Alteration of Brain Functional Networks in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State fMRI Study

Linqiong Sang, Jiuquan Zhang, Li Wang, Jingna Zhang, Ye Zhang, Pengyue Li, Jian Wang, Mingguo Qiu, Linqiong Sang, Jiuquan Zhang, Li Wang, Jingna Zhang, Ye Zhang, Pengyue Li, Jian Wang, Mingguo Qiu

Abstract

Although alterations of topological organization have previously been reported in the brain functional network of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, the topological properties of the brain network in early-stage PD patients who received antiparkinson treatment are largely unknown. This study sought to determine the topological characteristics of the large-scale functional network in early-stage PD patients. First, 26early-stage PD patients (Hoehn and Yahr stage:1-2) and 30 age-matched normal controls were scanned using resting-state functional MRI. Subsequently, graph theoretical analysis was employed to investigate the abnormal topological configuration of the brain network in early-stage PD patients. We found that both the PD patient and control groups showed small-world properties in their functional brain networks. However, compared with the controls, the early-stage PD patients exhibited abnormal global properties, characterized by lower global efficiency. Moreover, the modular structure and the hub distribution were markedly altered in early-stage PD patients. Furthermore, PD patients exhibited increased nodal centrality, primarily in the bilateral pallidum, the inferior parietal lobule, and the medial superior frontal gyrus, and decreased nodal centrality in the caudate nucleus, the supplementary motor areas, the precentral gyrus, and the middle frontal gyrus. There were significant negative correlations between the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale motor scores and nodal centralities of superior parietal gyrus. These results suggest that the topological organization of the brain functional network was altered in early-stage PD patients who received antiparkinson treatment, and we speculated that the antiparkinson treatment may affect the efficiency of the brain network to effectively relieve clinical symptoms of PD.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Network efficiency of functional brain…
Fig 1. Network efficiency of functional brain networks as a function of sparsity among early-stage PD patients and normal controls.
(A) Mean global efficiency and (B) mean local efficiency of the functional brain networks. (C) Normalized global efficiency and (D) normalized local efficiency of the functional brain networks. The functional brain networks showed increased local network efficiency but approximately identical global network efficiency of parallel information transmission compared with the matched random network. Error bars denote standard deviations. Red stars indicate statistically significant differences between the PD patients and the normal controls (p

Fig 2. Network modularity of functional brain…

Fig 2. Network modularity of functional brain networks as a function of sparsity among PD…

Fig 2. Network modularity of functional brain networks as a function of sparsity among PD patients and normal controls.

Fig 3. Modules of the functional brain…

Fig 3. Modules of the functional brain networks in each group.

(A) Modules of the…

Fig 3. Modules of the functional brain networks in each group.
(A) Modules of the brain network in normal controls. (B) Modules of the brain network in PD patients. Colors in nodes and links correspond to different modules. Only intramodular edges are shown. The results were visualized using the BrainNet Viewer (NKLCNL, Beijing Normal University).

Fig 4. Hubs of the functional brain…

Fig 4. Hubs of the functional brain networks in each group.

The results were visualized…

Fig 4. Hubs of the functional brain networks in each group.
The results were visualized using the BrainNet Viewer (NKLCNL, Beijing Normal University). The maps showed the hubs of the brain network in normal controls (top panel) and in PD patients (bottom panel). Colors in nodes indicate different modules. Detailed brain region information corresponding to the anatomical labels can be found in S1 Table.

Fig 5. Brain regions showing significant alterations…

Fig 5. Brain regions showing significant alterations in nodal centrality between PD patients and normal…

Fig 5. Brain regions showing significant alterations in nodal centrality between PD patients and normal controls (p
The results were visualized using the BrainNet Viewer (NKLCNL, Beijing Normal University).Three-dimensional maps show the differences in nodal degree (top panel),nodal efficiency (middle panel),and nodal betweenness (bottom panel)between the PD group and the control group. Red/blue spheres denote regions of increased/decreased nodal centrality in PD patients. Detailed brain region information corresponding to the anatomical labels can be found in S1 Table.

Fig 6. Correlation between abnormal network properties…

Fig 6. Correlation between abnormal network properties and UPDRS motor scores.

