab together resolved their symptoms more rapidly than those receiving placebo. Bamlanivimab and etesevimab treatment was associated with reduced rates of hospitalizations and shorter hospital stays.

Clinical trials registration: NCT04427501.

Keywords: COVID-19; bamlanivimab; etesevimab; symptomatology; treatment.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportion of participants demonstrating sustained symptom resolution (A), symptom resolution (B), and symptom improvement (C). Logistic regression analysis with duration of symptom onset category as factors. *P < .05. Efficacy population of first database lock: placebo, n = 258; bamlanivimab and etesevimab, n = 510.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Symptom score change from baseline (least squares mean [LSM]) at days 2–11. Error bars represent standard error. *P < .05, comparison vs placebo hazard ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Spider plot showing percentage of patients with sustained resolution at days 29 and 85. Numbers (60–100) represent percentage of patients at day 29 or day 85 with sustained resolution of each symptom. Patients with a baseline symptom score of 1 (mild) or more were included. Numbers for each symptom are shown in Table 2.

References

    1. Johns Hopkins University and Medicine. COVID-19 dashboard. . Accessed 2 March 2022.
    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Symptoms of COVID-19. 2021. . Accessed 2 March 2022.
    1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM.. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020; 323:1239–42.
    1. Gandhi RT, Lynch JB, del Rio C.. Mild or moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1757–66.
    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. . Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1708–20.
    1. Kim L, Garg S, O’Halloran A, et al. . Risk factors for intensive care unit admission and in-hospital mortality among hospitalized adults identified through the US coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–associated hospitalization surveillance network (COVID-NET). Clin Infect Dis 2020; 72:e206–14.
    1. National Institutes of Health. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment guidelines. . Accessed 2 September 2021.
    1. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, et al. . Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395:1763–70.
    1. Seeßle J, Waterboer T, Hippchen T, et al. . Persistent symptoms in adult patients one year after COVID-19: a prospective cohort study [manuscript published online ahead of print 5 July 2021]. Clin Infect Dis 2021. doi:10.1093/cid/ciab611.
    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, et al. . Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 384:403–16.
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. . Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603–15.
    1. Haas EJ, Angulo FJ, McLaughlin JM, et al. . Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data. Lancet 2021; 397:1819–29.
    1. National Institutes of Health. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment guidelines. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies. . Accessed 6 September 2021.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Fact sheet for health care providers: emergency use authorization (EUA) of bamlanivimab and etesevimab. . Accessed 2 March 2022.
    1. Gottlieb RL, Nirula A, Chen P, et al. . Effect of bamlanivimab as monotherapy or in combination with etesevimab on viral load in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021; 325: 632–44.
    1. Dougan M, Nirula A, Azizad M, et al. . Bamlanivimab plus etesevimab in mild or moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1382–92.
    1. Dougan M, Azizad M, Mocherla B, et al. . A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of bamlanivimab and etesevimab together in high-risk ambulatory patients with COVID-19 and validation of the prognostic value of persistently high viral load [manuscript published online ahead of print 28 October 2021]. Clin Infect Dis 2021. doi:10.1093/cid/ciab912.
    1. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, et al. . Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 38:101019.
    1. Anderson TS, O’Donoghue AL, Dechen T, Mechanic O, Stevens JP.. Uptake of outpatient monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19 in the United States: a cross-sectional analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:3922–4.
    1. Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, et al. . REGN-COV2, a neutralizing antibody cocktail, in outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:238–51.
    1. Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, et al. . REGEN-COV antibody combination and outcomes in outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:e81.
    1. Pannier J, Nass N, Behre G.. Monoclonal antibodies therapy for Covid-19—experiences at a regional hospital. medRxiv [Preprint]. Posted online 23 September 2021. doi: 10.1101/2021.09.22.21263488.
    1. Mahase E. Covid-19: What do we know about “long covid”? BMJ 2020; 370:m2815.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