SPG.L: the left superior…

Fig 6. Correlation between abnormal network properties and UPDRS motor scores.
SPG.L: the left superior parietal gyrus.
Fig 2. Network modularity of functional brain…
Fig 2. Network modularity of functional brain networks as a function of sparsity among PD patients and normal controls.
Fig 3. Modules of the functional brain…
Fig 3. Modules of the functional brain networks in each group.
(A) Modules of the brain network in normal controls. (B) Modules of the brain network in PD patients. Colors in nodes and links correspond to different modules. Only intramodular edges are shown. The results were visualized using the BrainNet Viewer (NKLCNL, Beijing Normal University).
Fig 4. Hubs of the functional brain…
Fig 4. Hubs of the functional brain networks in each group.
The results were visualized using the BrainNet Viewer (NKLCNL, Beijing Normal University). The maps showed the hubs of the brain network in normal controls (top panel) and in PD patients (bottom panel). Colors in nodes indicate different modules. Detailed brain region information corresponding to the anatomical labels can be found in S1 Table.
Fig 5. Brain regions showing significant alterations…
Fig 5. Brain regions showing significant alterations in nodal centrality between PD patients and normal controls (p
The results were visualized using the BrainNet Viewer (NKLCNL, Beijing Normal University).Three-dimensional maps show the differences in nodal degree (top panel),nodal efficiency (middle panel),and nodal betweenness (bottom panel)between the PD group and the control group. Red/blue spheres denote regions of increased/decreased nodal centrality in PD patients. Detailed brain region information corresponding to the anatomical labels can be found in S1 Table.
Fig 6. Correlation between abnormal network properties…
Fig 6. Correlation between abnormal network properties and UPDRS motor scores.
SPG.L: the left superior parietal gyrus.

References

    1. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E (2003) Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease. NEUROBIOL AGING,24:197–211.
    1. Schwarz J, Odin P, Buhmann C, Hu P, Wang K (2011) Depression in Parkinson’s disease. J NEUROL., 258:336e–338e.
    1. Ferrer I (2011) Neuropathology and neurochemistry of nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis.,:1e–13e.
    1. Gallagher DA, Schrag A (2012) Psychosis, apathy, depression and anxiety in Parkinson’s disease. NEUROBIOL DIS.,46:581e–589e.
    1. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, Kragh-Sorensen P (2001) Risk of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. A community-based prospective study. Neurology,56:730–6.
    1. Nilsson FM, Kessing LV, Bolwig TG (2001) Increased risk of developing Parkinson's disease for patients with major affective disorder: a register study. Acta Psychiatr. Scand.,104:380–6.
    1. Ponsen MM, Stoffers D, Booij J, van Eck-Smit BLF, Wolters EC, Berendse HW (2004) Idiopathic hyposmia as a preclinical sign of Parkinson’s disease. Ann.Neurol., 56:173e–181e.
    1. Dickson DW, Fujishiro H, Orr C, DelleDonne A, Josephs KA, Frigerio R, et al. (2009) Neuropathology of non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.,15 (suppl 3):S1–5. 10.1016/S1353-8020(09)70769-2
    1. Brooks DJ, Pavese N (2011) Imaging biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease. PROG NEUROBIOL.,95:614–28. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.08.009
    1. Zhang D, Raichle M (2010) Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol., 6:15–28. 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.198
    1. Fox M, Raichle M (2007) Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci.,8:700–711.
    1. Fabio B, Giuseppe N, Cristina T, Emilia M (2000) Functional changes of the basal ganglia circuitry in Parkinson’s disease. PROG NEUROBIOL.,62:63–88.
    1. Baudrexel S, Witte T, Seifried C, Wegner Von F, Beissner F, Klein JC, et al. (2011) Resting state fMRI reveals increased subthalamic nucleus-motor cortex connectivity in Parkinson’s disease. NEUROIMAGE,55:1728–38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.017
    1. Hacker CD, Perlmutter JS, Criswell SR, Ances BM, Snyder AZ (2012) Resting state functional connectivity of the striatum in Parkinson’s disease. Brain,135:3699–711. 10.1093/brain/aws281
    1. Bassett DS, Bullmore E (2008) Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia. J NEUROSCI.,28:9239–48. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-08.2008
    1. Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Sucking J, Bullmore E (2006) A resilient, low frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J NEUROSCI.,26:63–72.
    1. Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. NatureReviews,10:186–98.
    1. Lo CY, Wang PN, Chou KH, Wang J, He Y, Lin CP (2010) Diffusion tensor tractography reveals abnormal topological organization in structural cortical networks in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci.,30:16876–85. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4136-10.2010
    1. Stam C, De Haan W, Daffertshofer A, Jones B, Manshanden I, van Cappellen VWA (2009) Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. BRAIN,132:213–24. 10.1093/brain/awn262
    1. Van den Heuvel MP, Mandl R, Stam C, Kahn R (2010) Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: A graph theoretical analysis. J Neurosci., 30:15915–26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2874-10.2010
    1. Liu Y, Liang M, Zhou Y, He Y, Hao Y, Song M (2008) Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. BRAIN,131:945–61. 10.1093/brain/awn018
    1. Zhang J, Wang J, Wu Q, Kuang W, Huang X, He Y, et al. (2011) Disrupted Brain Connectivity Networks in Drug-Naive, First-Episode Major Depressive Disorder. BIOL PSYCHIATRY.,70:334–42. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.018
    1. Wu T, Wang L, Chen Y, Zhao C, Liu Y, He G (2009) Changes of functional connectivity of the motor network in the resting state in Parkinson's disease. NEUROSCI LETT,460:6–10. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.046
    1. Skidmore FM, Korenkevych D, Liu Y, He G (2011) Connectivity brain networks based on wavelet correlation analysis in Parkinson fMRI data. NEUROSCI LETT,499:47–51. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.030
    1. Baggio H, Sala-Llonch R, Segura B, Marti M, Valldeoriola F, Compta Y, et al. (2014) Functional Brain Networks and Cognitive Deficitsin Parkinson's Disease. HUM BRAIN MAPP.,35:4620–34. 10.1002/hbm.22499
    1. Luo CY, Guo XY, Song W, Chen Q, Cao B, Yang J, et al. (2015) Functional connectome assessed using graph theory in drug-naive Parkinson’s disease. J NEUROL.,262:1557–67. 10.1007/s00415-015-7750-3
    1. Delaveau P, Salgado-Pineda P, Fossati P, Witjas T, Azulay JP, Blin O (2010) Dopaminergic modulation of the default mode network in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.,20:784–92. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.07.001
    1. Palmer SJ, Eigenraam L, Hoque T, McCaig RG, Troiano A, McKeown MJ (2009) Levodopa-sensitive, dynamic changes in effective connectivity during simultaneous movements in Parkinson's disease. NEUROSCIENCE,158:693–704. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.053
    1. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,55:181–4.
    1. Hoehn MM, Yahr M (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. NEUROLOGY,17:427–42.
    1. Shen H, Wang L, Liu Y, Hu D (2010) Discriminative analysis of resting-state functional connectivity patterns of schizophrenia using low dimensional embedding of fMRI. NEUROIMAGE,49:3110 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.011
    1. Zeng LL, Shen H, Liu L, Wang L, Li B, Fang P, et al. (2012) Identifying major depression using whole-brain functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis. BRAIN,135:1498–507. 10.1093/brain/aws059
    1. Achard S, Bullmore E (2007) Efficiency and Sparsity of economical brain functional networks. PLOS COMPUT BIOL.,3:e17
    1. Wang J, Z X., He Y (2010) Graph-based network analysis of resting-state functional MRI. Front. Syst. Neurosci.,4:16 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00016
    1. Glerean E, Salmi J, Lahnakoski JM, Jääskeläinen IP, Sams M (2012) Functional magnetic resonance imaging phase synchronization as a measure of dynamic functional connectivity. Brain connectivity,2:91–101. 10.1089/brain.2011.0068
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcrox N, et al. (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NEUROIMAGE,15:273–89.
    1. Salvador R, Suckling J, Schwarzbauer C, Bullmore E (2005) Undirected graphs of frequency-dependent functional connectivity in whole brain networks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.,360:937–46.
    1. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature,393:440–2.
    1. Latora V, Marchiori M (2001) Efficient behavior of small-world networks. PHYS REV LETT,87:198701
    1. Maslov S, Sneppen K (2002) Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. SCIENCE,296:910–3.
    1. Sporns O, Zwi JD (2004) The smallworld of the cerebral cortex,2:145–62.
    1. Newman ME (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc.Natl Acad. Sci. USA.,103:8577–82.
    1. Freeman LC (1977) Set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry., 40:35–41.
    1. Tian L, Wang J, Yan C, He Y (2011) Hemisphere-and gender-related differences in small-world brain networks: a resting-state functional MRI study. NEUROIMAGE,54:191–202. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.066
    1. He Y, Wang J, Wang L, Chen ZJ, Yan C, Yang H, et al. (2009) Uncovering intrinsic modular organization of spontaneous brain activity in humans,4:e5226.
    1. He Y, Dagher A, Chen Z, Charil A, Zijdenbos A, Worsley K, et al. (2009) Impaired small-world efficiency in structural cortical networks in multiple sclerosis associated with white matter lesion load. Brain,132:3366–79. 10.1093/brain/awp089
    1. Bullmore E, Achard S (2007) Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks. Comput. Biol., 3:e17.
    1. Dubbelink KTEO, Hillebrand A, Stoffers D, Dejien JB (2013) Disrupted brain network topology in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal magnetoencephalography study. BRAIN, 137:197–207. 10.1093/brain/awt316
    1. Cameron IGM, Pari G, Alahyane N, Brien DC, Coe BC, Stroman PW, et al. (2012) Impaired executive function signals in motor brain regions in Parkinson's disease. NEUROIMAGE,60:1156–70. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.057
    1. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Xu J, Wu X, Zhang Y, Feng H (2014) Cortical gyrifica-tion reductions and subcortical atrophy in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord.,29:122–6. 10.1002/mds.25680
    1. Langeneeker S, Brieeno E, Hamid N (2007) An evaluation of distinct volumetric and functional MRI contributions toward understanding age and task performance: A study in the basal ganglia. BRAIN RES.,1135:58–68.
    1. Obeso JA, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Rodriguez M, Lanciego JL, Artieda J, Gonzalo N, et al. (2000) OlanowPathophysiology of the basal ganglia inParkinson's disease. Trends Neurosci. (Suppl.),23:8–19.
    1. Galvan A, Wichmann T (2008) Pathophysiology of Parkinsonism. CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL.,119:1459–74. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.017
    1. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD, Delong MR (1990) Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions. Progr. BRAIN RES.,85:119–46.
    1. Aron AR, Wise SP, Poldrack RA (2009) Cognition: basal ganglia role In: Squire L.R., Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford: Academic Press; 2009.
    1. Nachev P, Kennard C, Husain M (2008) Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. NAT REV NEUROSCI.,9:856–69. 10.1038/nrn2478
    1. Desmurget M, Sirigu A (2012) Conscious motor intention emerges in the inferior parietal lobule. Neurobiology,22:1004–11.
    1. Stocco A, Lebiere C, Anderson JR (2010) Conditional Routing of Information to the Cortex: A Model of the Basal Ganglia's Role in Cognitive Coordination. PSYCHOL REV.,117:541–74. 10.1037/a0019077
    1. Lehericy S, Gerardin E (2002) Normal functional imaging of the basal ganglia. Epileptic Disord. (suppl. 3), 4:S23–30.
    1. Carbon M, Ma Y, Barnes A, Dhawan V, Chaly T, Ghilardi MF, et al. (2004) Caudate nucleus: influence of dopaminergic input on sequence learning and brain activation in parkinsonism. NEUROIMAGE,21:1497–507.
    1. Polito C, Berti V, Ramat S, Vanzi E, De Cristofaro MT, Pellicano G, et al. (2012) Interaction of caudate dopamine depletion and brainmetabolic changeswith cognitive dysfunction in early Parkinson's disease. NEUROBIOL AGING,33:e229–39.
    1. Van Beilen M, Portman AT, Kiers HA, Maguire RP, Kaasinen V, Koning M, et al. (2008) Striatal FDOPA uptake and cognition in advanced non-demented Parkinson's disease: a clinical and FDOPA-PET study. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.,14:224–8. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2007.08.011

Source: PubMed

3
订阅